Will people ever stop molesting E30s en masse?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • digger
    replied
    the N52 doesn't make enough power OOTB to warrant the complexity of the swap IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • hkv
    replied
    Originally posted by Motheye99

    x2

    Swapping in anything that weighs significantly more than a M20 is a bad move. The S54 has the cool factor but it weights to damn much. Leave it for the E36/E46 they can handle it. Now we just need a good N52 swap right up..
    n52 swap or even n20 swap would be awesome. im with the lotus performance philosophy of lightweight over power

    Leave a comment:


  • Motheye99
    replied
    Originally posted by varg
    Any mod which improves the car is fair game imo. Improving is partially subjective but the objective outlook is that stuff like stance and mono wipers or hacking fenders and quarters up to screw pandem body kits on do nothing to improve the car in any way and are ricer-tier, I would love to see that type of thing stop just to reduce the attrition. Undoing a swap you don't like is trivial compared to restoring a car that has had holes scraped in its underbody or the wheel arches hacked out.

    Engine swaps are a blessed modification, they frequently improve the car a great deal and are always at least interesting. As long as you don't do something silly, putting a boat anchor like a 2JZ or an all iron V8 in an E30 I'm game. I don't see the point of an M50 swap (a lot of work for barely any improvement in power) or an M6X swap (why go through all of the trouble to put a V8 in your car only to choose a performance dead end like the M6X family?) but if it floats your boat it didn't exactly ruin the car. Drop a 600lb engine in the front of a car that came with a 400lb one though, kinda ruins the point of owning a light car that handles well. If you wanted to build a drag car you should have bought a G body or something. But an LS (real LS not an iron block truck motor which is an LQ/LM/LR) for example is no heavier than an S54 and sits further back and BMW guys lap S54 swaps up so what's the big deal? Even I4 swaps; Honda (F series, K series) and Toyota (3S-GE) made some NA I4s which compare favorably to any BMW I4 in every respect from the factory so swap away. Nissan made a couple of decent turbo I4s which make good swaps.

    If you play your cards right you might wind up with a car that is a fine handling machine and quite fast while remaining comfortable, like mine
    x2

    Swapping in anything that weighs significantly more than a M20 is a bad move. The S54 has the cool factor but it weights to damn much. Leave it for the E36/E46 they can handle it. Now we just need a good N52 swap right up..

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    People who hate on the m42 must have been born in the late 80's or early 90's, and not been driving when these cars were new. Sure, by today's standards, it's weak, but modern cars weigh over 2 tons and need 400hp just to get any kind of acceleration.

    Cars were painfully under powered at that time, the m42 was actually a powerful engine for it's size in the day when compared with like-kinding. In 1989/90 you had the likes of turbo 2.2 Dodges with 170hp, IROC-Z had 220, SHO with 220, Fiero with 140, Prelude 140, Legend 200 (after 1990), 944 200, even the all mighty Corvette only had 240, Mustang GT 225, and the list goes on. So, in 1990 when you bought a brand new 318is, you really weren't being left far behind - especially if it's not straight line racing.

    A friend of mine has a 318 endurance car, and even though the m42 has less power, the lap times were not that far off our car when it was all bone stock. He managed to get the car down to just over 2klb where we are about 600lb more.

    Now, the fun cars back then were the likes of the TTA and T-Types and GN's. My pops' friend bought a new GN, was hacking the ECM right away and that thing was an animal. That was in Mass so he had to reverse everything he did for the yearly inspections. The TTA's were even faster as GM had to re-design the heads to fit in the f-body strut towers, and had an unintended benefit of promoting flow (ever try and source a set of TTA heads?, I did before just slapping turbo(s) on the 3.1/3.4).

    Leave a comment:


  • Melon
    replied
    Let it be known Roguetoaster knows how to meme.

    Leave a comment:


  • majdomo
    replied
    People gonna people... hah that’s my line! I think, it’s your money and your car, do what you want to it but don’t be a bitch if no one else likes your velour interior or stanced out wheels and don’t complain if you can’t get your money back out of the car later. That shouldn’t matter, as long as you like it who gives a rat’s ass. This goes for any car, btw...Porsche, VW, BMW, muscle car, whatever. Also, I’m OEM+ all day, jfyi. Not that it matters. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	sIUXse9.jpg
Views:	221
Size:	109.0 KB
ID:	9889802

    Leave a comment:


  • lukeADE335i
    replied
    Originally posted by varg
    Engine swaps are a blessed modification, they frequently improve the car a great deal and are always at least interesting.

    If you play your cards right you might wind up with a car that is a fine handling machine and quite fast while remaining comfortable, like mine
    Have to agree - I enjoy my e30 far more with the M30 in it that I did the M20 - sounds like a bigger, less softly spoken M20 & the torque under the curve makes for a great road car. Sure - at 10/10ths on the track it's going to understeer slightly more than an M20 or M42, but on the street the extra weight is barely noticeable - even while enjoying some "spirited driving" as the Germans would say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melon
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	almightyLS1.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	73.3 KB
ID:	9889673

    Leave a comment:


  • varg
    replied
    Any mod which improves the car is fair game imo. Improving is partially subjective but the objective outlook is that stuff like stance and mono wipers or hacking fenders and quarters up to screw pandem body kits on do nothing to improve the car in any way and are ricer-tier, I would love to see that type of thing stop just to reduce the attrition. Undoing a swap you don't like is trivial compared to restoring a car that has had holes scraped in its underbody or the wheel arches hacked out.

    Engine swaps are a blessed modification, they frequently improve the car a great deal and are always at least interesting. As long as you don't do something silly, putting a boat anchor like a 2JZ or an all iron V8 in an E30 I'm game. I don't see the point of an M50 swap (a lot of work for barely any improvement in power) or an M6X swap (why go through all of the trouble to put a V8 in your car only to choose a performance dead end like the M6X family?) but if it floats your boat it didn't exactly ruin the car. Drop a 600lb engine in the front of a car that came with a 400lb one though, kinda ruins the point of owning a light car that handles well. If you wanted to build a drag car you should have bought a G body or something. But an LS (real LS not an iron block truck motor which is an LQ/LM/LR) for example is no heavier than an S54 and sits further back and BMW guys lap S54 swaps up so what's the big deal? Even I4 swaps; Honda (F series, K series) and Toyota (3S-GE) made some NA I4s which compare favorably to any BMW I4 in every respect from the factory so swap away. Nissan made a couple of decent turbo I4s which make good swaps.

    If you play your cards right you might wind up with a car that is a fine handling machine and quite fast while remaining comfortable, like mine

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by e30davie
    So its OK to "molest" an e30 if you consult a random website and get the blessing of a bunch of anonymous posters. Ok cool, ill keep that in mind.
    You have to argue with them first, and then just do whatever you were going to do in the beginning, it's the rule.

    Leave a comment:


  • e30davie
    replied
    So its OK to "molest" an e30 if you consult a random website and get the blessing of a bunch of anonymous posters. Ok cool, ill keep that in mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZeKahr
    replied
    Originally posted by roguetoaster

    Says the person who wants to remove stuff from an E30 that would definitely make it worse for no real improvement and who wants to spray paint over rust with our blessing.
    At least I consulted you guys before even attempting to do all of that. I'm sure most people who molest E30s just do whatever they do before coming on here asking if it's a good idea. I thought over it and decided to leave all of the stuff on the car. As for the chassis paint, it looked like it could blend in with the gloss black paint on my car and from what I read it helps eliminate rust. Now I'm thinking that I'll probably just grind the surface rust away, apply POR15 over that, and then and apply the factory paint over that; but I'll to reassess that situation once my car is mechanically sorted.

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by ZeKahr

    On the spectrum ... that's off the top of my head.
    Says the person who wants to remove stuff from an E30 that would definitely make it worse for no real improvement and who wants to spray paint over rust with our blessing.

    Leave a comment:


  • e30davie
    replied
    Would you also like all of the e30 owners to get off your lawn?

    Leave a comment:

Working...