Global Warming is over.

[parkerbink]

so a follow up question:

why would any scientist insist on hiding the data he/she has used to model climate projections?

What scientist is?

As a rule they want to be published.

[gwb72tii]

apparently these scientists didn't get the message that the science is settled:

Peer reviewed charts showing long cycle temperatures

https://www.thegwpf.com/flood-of-new-scientific-papers-show-surprising-results/

[parkerbink]

apparently these scientists didn't get the message that the science is settled:

Peer reviewed charts showing long cycle temperatures

https://www.thegwpf.com/flood-of-new...ising-results/

Shame you aren't 0.0000000000001% as good at understanding facts as you are at finding fringe partisan articles.

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/02/nigel-lawson-climate-sceptic-organisation-funders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation

[mbonder]

I don't think that the Global Warming Policy Foundation is a reliable source for scientific information given that they don't actually do any research, they simply pick and choose data that appears to favor their denier objective.

There isn't a hint of unbiasedness there.

[cale]

It doesn't have to be reliable, it just has to reaffirm his delusions.

[gwb72tii]

Shame you aren't 0.0000000000001% as good at understanding facts as you are at finding fringe partisan articles.

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/02/nigel-lawson-climate-sceptic-organisation-funders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global...icy_Foundation

wow the pot calls the kettle black. you're so far in left field you can't see the ballpark any longer Parker. That you would link to the above shows your bias, and that you can't see it, while not surprising, is evidence of your biases.

wikipedia is not a reference source of anything

[parkerbink]

wow the pot calls the kettle black. you're so far in left field you can't see the ballpark any longer Parker. That you would link to the above shows your bias, and that you can't see it, while not surprising, is evidence of your biases.

wikipedia is not a reference source of anything

Wow really? What is Wikipedia then?

Jesus

[Massive Lee]

wikipedia is not a reference source of anything

And the Bible and FoxNews are? :devil:

[z31maniac]

wow the pot calls the kettle black. you're so far in left field you can't see the ballpark any longer Parker. That you would link to the above shows your bias, and that you can't see it, while not surprising, is evidence of your biases.

wikipedia is not a reference source of anything

That's weird the Wiki you linked has more than 40 sources at the bottom from The Guardian, BBC, The London Times, etc.

[Wschnitz]

You guys shouldn't really even entertain Georges rants, he is in no place to lecture on source credibility.

[gwb72tii]

settled science

more evidence that global warming is settled science, except it's not LOL

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2018/04/24/did_you_know_the_greatest_two-year_global_cooling_event_just_took_place_103243.html

[gwb72tii]

and with a belated Happy Earth Day, with a track record like the following, why is it anyone listens to scientists like Michael Mann and James Hansen:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/04/21/18-examples-of-the-spectacularly-wrong-predictions-made-around-the-first-earth-day-in-1970/

[cale]

more evidence that global warming is settled science, except it's not LOL

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/art...ce_103243.html

Aren't you an engineer? Being this bad at statistics lol

[parkerbink]

Found the report that will stop George dead in his tracks and make him come to Jesus.

[Massive Lee]

Today is 60°F. Tomorrow is 55°F. This is the only proof that George needs so that he can claim that Earth is cooling down and that global warming is a hoax. ;-)