If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Also, I don't know anything about Hondas, but it seems like a light, FWD car like a Civic wouldn't need that much camber at the back (SE30 rear are at -2.5° or so?), but again, I don't know much about those chassis'.
I was originally planning on slamming my 325is but I decided against it after reading some posts. Now I'm planning on making the 325 and autocross/ track car.
Not sure why it can't be both. Assuming you're running different tires/wheels on the street.
Almost all cars looks better lowered/slammed within reason.
Way fewer truly look "good" that way.
(I appreciate everything in this thread so far, I'm talking about the kids who stance their grandmother's '90s or '00's <insert bottom-of-the-barrel-appliance-car here>, spray half the car with plastidip, post it up on stanceworks and assume everyone will worship them as a stance icon... but that's a story for another time)
Hmm... If I were going to slam a car, I'd probably choose an older luxury car, like an old Benz, or an old (50s/60s) pickup. And I'd use bags. Because fuck having to drive an inch off the ground 24/7.
Slamming a sports car or sports sedan is stupid IMO. Completely ruins the function of the car.
Leave a comment: