GUN GUYS! So it begins

[tofubento]

My father brought up a good point on this...

" They wont try and directly ban guns, I could see it more as a means to re-direct the attention away from something else"

Honestly, I see it and could see that happening more then anything else.

I honestly dont think they will ever put a ban inplace again...specially since the decision...but if they do...man thats not going to go well for whom ever votes yes for it...as in will be voted out as mentioned earlier.

[iamsam]

Well i'm just going to join the Jedi Academy and become a Jedi, so i won't need a gun.

[Holland]

Bullshit! take away our guns, then all the bitches will smuggle them in. They break in our houses, take our shit, and rape our dogs while we watch them. Notice the states who don't outlaw guns for the most part don't have huge gun related crime problems? take away all our guns, makes sense to me.

[Vedubin01]

Bullshit! take away our guns, then all the bitches will smuggle them in. They break in our houses, take our shit, and rape our dogs while we watch them. Notice the states who don't outlaw guns for the most part don't have huge gun related crime problems? take away all our guns, makes sense to me.

Perfect example, Chicago.... District of Columbia.....Los Angeles

[der affe]

I'm going to take a wild guess and assume none of you who have registered such indignant protest about this proposed legislation have bothered to compose an intelligent, thoughtful and succinct letter to your congressional representative urging them to not support it.....?

actually i did, as soon as i started reading this thread. i called everyone of them today. will begin writing tomorrow

[der affe]

Bullshit! take away our guns, then all the bitches will smuggle them in. They break in our houses, take our shit, and rape our dogs while we watch them. Notice the states who don't outlaw guns for the most part don't have huge gun related crime problems? take away all our guns, makes sense to me.

is that gun shop still open by you that was selling all of the nato S&B ammo cheap?

[Chisum]

I don't need the assault weapons, but seems to me a .22 can be just as deadly as an AK in the right hands. Banning the M1? That's just fukin stupid.
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the US Supreme Court just rule on the second Amendment as it applied to the handgun ban in Washington, C.D. ? And did not the court say the ban was unconstitutional? And did not the Washington C.D council just vote the ban in again? And my question is, why aren't those council members who voted for a new ban found in contempt of court and jailed?
I guess if you are a Democrat, the law doesn't apply to you. It's what you want to do for the children that matters. Well, that and the global community. And the environment. And gay marriage. And welfare. And drive-though abortions. And condoms in kindergarten. And deficits. And the International Baccalearate Programme. And E-recycling. And homes for minorities that have no money to pay the mortgage. And affirmative action. And nationalized health care. And "undocumented" people running across the border from Mexico. And new gas taxes. And Fidel Castro day. And throw a shoe at Bush day.
Thank you.

[416stroker]

thats so similar to cali laws... The bullet button will become everyone friend if there weapons not on the list. it makes no sense to bring back the federal ban they proved it didnt afet crime rates at all due to the fact that mostly all are commited with Pistols.

Edit: I wouldnt worry about this to much all it sounds lke to me is they will adopt the ca laws and there is to many loop holes. They can ban all ak or ar ect it has to be bye specific make and model. If its not on the list youl just have to have a feature less build. meanign it has to follow this rule

" A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud." read the ca asault weapon laws these are so simular.

[tofubento]

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the US Supreme Court just rule on the second Amendment as it applied to the handgun ban in Washington, C.D. ? And did not the court say the ban was unconstitutional? And did not the Washington C.D council just vote the ban in again? And my question is, why aren't those council members who voted for a new ban found in contempt of court and jailed?

+1 Democrates ( not all but most ) feel that their " causes " are for the greater good. But in reality its for those that have the louded voice.

Republicans need to start standing up and voicing their thoughts!

[416stroker]

alos found this on calguns.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by diginit

[Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Bradys plan to introduce shortly. ]

This is scaremongering We're already on the 111th Congress.

Basically this is a dupe of at least three threads today alone claiming the boogey man is coming to get us. Just you wait! But send money to the address above...

[madjurgen]

Why doesnt this get brought up more often?



"One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in...

A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced. Gun control advocates respond "Just wait... we'll be safer... you'll see...".

OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of- the-elderly
At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said "self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm"
From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns". Their response has been to "wait longer". "

[joshh]

Holy shit the M1 carbine...That has to be a joke. It's basically a hand gun round...LMFAO.

[tofubento]

Why doesnt this get brought up more often?



"One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in...

A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced. Gun control advocates respond "Just wait... we'll be safer... you'll see...".

OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of- the-elderly
At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said "self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm"
From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns". Their response has been to "wait longer". "

I was wondering when someone was going to psot this...I didnt have any of the exact figures, but DAMN!

Even with HARD FACTS most libtards dont want to see the truth. They would still like to live in their "version" of the real world.

[joshh]

Why doesnt this get brought up more often?



"One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in...

A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced. Gun control advocates respond "Just wait... we'll be safer... you'll see...".

OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of- the-elderly
At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said "self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm"
From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns". Their response has been to "wait longer". "

Yes, I looked forever for those stats. Thank you.

[ragged325]

Gentlemen, it is time. The founding fathers of our proud country fought to make AMERICA what it is, if we don't stand up today and take action we are just cowards who don't deserve to live in this once great nation. I'm calling on the R3V Militia to go into action.

Our constitution was drafted to allow us to gather arms to overthrow the government if necessary and the time is now.

Our first mission will be to gather our guns and head to our Waco-style compound. Does anyone have access to their parent's basement near the Washington D.C. area? We will need to organize all of the like-minded patriots for our resistance.

Our second goal will be take over the Nation's capitol, but I don't want to give too much away on a public forum.

R3V Militia sign-up sheet:

1. Vedubin01
2. Monkeyshit
3. e30_Cabrio
4. Ral
5. JoshH
6. Heeter
7. tofusomething
8. mrs. leeve
9. atomic
10. ________________________

*please add more lines as you add your name, I got kind of lazy (sorry). Don't worry, future messages will be more secure and better organized. Maybe I should have started my own thread for this call to arms, but it's too late for that now. We're going to start a fund for gas, chips and ammo, but don't think we're turning into socialists okay.

edit: P.S.: This letter-writing shit is for waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswafflesy-pansies. Do you think George Washington would have written a letter to ask for his freedom?