The moderator of Thursday's vice-presidential debate

[Raginl3ull]

They can label themselves Gods if they like.... Stop being a tool! Or does that hurt your feelings too?

No I'm not sensitive and feminine like you....sorry to disappoint you AGAIN!

[kronus]

I don't see anything in there that says anything about being unbiased. You're still either missing the point, or have acknowledged and and are trying to steer attention away from it by being emo about something else.

[Vedubin01]

No I'm not sensitive and feminine like you....sorry to disappoint you AGAIN!

Id split you from your navel to your asshole!

[Aptyp]

Id split you from your navel to your asshole!

That's Blunts job

[Raginl3ull]

Id split you from your navel to your asshole!

Again, I'm not gay...but it sounds like your well hung. Sorry bro, don't advertise that shit to me...thats just fucking nasty

[Aptyp]

I don't see anything in there that says anything about being unbiased. You're still either missing the point, or have acknowledged and and are trying to steer attention away from it by being emo about something else.

Careful, he may cut himself and blame his parents next.

[kronus]

Id split you from your navel to your asshole!

Would you be going in from the navel or the asshole? You make it sound like the former, in which case that is gruesome.

[Raginl3ull]

Would you be going in from the navel or the asshole? You make it sound like the former, in which case that is gruesome.

Exactly....damn i wonder if he tosses salad too, because of all the shit coming out of his mouth LOL

[devonjordan]

I cant wait for the election to be over...

[Vedubin01]

I cant wait for the election to be over...

Thats only the beginning.... then the whining begins. :)

[Jon325i]

Funny - I thought this thread was about the moderator of last nights' debate? Seems things have gravitated just a bit off topic.


Jon

[eric (^__^)]

all threads lead to the anus

[FredK]

Oh yes they do have to be unbiased when flexing their power and threatening to ban someone.

As much as I'd like this to be true, it doesn't HAVE to be true. These are E30 geeks, not Supreme Court judges. :razz:

This is a political, not to mention controversial topic...which means he really has to be sensitive in terms of how and when to ban someone.

Yeah, I think some latitude in these political threads is required. IMO having a contradictory viewpoint to another member should not be grounds for banning. You don't need to have an early join date or a post count to be able to express your opinions. Better to have an opinion than to be a clueless moron who busts into general forums and immediately asks "24V swap. What do I need."

[kronus]

Yeah, I think some latitude in these political threads is required. IMO having a contradictory viewpoint to another member should not be grounds for banning. You don't need to have an early join date or a post count to be able to express your opinions. Better to have an opinion than to be a clueless moron who busts into general forums and immediately asks "24V swap. What do I need."

There we go, Raging|3ull managed to convince the world that an injustice against him has been done. Let me reiterate: he got told off because he was being unnecessarily annoying, whiny, and contrarian, not because of his political views. He is now trying to twist his being told off into a big dramatic thing where the moderators are part of a massive right-wing conspiracy that is trying to keep his opinion down and relieve him of his rights on an old car forum.

What's annoying is that I don't disagree with his point, once you distill the whine out of it and disregard everything he said after that.

[eric (^__^)]

But that's just, like, your opinion, man.