A hard video to watch!

[marakka]

That second video is filled with a lot of good information that needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

Like the fact that the buildings collapsed with the weight of a 100 ton plane inside of them. The video overlooks that fact and claims that secondary explosions caused the collapse. Wouldn't the breaking of a main support beam in a 1300ft tall structure sound like a explosion? Iunno... just my theories.

But thanks for the link. Very informative.

[Charlie]

take a few minutes and ponder this video and the concept

I had a nice response all typed out, but I think that good King Maddox sums it up better than even I can pull off.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

-Charlie

[Vedubin01]

There is no need to think about that. Its just like where the black panthers said they had proof that the gov. blew up the levees in NO. They said that they had proff of powder residue on parts of the levee.


Its the left wing that so hates the fact that Bush is in office that they would say anything to stir up shit. They are able to swing the sheep into believing what they have to say. And YES SHEEP! The heat from the fuel turned the metal brittle and lost strength. The sheer weight of the mass that was displaced is what caused the building to fall. Nothing more.

People need to stop tree hugging and remember what happend. The only thing man can do right is to destroy. Need to stop sniffing pollen and maybe pick up the bible!

[Dave]

Look,

As much as I firmly believe that Bush is corrupt and Cheney is both corrupt and to a certain degree evil, no way the government foisted 9/11 upon us.

When they lie to us, they do it to our faces.

Will they recklessly go to war on flimsy evidence, finding "proof" where there isnt any, yes?

Will they allow our energy policy be manipulated to serve the(ir) interests in oil? Yes.

Is it any wonder Bush was close with Ken Lay, the Enron CEO? No.

Will they manipulate the electoral process? Yes.

Will they give ridiculous no-bid contracts and turn their eye to out and out theft by Halliburton and others in iRaq? Yes.

But, as bad as those things are (especially the war), no way they were behind 9/11.

[marakka]

One thing I've been pondering all day though..... Whats with the Pentagon? I always thought the same thing.... there was no wreckage. Hell.... I never even saw the hole they pointed out in the video. THAT was strange to say the least.

[Vedubin01]

the Pentagon is top secret viewed from the inside. That is why you did not see much coverage of it. The plane did not hit directly but slid into the Pentagon. My old company was contracted to move some office equipment to there and we had to have the drivers go though some crazy security and they were not even able to drive their own trucks within a mile of the site.

[moatilliatta]

Damn.....that sent a chill up my spine.

Jon

me to

[marakka]

Not saying that I agree with the film, but I did think the same things about the Pentagon as what was questioned in the film. No impact site in front of the building and no debris. I understand the inside is Top Secret and can't be filmed, but once again..... a plane that hits in front of a building will have been damaged enough to begin falling apart in front of the same building. When it strikes the building it should blow into a billion pieces. I don't know what did what, but its just an odd thing that has me goin..... Hmmm...

[delphini]

(moment Of Silence)

[Vedubin01]

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...lr%3D%26sa%3DG

Also to go with that theory about no wreckage. What about United flight 93 I think it was, it was nothing but a big hole in the ground. Infact you would not have known that a plane crashed by looking at debris.

[h0lmes]

There is no need to think about that. Its just like where the black panthers said they had proof that the gov. blew up the levees in NO. They said that they had proff of powder residue on parts of the levee.


Its the left wing that so hates the fact that Bush is in office that they would say anything to stir up shit. They are able to swing the sheep into believing what they have to say. And YES SHEEP! The heat from the fuel turned the metal brittle and lost strength. The sheer weight of the mass that was displaced is what caused the building to fall. Nothing more.

People need to stop tree hugging and remember what happend. The only thing man can do right is to destroy. Need to stop sniffing pollen and maybe pick up the bible!

Lol you call left wingers sheep yet you are a Christian. Ironic.

[Vedubin01]

Lol you call left wingers sheep yet you are a Christian. Ironic.

The guy whos voice you hear on the video just found out about the afterlife. You know if you follow the bible and there is no god, then there is nothing lost and you lived a life trying to help others and strived for a better life. IF you do not believe in the bible and god, and you die, there is a God, then its to late to repent. I see it as an answer to questions that no one can answer. And it works for me!

Thank you for asking!

[madjurgen]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...12457137943386

take a few minutes and ponder this video and the concept

If youre going to take an hour to watch this video, then take another hour to read http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html disputing nearly every 'fact' or theory proposed by 'loose change'.

[DEV0 E30]

Wow... that video is hard to watch. Operator and firefighter try to give the guy hope, but they can't say much. We won't forget, but remember Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11. Dave broke it down, I can't believe some of the agenda the current administration has, but to think our own government would not hurt so many American lives directly? That is much too hard to believe, makes me sick thinking that.

I assume many also know about the movie coming out, with a large cast. That much like Flight 93 there are mixed views about, but still they happened.

[MattE30]

Not saying that I agree with the film, but I did think the same things about the Pentagon as what was questioned in the film. No impact site in front of the building and no debris. I understand the inside is Top Secret and can't be filmed, but once again..... a plane that hits in front of a building will have been damaged enough to begin falling apart in front of the same building. When it strikes the building it should blow into a billion pieces. I don't know what did what, but its just an odd thing that has me goin..... Hmmm...

Are you a scientist that is an expert on demolitions? Are you a civil engineer that studied the blue prints of the pentagon? Are you a pilot that is an expert on evasive aircraft maneuvers? My point is there is conspiracy shit all over the internet (I have seen the video you are talking about), and those people don't know the science about anything they are talking about.