It is true that climatologists may discover evidence that determines the current global warming trends are not man-made. I would hope they do. It is also true that archaeologists may find evidence that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. You cannot disprove a negative. However, their is overwhelming evidence (by which I mean real scientific evidence and not propaganda) that current Global Warming trends are, if not all, at least partially due by man and there is also enough prior and current evidence to determine statistically within a margin of error what the impact will be. Now statistically speaking, even the most conservative side of the bell curve (look it up if you are having trouble following) predicts some pretty drastic climatic changes that will impact many people's living situation pretty dramatically.
When the science and the math and the evidence is overwhelming, it is the duty of people to act responsibly. When a meteorolgists tells you a class 5 hurricane is about to destroy your home, you don't argue whether it may be a only a class 2 or 3 or whether a hurricane is coming at all and play the odds everthing will be ok. You get the fuck out of there.
The wind is blowing my friend. You just need to open the door an look around.
When the science and the math and the evidence is overwhelming, it is the duty of people to act responsibly. When a meteorolgists tells you a class 5 hurricane is about to destroy your home, you don't argue whether it may be a only a class 2 or 3 or whether a hurricane is coming at all and play the odds everthing will be ok. You get the fuck out of there.
The wind is blowing my friend. You just need to open the door an look around.
Comment