so why hide data, why try to ignore FOI requests, why not freely share all data and model assumptions if it's as serious as you say it is?
instead we have the majority of models not predicting anything close to reality, we have a thoroughly scientifically discredited hockey stick hypothesis which in many ways was the start of all this.
i mean your side has cried "wolf" so many times it get's old, cause we're still here, apparently doom is not in the cards, 400ppm apparently is not a magic line as we've had no warming for close to 20 years
the Dept of Energy should be a repository of data and not an employer of AGW scientists
instead we have the majority of models not predicting anything close to reality, we have a thoroughly scientifically discredited hockey stick hypothesis which in many ways was the start of all this.
i mean your side has cried "wolf" so many times it get's old, cause we're still here, apparently doom is not in the cards, 400ppm apparently is not a magic line as we've had no warming for close to 20 years
the Dept of Energy should be a repository of data and not an employer of AGW scientists
Comment