ex-LAPD - Chris Dorner

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cha Ching
    replied
    Originally posted by 2761377
    re the misinformation posted by the LEO apologist in post 168- no, it was san bernardino sheriff dept that prosecuted the burn. and the deputy killed was SBD also. big bear is out of RivCo jurisdiction as much as it it out of LAPD's.

    it was a disappointing end given his boasting in the manifesto. media claimed he had a barrett .50- what happened to it? that could have been used to good effect. probably another LAPD scare tactic to inflame the public against him.
    You're right, I stand corrected.
    Last edited by Cha Ching; 02-16-2013, 02:10 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajackz
    replied
    All I'm saying if the media caught word of our soldiers or Marines burning down a building to kill a bunch of terrorist there would be a full investigation. Young American faces would be plastered all over the tv and polititions would be calling for action.


    Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • 2761377
    replied
    re the misinformation posted by the LEO apologist in post 168- no, it was san bernardino sheriff dept that prosecuted the burn. and the deputy killed was SBD also. big bear is out of RivCo jurisdiction as much as it it out of LAPD's.

    it was a disappointing end given his boasting in the manifesto. media claimed he had a barrett .50- what happened to it? that could have been used to good effect. probably another LAPD scare tactic to inflame the public against him.

    Leave a comment:


  • craiggroves91
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    fucking insane. This shits been going on for two weeks lol
    You're joking right?

    They identified his body through dental records. He is DEAD.

    Unless I missed something

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    Originally posted by slammin.e28guy
    Nope.
    fucking insane. This shits been going on for two weeks lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Stanley Rockafella
    replied
    All i gotta say....


    Leave a comment:


  • slammin.e28
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    so is the dude dead or no?
    Nope.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    so is the dude dead or no?

    Leave a comment:


  • slammin.e28
    replied
    Originally posted by CabbE30
    Anyone else hear that the tipsters wont be receiving any reward because LAPD killed him instead. Apparently the reward was for information leading to the capture of Dorner and since he is supposedly dead now there will be no reward for the couple whom called about Dorner's whereabouts.
    LAPD.....assholes.

    Leave a comment:


  • e30_3I8I
    replied
    hHHAH what did you expect ?

    Leave a comment:


  • CabbE30
    replied
    Anyone else hear that the tipsters wont be receiving any reward because LAPD killed him instead. Apparently the reward was for information leading to the capture of Dorner and since he is supposedly dead now there will be no reward for the couple whom called about Dorner's whereabouts.

    Leave a comment:


  • deutschman
    replied
    I hope the people whos hows it was get a sweet new house. It would suck to see your place on fire on the news.

    Leave a comment:


  • DÌEGØ
    replied
    Originally posted by Cha Ching
    There is no such thing as, "incendiary tear gas". You're probably repeating what uninformed or misinformed media are representing to the public. Also, what do you mean, by, "If they wanted to smoke him out..."? They aren't trying to smoke anyone out. The purpose of tear gas is to get the suspect to walk out under his own accord. Where are you getting this information about pushing walls down to, "...let in fresh air"??

    You also appear to be mixing agencies. LAPD had nothing to do with the shootout at the cabin, it's outside their jurisdiction. Several agencies were involved including LA County Sheriff's and Fish and Game Wardens.
    Pyrotecnic tear gas is known to be flamable
    +
    "Cops were heard saying: 'We're gonna go forward with the plan, with, er, with the burn. We want it, er, like we talked about. ... Seven burners [tear gas canisters] deployed and we have a fire.....We're going to burn him out ... Burn this motherfucker!'"

    I guess I meant they wanted to "gas him out" with tear gas. But yet they're tearing down walls?? Wouldn't they want the tear gas to stay concentrated inside to be effective?

    both parties where wrong IMO

    I heard today they had confirmed it was his body. via dental records

    Leave a comment:


  • Cha Ching
    replied
    Originally posted by xAZxE30x
    A "cooked off" round will not hurt Anyone. It'll just pop the bullet off. For it to kill or severely injure someone it needs a barrel to build the proper pressure For sake of argument I'll just say that I wouldn't want to be pressing my luck around exposed rounds and an open flame. But from a tactical perspective and in the 'rush' of a situation like this, it's hard to tell if someone is firing a gun at you or what. Better safe then sorry if you want to go home at the end of your shift.

    They were never planning on putting it out

    I don't agree with his killings but its fucked up they burned him. Like someone said, this is not the Middle Ages Middle Age methods-of-death notwithstanding, Dorner's actions led to his own demise (take a deep breath and say it again, it's okay). The only reason he burned was his inability or refusal to come out of the cabin. The sad reality is that Dorner knew ahead of time how this was all going to end for him. I really do believe he needed some professional help, I am sad about that.

    My tin foil hat is also on ;) OK where can I get one of these damn hats?! I think I also need one!

    Leave a comment:


  • ButtJuice
    replied
    Originally posted by Wschnitz
    Psychotic killers dont right manifestos with with pretty decent grammar and punctuation. Plus these "murders" have not been proven except for the cops that got shot trying to apprehend him. Mind you all but one of the deaths were police force related.

    Also, from the manifesto he wasn't boo hooing as you say, from what it says they were being fairly cruel and racist not only to fellow officers but also to convicts/apprehended people. Just because you get a badge doesn't mean you get to beat on people when you like.

    Still, Criminal, psycho, or not, burning someone to death is redic, and if they heard a shot and assumed he was dead why fire tear gas into it. Honestly they should have quarantined the area of suspect, evacuated all the innocents, then waited it out with snipers or military units. Trying to "take him down" as they would say, only risks more lives and is a waste of resources.

    LAPD didn't make any good tactical decisions from the news footage In my opinion.

    I understand the "killer" aspect and wanting to protect the people. But this still seems fishy.

    "tin foil hat on"
    I noticed a lot of grammatical errors in his "manifesto", it annoyed me. But compared to the average r3v tard, his grammar was impeccable. :p

    Leave a comment:

Working...