Atheist acting up again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by briansjacobs
    ok now that is out of the way, extend marital rights to civil unions and legalize civil unions in all 50?


    Sure as long as they are ONLY civic unions and no Insurance or marriage laws apply to them. And you allow moms and daughters, sons and dads to be part of those civil unions....and animals.
    You're trying to squeeze in the idea they don't already have the same rights as the rest of us straight people.

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    Thanks for admitting they have the same rights as the rest of us.
    Logic smacks you up side the head.
    ok now that is out of the way, extend marital rights to civil unions and legalize civil unions in all 50?

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by briansjacobs
    again symantics. saying they can marry a person of the opposite sex is not an answer to the same sex marriage issue.

    idiot smacks you in the head


    Thanks for admitting they have the same rights as the rest of us.
    Logic smacks you up side the head.

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    How is allowing them the same rights as the rest of us bigoted?
    again symantics. saying they can marry a person of the opposite sex is not an answer to the same sex marriage issue.

    idiot smacks you in the head

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied

    LMAO, I have a slight case of dislexia and when reading your original post as %64 of men with aids had sex with animals. that is why I asked for supporting documentation. Sorry no reason to doubt the original post. I even went throug the link looking for mention of beastiality.

    Leave a comment:


  • markseven
    replied
    Originally posted by briansjacobs
    please supply the data to back this up
    I think this is what you want:



    Of 214,379 HIV/AIDS diagnoses in 33 states during 2001--2006, a total of 97,577 (46%) were among MSM. Decreases in diagnoses were observed in all transmission categories except MSM (excluding MSM and IDU) (Figure 1). Among males, MSM accounted for 97,577 (63%) of cases. Men aged 25--44 years accounted for 64% of cases among MSM (Table). Among MSM, the number of diagnoses increased from 16,081 (CI = 15,784--16,377) in 2001 to 17,465 (CI = 16,938--17,992) in 2006; (EAPC = 1.5) (Figure 1).

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by JeepJockey

    All the money spent on AIDS in the country and half of it could be eliminated tomorrow if men would just stop banging male ass.

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/...NAL508COMP.pdf
    or start wearing condoms

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by Vedubin01
    If you cant look around and see that some higher power created everything around you then yeah small minded. Man as yet been able to prove the conception of mankind.
    man has yet to prove the existence of god. call it a draw for now and back to the point of the conversation at hand

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by JeepJockey
    CDC disagrees: As of June 2001, 64% of men with AIDS were men who have had sex with men.

    please supply the data to back this up

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    It's only a slippery slope if they fall for your blatant trolling and use of logical fallacies.


    Yet you still can't answer the question...

    Leave a comment:


  • ak-
    replied
    Originally posted by Massive Lee
    Why? You are a black Muslim homosexual abortionist?
    sorta.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    It's only a slippery slope if they fall for your blatant trolling and use of logical fallacies.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by Kershaw
    PEOPLE are animals. if other animals do it freely and with the same percentages as our species.... uh.. durr.. durr.. MAN, I JUST CANT MAKE A CONNECTION THERE.

    I LOST MY ABILITY TO THINK ABSTRACTLY.

    and furthermore on the concept of thinking abstractly, how are you doing on separating legal marriage from religious marriage?

    i have one question to ask you, if you get married in a church, are you legally married? or do you then have to go to a courthouse?

    i mean.. I DONT KNOW...


    Oh this is fucking great. So then based on what you said people should be able to marry animals after all we are animals right. Hey you fell right into that one. Should have read the thread further. Thanks for the support on that one.

    Your question is a pointless one because marriage is a legal one currently.
    So if gays can marry why can't a person that loves animals marry and animal. Or a son and Dad marry. or a Mom and daughter?

    The slippery slope is a steep one for you liberal non thinkers.

    Leave a comment:


  • dvs909
    replied
    Originally posted by Kershaw
    you're an idiot.

    The strange case of the homosexual necrophiliac duck pushed out the boundaries of knowledge in a rather improbable way when it was recorded by Dutch researcher Kees Moeliker.


    check that out. not only is homosexuality common in MOST SPECIES, that duck is a gay necrophiliac.
    thanks for bringing that up. necropilia doesn't hurt anyone. shouldnt that be ok by your standards? (i agree its not, just admit that your applying morals to this issue. once you admit that lets discuss whose morals are correct)

    Leave a comment:

Working...