Originally posted by Wschnitz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Global Warming is over.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by nando View PostI don't drink milk anymore. Yuck. :p
I do eat cheese and dairy products though..
I don't think you'll find much to dispute that methane is worse than C02. I think the biggest risk to the climate is possibly methane thawing in the arctic/antarctica.
Seeing methane makes up ~10-15% of the greenhouse gasses, but being 20-30x more potent, not sure why everyone gets so hung up on co2. Sure, it's less by volume, but also more dangerous.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nando View Postthe doctors still recommend kids drink it - the fat content helps brain development or something. my kids sometimes go through 3-4 gallons in a week.. yeesh.
Comment
-
From that link i posted:
While methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, there is over 200 times more CO2 in the atmosphere. Hence the amount of warming methane contributes is 28% of the warming CO2 contributes.
Also the amount emitted has apparently leveled off since 2004? but that's where the data ended
Comment
-
Originally posted by LBJefferies View PostHaha ok so because humans might be able to survive a mass extinction event, it's NBD?
I'm saying it would be a blessing to the planet if we were wiped off of it.
Maybe Trump and Putin will end their bromance and press the button.Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries
www.gutenparts.com
One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BraveUlysses View PostFrom that link i posted:
While methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, there is over 200 times more CO2 in the atmosphere. Hence the amount of warming methane contributes is 28% of the warming CO2 contributes.
Also the amount emitted has apparently leveled off since 2004? but that's where the data ended
- TonyW at 17:35 PM on 10 August, 2013
Methane levels started to increase again, about 6 or 7 years ago, so this explanation needs updating.
Comment
- TonyW at 17:35 PM on 10 August, 2013
-
Raw Goat milk, especially Nigerian Dwarf Goat milk, is the best. Just saying.Estoguy
1986 BMW 325, Alpenweiss ~ "Elsa"
Need a photographer, come visit my site: http://estoguy.wix.com/unique-perspectives
Comment
-
Originally posted by BraveUlysses View PostFrom that link i posted:
While methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, there is over 200 times more CO2 in the atmosphere. Hence the amount of warming methane contributes is 28% of the warming CO2 contributes.
Also the amount emitted has apparently leveled off since 2004? but that's where the data ended
the AGW hypothesis is rooted in models with no empirical data to support their many hypotheses
correlation is not causation“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
so brave, you do know the IPCC which started all this was formed to study the effects man is having on global warming. It was not set up to try and find what the cause is.
And low and behold we have study upon study supporting the IPCC's initial bias that man is responsible for global warming (see confirmation bias).
20 years later global warming is a multi hundred billion dollar business. Scientists who disagree with the hypothesis cannot get peer reviewed, cannot get published and cannot get tenure. Any debate is stifled. You may agree with all this but then you cannot describe it as science. its a circle jerk.
and to further my point, here is another example, in diet
i found this article in the reading i do daily. it's about a couple of your generation that cares about science and is a really interesting read about someone that has the means and money trying to do good.
towards the end of the article is a reference to a book written by Gary Taubes (Good Calories, Bad Calories) about replicating studies in diet
here is a synopsis on the work done by Taubes
file:///C:/Users/user/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/8FHWGNUS/notes-to-good-calories-bad-calories.pdf
the problems in the studies on fat and carbohydrates in our diet are an exact description of what passes for government funded climate science. there is no science involved.
so your side of the argument that has cried "wolf" for 20 years gets to reap what it has sewed, Trump, and the defunding of climate science by the government. no more grants.
it could not have happened soon enough.“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Originally posted by gwb72tii View Postso brave, you do know the IPCC which started all this was formed to study the effects man is having on global warming. It was not set up to try and find what the cause is.
And low and behold we have study upon study supporting the IPCC's initial bias that man is responsible for global warming (see confirmation bias).
20 years later global warming is a multi hundred billion dollar business. Scientists who disagree with the hypothesis cannot get peer reviewed, cannot get published and cannot get tenure. Any debate is stifled. You may agree with all this but then you cannot describe it as science. its a circle jerk.
and to further my point, here is another example, in diet
i found this article in the reading i do daily. it's about a couple of your generation that cares about science and is a really interesting read about someone that has the means and money trying to do good.
towards the end of the article is a reference to a book written by Gary Taubes (Good Calories, Bad Calories) about replicating studies in diet
here is a synopsis on the work done by Taubes
file:///C:/Users/user/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/8FHWGNUS/notes-to-good-calories-bad-calories.pdf
the problems in the studies on fat and carbohydrates in our diet are an exact description of what passes for government funded climate science. there is no science involved.
so your side of the argument that has cried "wolf" for 20 years gets to reap what it has sewed, Trump, and the defunding of climate science by the government. no more grants.
it could not have happened soon enough.1989 BMW 325is | 2019 Ford Ranger FX4willschnitz
Comment
Comment