Peanut Butter = Evolution is a lie

[kronus]

ok so where did the chicken come from??

Bird-like dinosaurs

[sonnyqm3]

ok where did the Bird like Dinosaurs come from???

[Holland]

Fish-like dinosaurs.

[BraveUlysses]

Fish-like dinosaurs.

who were herded by:

[sonnyqm3]

well maybe you guys can do a lil more research.. I am a believer and I believe that we/all were created by a creator. Some call him God, Allah, Dios and many other names..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rm9h6V...

[sonnyqm3]

science says its theory not fact, for example Darwin. It was his theory, its what he believed or thought..

[briansjacobs]

for all you non believers.. What came first the Chicken or the Egg???

enter your mom joke here

[briansjacobs]

well maybe you guys can do a lil more research.. I am a believer and I believe that we/all were created by a creator. Some call him God, Allah, Dios and many other names..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rm9h6V...

if you are going to apply the logic of "where did that come from" you have to apply the logic to the creator as well. Where did the creator come from? If you will not accept the answer for one side of the argument you can not accept it from the other side.

[sonnyqm3]

enter your mom joke here

lets not talk about moms, we are just having a discussion.

[LBJefferies]

ok so where did the chicken come from??

From a hen and a rooster.

Each and every chicken is born different from every other. This is because of genetics. A hen will pass certain traits (maybe short legs, big eyes, etc.) onto the chick and the rooster will pass certain traits (maybe a long beak, colored feathers, etc.) onto the chick. Some of these traits are beneficial for survival while others may hinder survival. For example, a long beak may be beneficial for eating and gathering food while short legs may prevent the chicken from running from predators. This is genetics and it applies to every life form on the planet.

The idea behind evolution is that the fittest creatures, i.e. the ones born with many beneficial traits, survive and pass these traits on to their offspring. The ones with the negative traits do not survive to have offspring and therefore these traits are not passed on. Eventually all the negative traits are weeded out of the gene pool and after a couple hundred thousand or millions of years you get creatures that are far removed from their ancestors. Give it hundreds of millions or billions of years and you get entirely new species, phylums, kingdoms, and so on. It really is an elegant way of explaining the plethora of life we have on this planet.

So, the chicken came from an ever so slightly different chicken and that chicken came from an ever so slightly different chicken and so on until you have an ancestor that was very different from the one you started with.

[LBJefferies]

science says its theory not fact

EXACTLY!

And that is why science is superior to religion.

[briansjacobs]

science says its theory not fact, for example Darwin. It was his theory, its what he believed or thought..

the theory of evolution is just that. It is a theory, at the current time the "big bang" and "evolution" are the two best theories of how we got here and how we came to be.

The difference between believers in creation and believers in the big bang/evolution is this, creationist will always believe in creation, Evolutionist are constantly looking and waiting for someone to "prove" a new theory and teach us more.

We discredit creation not for our hatred of religion, but for the lack of any kind of proof.

[sonnyqm3]

well I guess w just have to wait and see.

[mar1t1me]

well maybe you guys can do a lil more research.. I am a believer and I believe that we/all were created by a creator. Some call him God, Allah, Dios and many other names..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rm9h6V...

So who created him?

Man created his gods in his own image.

Oh, and I finally did get around to watching the "conclusive proof" in that video. I am nearly speechless, except to say.....if no "new" life is ever found, how do these people explain the thousands of "new" species found every year? Many even occur in areas scientists would say are pretty well cataloged.

But I would be more willing to believe that life on this planet was seeded by extraterrestrials rather than abandon all sense* and drink the invisible man in the sky kool-aid. Some call it communion, but it's still creepy. "Here-eat my body and drink my blood and I'll take you to heaven with me...."

*if there were no stars and all probes launched ran into something hard about 10 miles up, you could argue that the possibility of ET is remote at best. But with hundreds of millions of stars and planets which we can see, but no real evidence the invisible man in the sky even exists, much less gives a shit, I'd say the logical advantage goes to ET. ;-)

[sonnyqm3]

God is the creator and we/everything is his creation..