Originally posted by rwh11385
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
My runs on alcohol, like me...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by nineohfour View Postwhy not finance a used 2000-2004 330i 4 door it doesnt run on corn but it does get descent gas millage. and like it or not that chevy WILL fall apart after 10 to 12 years. its a fact.
and i'm not keeping it for that long.
i'm waiting for Swedish companies to bring their sweet and luxurious flex fuel cars here that use turbos so E85 actually has more power along with same or better mpg
but this is a start
Comment
-
Originally posted by rwh11385 View Postbecause i want to burn corn not fossil fuel
and i'm not keeping it for that long.
i'm waiting for Swedish companies to bring their sweet and luxurious flex fuel cars here that use turbos so E85 actually has more power along with same or better mpg
but this is a start"We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."
Comment
-
Originally posted by atomic View PostBiggest problem with e85 is depending on where you live dictates the availability of the fuel. Obviously in the midwest it is abundant but everywhere else it isn't.
http://e85vehicles.com/e85-stations.htm
fill up when you're around it, or gas when you need it.
or just pour in some everclear with gas... haha
agricultural companies will continue to expand production, improve refinement, find better crops to use, expand farming and not just substitute, and there will be more availability, but the demand must grow now with people like me in order for improvement to come.
Comment
-
So, let's say 50% of the time you fill up with gas the the other 50% you use ethanol. That's still using as much if not more gas than a good hybrid. Plus, it's an Impala. It will lose it's value much faster than a hybrid and the cool factor is non existent."We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."
Comment
-
I agree it isn't a problem if it is a flexfuel car. But in my state, since there is less than 10 stations statewide that sells e85, that it is not worth the upcharge that a flexfuel vehicle costs. I would love to buy something other than fossil fuels but its just not worth having a e85 car here IMHO.
I am thinking however on making my own bio-diesel for my truck, if diesel prices get much higher...
Comment
-
This, Heeter, is why I don't fuckin care. Why waste the extra coin? That type of setup isn't worth it for the next 6-8 years IMHO. I'm already paying more for your gas options right now, typical system move.
Originally posted by http://e85vehicles.com/e85-california.htm
California E85 Gas Stations
California has 4 public service station that offered E85 Fuel as of Oct 07. California does have 3 Private E85 fueling locations , one at Vandenberg Air Force Base and the other at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory . It is surprising given California's stringent emissions laws that ethanol and E85 isn't in wider use but with such strong emissions Laws we expect California to come on board with strong Ethanol support within a few years if not sooner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Turf1600 View PostSo, let's say 50% of the time you fill up with gas the the other 50% you use ethanol. That's still using as much if not more gas than a good hybrid. Plus, it's an Impala. It will lose it's value much faster than a hybrid and the cool factor is non existent.
And if you want cars solely for cool factor and not making a change for the environment, that's your choice but don't hate on mine because I want to make a difference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostThis, Heeter, is why I don't fuckin care. Why waste the extra coin?
with more demand, with come more supply and E85 will be more practical to try to use nationwide.
it is much better for emissions, and if properly tuned with use of turbos, not a loss of mpg and a gain in power.
and hybrid? besides the argument of battery waste - why not a E100 convertible with hybrid technology as well. zero fossil fuel and lots of mpg. it exists, just needs the infrastructure... which is btw going to be much easier to set up than hydrogen
Comment
-
Originally posted by atomic View PostI agree it isn't a problem if it is a flexfuel car. But in my state, since there is less than 10 stations statewide that sells e85, that it is not worth the upcharge that a flexfuel vehicle costs. I would love to buy something other than fossil fuels but its just not worth having a e85 car here IMHO.
I am thinking however on making my own bio-diesel for my truck, if diesel prices get much higher...
It will eventually change, if people show their is a demand and desire for it, and we make better use of it like in Sweden... CCXR for example.
Change won't come overnight but steps should be taken to make it eventually come about.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rwh11385 View Postextra coin? most FFV seem to cost nearly the same, since costs of adaption are offset by incentives for car manufacturers. simply having the option helps a little, with maybe only the occasional fill up on corn.
with more demand, with come more supply and E85 will be more practical to try to use nationwide.
it is much better for emissions, and if properly tuned with use of turbos, not a loss of mpg and a gain in power.
and hybrid? besides the argument of battery waste - why not a E100 convertible with hybrid technology as well. zero fossil fuel and lots of mpg. it exists, just needs the infrastructure... which is btw going to be much easier to set up than hydrogen
When does the value of e85/e100 offset the savings on a national level from fossil fuels to balance rising food/production costs? When it is used as "Heating Oil Alternative"?
Comment
Comment