Originally posted by Fusion
View Post
It would be misleading to say that only 0.7% of 11994 rejected AGW (however true it is), so they removed those who did not express an opinion. (And included those who were uncertain about the cause of global warming to the reject category)
32.6%/33.6% = 97% of those who express a position on AGW endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.
Instead of failing to understand statistics, why not try to find an explanation to the 'disappearing' energy in denier assumptions?
Comment