Obama will veto anti-net neutrality legislation

[joshh]

Sorry, it just sounds like you have a fundamental misunderstanding as to what net neutrality is, or you can't articulate your point very well.

What does "Net Neutrality" mean to you?

What does the Patriot act mean to you? Is it *patriotic* because it says it's patriotic? If you don't understand what I mean now, the fundamental misunderstanding is on your part.

[BraveUlysses]

Can't answer a simple question? Deflect, deflect, deflect.

[joshh]

Can't answer a simple question? Deflect, deflect, deflect.

That was hardly a deflection. You just have to be smart enough to get the point. Which I've made more than clear.

[Jaxx_]

Can't answer a simple question? Deflect, deflect, deflect.

:rofl:

So anyway, net neutrality isn't a bill. It's a concept. It's the same idea as civil rights and equality. Anyone who has a brain should realize that net neutrality is good because sites like r3v(and any website that anyone wants to create) can be visited by anyone in the world that has access to the internet. edit: net neutrality can be considered similar to anti-trust as well.

If you fundamentally think that the internet should be biased to what sites you can visit/not visit I don't think you should be living in the US.


I think that net neutrality is aligned with your views Joshh, but your views are too clouded to see that--Or you simply don't understand the concept.(I believe the latter because you simply deflected the question about defining net neutrality)

[BraveUlysses]

That was hardly a deflection. You just have to be smart enough to get the point. Which I've made more than clear.

The only person who thinks you are good at communicating your point is you.

[joshh]

:rofl:

So anyway, net neutrality isn't a bill. It's a concept. It's the same idea as civil rights and equality. Anyone who has a brain should realize that net neutrality is good because sites like r3v(and any website that anyone wants to create) can be visited by anyone in the world that has access to the internet. edit: net neutrality can be considered similar to anti-trust as well.

If you fundamentally think that the internet should be biased to what sites you can visit/not visit I don't think you should be living in the US.


I think that net neutrality is aligned with your views Joshh, but your views are too clouded to see that--Or you simply don't understand the concept.(I believe the latter because you simply deflected the question about defining net neutrality)

So you admit it's unconstitutional. That's a good start. No it's not a bill but it should have been.

It's not about the sites it's about ISPs.
So you find out your ISP is blocking some of the places/content you want. What do you do then. Hint-change ISP's. The internet has existed for a very long time without the need to interfere like this. Smart ISPs don't block content or their competitors get more cash. That's called the free market self correcting itself.

Are you in favor of the Government telling businesses how to run *their* business? Just keep bailing them out when they fuck up badly as well right?

There's a difference between the Government interfering when companies are doing immoral shit (fucking the customer) and interfering when companies are doing things that are a simple bad business discussion.

The only person who thinks you are good at communicating your point is you.

It's always the left (you for example) I have to spell it out for.

[Jaxx_]

hopeless. this is my last reply in this thread.

[mrsleeve]

http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv30n3/v30n3-3.pdf

just leave this here