I don't doubt that there are other sources of oil coming into the oceans.  However, this spewing well is causing a monstrous oil slick on top of the water and below the surface that is going to be washing ashore all along the gulf coast.  This will be killing lots of animals and putting lots of fishermen out of work.  Whatever previous sources are not having that effect.
 
Might be a "drop in the bucket" but its a rather huge drop. I'm sure that BP would like to stop it. The point is they failed to prepare and, thus far, have failed in stopping it.
 
Being responsible and being financially responsible are two very different things. I don't doubt that BP will lose a ton of money cleaning things up but much of the damage is irreversible. Paying fishermen, capping the well, and skimming the oil off the surface is being financially responsible for the disaster. Being prepared to keep something like this from ever happening is being responsible.
 
So, because someone cares about an oil spill means that they previously did not care about oil in the oceans? When the spill is visible for miles on the surface and below and is washing up along miles of beautiful coastline, I'm going to say its significant. I might even say that when its not visible and not choking the wildlife, it is less significant.
 
I understand and agree that this spill is not the only source of oil in our oceans, but it is a serious catastrophe that will have lasting effects in many areas for a long time. If there is going to be offshore drilling, better procedures need to be in place to keep large-scale spills from happening. I'm sure BP is doing their best, but its not good enough.
 
I love the Gulf and don't want thousands of barrels of oil washing up where I like to hang out. Its too bad that you see it as a joke. I'd rather spend $20 a gallon and have a beach than $1 a gallon and live in toxic shit.
 
Call me a "useful idiot," but if you can't see a problem here, you're a fucking idiot.
					Might be a "drop in the bucket" but its a rather huge drop. I'm sure that BP would like to stop it. The point is they failed to prepare and, thus far, have failed in stopping it.
Being responsible and being financially responsible are two very different things. I don't doubt that BP will lose a ton of money cleaning things up but much of the damage is irreversible. Paying fishermen, capping the well, and skimming the oil off the surface is being financially responsible for the disaster. Being prepared to keep something like this from ever happening is being responsible.
So, because someone cares about an oil spill means that they previously did not care about oil in the oceans? When the spill is visible for miles on the surface and below and is washing up along miles of beautiful coastline, I'm going to say its significant. I might even say that when its not visible and not choking the wildlife, it is less significant.
I understand and agree that this spill is not the only source of oil in our oceans, but it is a serious catastrophe that will have lasting effects in many areas for a long time. If there is going to be offshore drilling, better procedures need to be in place to keep large-scale spills from happening. I'm sure BP is doing their best, but its not good enough.
I love the Gulf and don't want thousands of barrels of oil washing up where I like to hang out. Its too bad that you see it as a joke. I'd rather spend $20 a gallon and have a beach than $1 a gallon and live in toxic shit.
Call me a "useful idiot," but if you can't see a problem here, you're a fucking idiot.






Comment