tell me it isn't so......the sun??

[gwb72tii]

who was to know??

i think these guys qualify as scientists..LOL

63 CERN scientists from 17 European and American institutes have done what global warming doomsayers said could never be done — demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that in Earth’s atmosphere can grow and seed clouds, the cloudier and thus cooler it will be. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere (the stronger the sun’s magnetic field, the more it shields Earth from incoming cosmic rays from space), the sun determines the temperature on Earth.

http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/08/26/lawrence-solomon-science-now-settled/

[Kershaw]

wait wait... let me get this straight...

the sun is responsible for the temperature on earth? as in... more sunlight, more heat... less sunlight, less heat?

ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT?

[Pantless Spency]

Oh chit no wai

[herbivor]

This is the source of your link:
- Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers: The world-renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution, and fraud.

Or you can just read the press release directly from CERN.

http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR15.11E.html

I'm having a hard time figuring out how Lawrence came up with his conclusions based on the CERN article.

[gwb72tii]

thanks for the link to the book
i'll see if i can download it to my iPad

obviously anyone that has written an article denying the AGW arguent cannot be trusted

[kronus]

obviously anyone that has written an article denying the AGW arguent cannot be trusted

obviously anyone that has written an article supporting the AGW argument cannot be trusted

[slammin.e28]

I am confused. I think my mind has been blown.






........fuck.

[mrsleeve]

Wow No way the sun is responsible....................................... ......who would have ever said that????

[Vedubin01]

Hey sleeve, the moon also sets the tides.... but Im no scientist!

[gwb72tii]

This is the source of your link:
- Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers: The world-renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution, and fraud.

Or you can just read the press release directly from CERN.

http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR15.11E.html

I'm having a hard time figuring out how Lawrence came up with his conclusions based on the CERN article.

you can't unless you know the context, that the two scientists tried for 10yrs to get permission.

[markseven]

That's, you guessed it, racist!!!

[Massimo]

I understand what they are saying but I would like to see results and papers on the matter.

They are not saying that when the sun gets hotter or colder the earths temp changes as well. They are saying that the sun's magnetic field is what allows more sun raze into our planet.

The whole thing about the cloud I don't know, but if there is more sun raze comming in then this shit should get hotter.

Science Stating the Obvious.

[joshh]

Talking to GW believers is like trying to prove to a Scientologist that Hubbard was never injured during WWII (even though his records can be found on line)...impossible because "it can't be".



WOW, are they actually only calling it a theory...take note IPCC....

[StereoInstaller1]

Talking to GW believers is like trying to prove to a Scientologist that Hubbard was never injured during WWII (even though his records can be found on line)...impossible because "it can't be".

I always thought his name was "Elron"

[herbivor]

you can't unless you know the context, that the two scientists tried for 10yrs to get permission.

Even if it's true, which is already uncertain based on the article you're siting, what does that have to do with anything? You do realize your link starts out "http://opinion.." right? If you were to have only read the CERN press release, there is no way you would have been able to conclude for yourself what Lawrence concluded. Yet again, you choose to site opinion articles instead of science articles to validate what you already believe. Find a real peer reviewed science article within the past year that supports your beliefs, then we can have an intelligent debate. Otherwise, you're just spreading propaganda.