Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

$5 Gas in 2012?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post
    It's really not even worth discussing it with you..


    Of course not. The economy isn't doing well and fuel prices are abnormally high. But it definitely has *nothing* to do with who the most powerful man in the world is.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post
    It's really not even worth discussing it with you..
    nothing is, i'm surprised you even bother.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    It's really not even worth discussing it with you..

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post
    uhm. yes? isn't that obvious?

    the economy overheated. oil prices spiked. the economy tanked. oil prices plummeted. the economy started to gain steam. oil prices rose again. the economy's growth is slowing - oil prices are flat.

    it pretty much has zero to do with whoever is president. Unless you're Carter and you enact price restrictions. :p


    Regardless if they are unusually high in a bad economy? This economy has never gained steam over the past 2 years. It's been at a crawl and has been for over two years.

    It does matter who is President. Oil companies are absolutely going to take advantage of a President who wants energy prices to "necessarily skyrocket" so he can implement more green energy. Just not directly. 16 months of gas over 3.11 and still going. Even the evil Bush didn't do that. He had a spike which lasted 8 months.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kershaw
    replied
    are you claiming that oil prices dont trend?

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    uhm. yes? isn't that obvious?

    the economy overheated. oil prices spiked. the economy tanked. oil prices plummeted. the economy started to gain steam. oil prices rose again. the economy's growth is slowing - oil prices are flat.

    it pretty much has zero to do with whoever is president. Unless you're Carter and you enact price restrictions. :p

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post
    you mean when the world economy hit a total standstill, we were losing 500,000+ jobs a month and oil droped by more than half in 6 months? Why is that surprising?

    are you trying to say that Obama purposely made oil $4 a gallon? because that's pretty damn funny.


    So now your claiming oil prices trend with the rest of the US economy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kershaw
    replied
    you are a toaster and i like the rain.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Non sequiturs are fun

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    you mean when the world economy hit a total standstill, we were losing 500,000+ jobs a month and oil droped by more than half in 6 months? Why is that surprising?

    are you trying to say that Obama purposely made oil $4 a gallon? because that's pretty damn funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385 View Post
    I don't know if I should be confused that this post makes no
    point and zero sense, or to be shocked you know that 2012-2009 is = 3. That's difficult math for someone like you.


    The answer is $1.84. Mr. Sleeve is correct. Keep those blinders on buddy.

    Leave a comment:


  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh View Post
    What was the price of fuel here in the states at the beginning on 09? A whopping three years ago.
    I don't know if I should be confused that this post makes no
    point and zero sense, or to be shocked you know that 2012-2009 is = 3. That's difficult math for someone like you.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385 View Post
    But there are two huge problems:

    1) You can't complain about the economy and gas prices at the same time, like joshh does. A growing economy = more people in the world who can afford to drive (or eat more protein), and thus ups the demand, and hence price. (Unless, of course, you're supporting alternative sources / efficiency - then you can grow the economy without bloating oil demand, but Catch-22 is that most people don't invest in that without high prices)

    2) $2.75 gas at the pump is correlated with an oil barrel price that is unprofitable to fuss with oil sands. (basically, Newt was full of shit)
    [edit: Yes - similar numbers as you replied with - some say as high as $70 needed to make oil sands worth it, but also read $65... and looking at historic $2.77 ~= $63/barrel]


    What was the price of fuel here in the states at the beginning on 09? A whopping three years ago.
    Last edited by joshh; 05-30-2012, 11:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve View Post
    buck sixty NO, less than 2.75 yeah very doable


    He's too busy arguing things people are not saying.

    Agreed, and it will drop again. Just not as low as 1.60 of course. Maybe when we have a President that actually wants us to have cheap energy again.
    Last edited by joshh; 05-30-2012, 11:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Oil sands are profitable at the 65ish a barrel mark (IIRC). As are most shale plays. 65 a barrel should put fuel in the 2.50-2.60 or less a gallon range again IIRC.

    We have lots of drilling going on here, ON PRIVATE land. The feds are refusing to lease, in many of the newer prime plays in this country (an buying up and decreeing protected vast swaths of them as fast as they can), including the defacto ban on new drilling in the Gulf, again by refusing to sell new leases, also dont forget the bans on east and west coasts. We can increase our own production in this country by a ton yet, if the feds would get outta the way. (You know this) This would help with both of our main issues right now, lack of good paying jobs for those outta work, and record high energy prices.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X