Cars that look good Slammed/Stanced

[Jpac75]

I was originally planning on slamming my 325is but I decided against it after reading some posts. Now I'm planning on making the 325 and autocross/ track car. I want to know what cars you think look good slammed. I want something that is not too common and still looks good. I'm okay with trucks or cars but I prefer rwd. Please help

[ELVA164]

The list looks pretty complete.

[markseven]

Subjective, but here goes:

Anything looks good lowered, whether it's a FWD Caddy or a moped.

Go as low as you want as as long as:

• Handling is improved
• Suspension, steering, and drivetrain geometries are not negatively impacted.
• No more than -1.5° rear camber
• Rims + tires are tucked or flush
• No poke, no stretch

Function > Form

[JasonC]

Classic Merc, always looks good slammed.

[rturbo 930]

Hmm... If I were going to slam a car, I'd probably choose an older luxury car, like an old Benz, or an old (50s/60s) pickup. And I'd use bags. Because fuck having to drive an inch off the ground 24/7.

Slamming a sports car or sports sedan is stupid IMO. Completely ruins the function of the car.

[YosemiteSam]

Most 50's Caddys, 1965 Lincoln Continental. Never been a fan of the "Stance" scene, I love a good low-rider.

[samurai pizza cats]

wrong forum. http://www.stanceworks.com/forums/ there you go.

[lambo]

I like low big body cars. As for e30's I prefer a compromise between lows and big tires.

Like Sebo's

[lambo]

Also, my favorite s chassis

[Bglad]

No more than 1.5* of camber?? LOL. My STC Civic has 3*. Function over form.

[Northern]

Almost all cars looks better lowered/slammed within reason.

Way fewer truly look "good" that way.

(I appreciate everything in this thread so far, I'm talking about the kids who stance their grandmother's '90s or '00's <insert bottom-of-the-barrel-appliance-car here>, spray half the car with plastidip, post it up on stanceworks and assume everyone will worship them as a stance icon... but that's a story for another time)

[Northern]

I was originally planning on slamming my 325is but I decided against it after reading some posts. Now I'm planning on making the 325 and autocross/ track car.

Not sure why it can't be both. Assuming you're running different tires/wheels on the street.

[markseven]

No more than 1.5* of camber?? LOL. My STC Civic has 3*. Function over form.

Rear? I'm talking E30 here.

[markseven]

Also, I don't know anything about Hondas, but it seems like a light, FWD car like a Civic wouldn't need that much camber at the back (SE30 rear are at -2.5° or so?), but again, I don't know much about those chassis'.

[e30onBBSs]

s2000 <3