Yea, that is the only reason i would ever run bags.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Satin: Update
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 1989e30325 View PostWhat's ghetto about it? Looks fairly clean to me?
-Painted I lip
-White paint/stains on rockers
-Tint
-Scratched trim
-Wheel offsets
-Exhaust
-CV boots
-Chipping paint on your wheels
-Red calipers
-Windsheild wiper
-Rear valence
But if that is your idea of how a E30 should be then good for you.
Comment
-
it is slammedddd... too much for funciton... but its the style that matters here.Turbo e30 M52. Built Motor, GT3582r
Watch my vids http://www.youtube.com/user/GrudgeRider156?feature=mhum
Comment
-
Originally posted by nwvb bmw View PostReally?
-Painted I lip
-White paint/stains on rockers
-Tint
-Scratched trim
-Wheel offsets
-Exhaust
-CV boots
-Chipping paint on your wheels
-Red calipers
-Windsheild wiper
-Rear valence
But if that is your idea of how a E30 should be then good for you.
But im sure your car is perfect, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by nwvb bmw View Post-Painted I lip
-Tint
-Red calipers
But if that is your idea of how a E30 should be then good for you.
But if that isn't your idea of how a E30 should be good, then too fucking bad for you. It's not your car. You and your list of "acceptable and not acceptable" items for an E30 can get bent. And the same goes for the rest of the self-proclaimed "what's ok on an E30" police in this thread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1989e30325 View PostWhich one of those cars? None of them are really that low... i only see one of them barely tucking tire. Also having a big front lip does not make the car lower, and all 3 of those have big lips plus a little extra. Im not sure what you mean?
Those cars are Sport Evo M3s in racing trim. In that configuration or previous equivalent onesthey had a win percentage which, I believe, still remains unmatched. BMW ran them as works cars from 1987 to 1991 and that is a very significant portion of why an M3 is considered an M3 and a BMW is considered the way it is today.
The point is, if there were any need to go any lower, those cars would be lower. They are not.
So your car is lowered for looks, to the obvious detriment of function. And as such, posted on a public forum, it's subject to be judged on looks alone. On that basis, I concur with the previous poster: it looks ridiculous on top of being undeniably ruined functionally. If you like it, more power to you, but by posting on a forum you did invite opinions. This is mine.
Comment
Comment