Atheist acting up again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by kronus
    Read that back to yourself and attempt to convince yourself that it makes sense.


    Makes perfect sense. Did you fail high school or something?


    Originally posted by kronus
    They're a health risk... to each other. And, big surprise, not being able to marry each other doesn't stop gay sex.

    (also, I know you're angrily typing "BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS" as you read this, but marriage laws have no effect on that)


    It sure doesn't but it does stop them from (as easily) putting the children they raise or want to raise from being around that health risk. Let alone gays are the highest risk factor for AIDS.

    But then that goes right back to my animals and marriage question that you guys keep running from. It hurts "no one else" right? And the dads and moms question.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    Special immoral rights
    There we go. Just accept it, let it all out. Stop using current laws as a crutch for your own beliefs, and stand behind them yourself, like a man with a shred of moral fiber.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    I've already answered this but since you want to spin the whole point. It's not that I wouldn't get the right, it's that they already have the right to marry. Just marry the opposite sex, morally.
    Read that back to yourself and attempt to convince yourself that it makes sense.

    Originally posted by joshh
    Plus gays are more of a health risk than anyone else in terms of AIDS.
    They're a health risk... to each other. And, big surprise, not being able to marry each other doesn't stop gay sex.

    (also, I know you're angrily typing "BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS" as you read this, but marriage laws have no effect on that)

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by kronus
    Doesn't answer the question.

    If gays get the right to marry each other, what special right do they gain that you wouldn't have?

    I've already answered this but since you want to spin the whole point. It's not that I wouldn't get the right, it's that they already have the right to marry. Just marry the opposite sex, morally.
    Plus gays are more of a health risk than anyone else in terms of AIDS.



    Originally posted by E-Thirty
    ^^ Haha, I never claimed that either. You've got some deep hatred for these people. Get raped in the showers back in high school?


    I know you're saying a whole lot of nothing.

    No I don't spin mister. I just think they already have the same rights as us and shouldn't be given special immoral rights.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Also, as an answer, I will accept "I'm bigoted, but too much of a waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffles to admit it, so I will instead hide behind idiotic interpretations of existing laws, while at the same time whining and bitching about there being laws".

    Leave a comment:


  • E-Thirty
    replied
    ^^ Haha, I never claimed that either. You've got some deep hatred for these people. Get raped in the showers back in high school?

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    Already answered. They already have the right to marry.
    Doesn't answer the question.

    If gays get the right to marry each other, what special right do they gain that you wouldn't have?

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by E-Thirty
    Way to put words in my mouth. So it's a fucked up upbringing that makes a child end up gay now?

    Oh gee sorry does that conflict with your idea that people are born fucked up?



    Originally posted by kronus
    Answer the question

    Already answered. They already have the right to marry.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    They already have the right to marry...the opposite sex.
    Answer the question

    Leave a comment:


  • E-Thirty
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    It would never happen. But as if that would keep me from loving them anyways. Now get your head out of your ass and stop thinking that because someone thinks differently than you that they are brutal and treat their offspring differently because they fucked up somewhere along the way and their child ended up gay.
    Way to put words in my mouth. So it's a fucked up upbringing that makes a child end up gay now?

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by E-Thirty
    ^I wonder whats going to happen if you have a child that turns out to be gay.


    It would never happen. But as if that would keep me from loving them anyways. Now get your head out of your ass and stop thinking that because someone thinks differently than you that they are brutal and treat their offspring differently because they fucked up somewhere along the way and their child ended up gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • E-Thirty
    replied
    ^I wonder whats going to happen if you have a child that turns out to be gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by briansjacobs
    how is this not similiar to seperate but equal. It is in a way the same damn thing.
    Because they already have the right to marry.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by briansjacobs
    at this point the only person in the world asking to marry their mom or dad or pet or sister or brother is you. If you would like to talk further about it, get a million or so people to sign a petition, then we will talk about. Until then it is a mute point.


    Semantics. The slippery slope never stops for you guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by kronus
    Wait, wait, I'm not understanding. If gays get the right to marry each other, what special right do they have that you don't?


    They already have the right to marry...the opposite sex.

    Leave a comment:

Working...