Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Engineer Gets 110 MPG Out Of '87 Mustang

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Engineer Gets 110 MPG Out Of '87 Mustang

    Do you think this guy is full of crap?

    Build your own dreams, or someone else will hire you to build theirs!

    Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

    #2
    Full of crap. 350% gain in efficiency. Yeah. Sure.
    Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

    massivebrakes.com

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





    Comment


      #3
      400 horsepower, 0-60 in 3 seconds, 110mpg...





      Riiiiiiight

      Comment


        #4
        sounds legit..

        I was up above it, Now I'm down in it ~ Entropy - A Build thread.
        @Zakspeed_US

        Comment


          #5
          curious to see what he did to it.
          "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

          Comment


            #6
            ^+1
            sigpic89 M3

            Comment


              #7
              I wonder if he tuned it so that complete combustion reactions are taking place.
              "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

              Comment


                #8
                maybe if he was going down hill with the engine off yeah

                www.gutenparts.com
                One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

                Comment


                  #9
                  that was my initial thought.. and then maybe optimized it so the spark happened to produce maximum pressure/torque at the piston... but a 38% gain seems a bit high.
                  assuming a typical engine runs at 250 degrees (372 K) inside the combustion chamber (based on the fact that my M3's oil temp is just shy of 210 during normal operation) and exhausts to an average outsie air temp of 50 degrees (283 K), the maximum Carnot efficiency of (hot-cold)/(hot) = 24%.

                  again for those that don't understand.. (372K-283K)/(372K)=0.24, or 24%.

                  That's the maximum thermodynamic efficiency of any mechanical engine before real-world effects are added in (friction, non-isentropic air, non-stoichiometric burning, etc).

                  I tried doing some calculations, but it's impossible to do without knowing the rolling resistance, frontal area, etc. that would make up the force the engine would have to overcome.
                  Last edited by Ral; 07-03-2008, 03:04 PM.
                  sigpic89 M3

                  Comment


                    #10
                    i hope its true, but ill belive it when i see it.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Full of crap, its pretty obvious.

                      He only mentions "electronics" as his method of improving efficiency.

                      Plus all of his numbers are round. 400hp, 500ft-lbs, 110mpg and 3 seconds 0-60. Those are the things you say when you are listing what you want, not what exists.

                      Everyone wants 500hp but BMW MADE a 507hp car.
                      Im now E30less.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Distributed by Internet Broadcasting. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
                        does it seem legit to you?

                        join the E30 Cabrio owners gruppe
                        click here for details


                        Comment


                          #13
                          if it is true, how long do you think until he comes up "missing" :p

                          Comment


                            #14
                            No way, the color of the sky is different where that guy lives.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              better mpg than a go-ped?
                              tasty

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X