Benghazi-Gate?

[mrsleeve]

not going to happen, she will be a good little progressive and to put into chess terms, she will sacrifice her self to pull her king out of check.........................

[Eric]

Apparently, bill is tired of Obama using her as the sticky after sex wipe up rag, and want her to spill some damaging information she has about what really happened the night of the attack.

[mrsleeve]

This will never stick to the 0. This is why billery is falling on her sword....... no matter what comes to light it will never stick or come back to him, just like F&F

[Eric]

http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/ro...over-benghazi/


A general fired over this?

Read that earlier today. Also Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette was relieved of command of his striker group about the same time as the AFRICOM commander was relieved. Who know's if it's related or not.

This is a bit tin-foil hat... But I read that Obama wanted the ambassador kidnapped, so he could negotiate a swap with somebody that we are holding and be considered a hero right before the election...

Back to reality...
This timeline of the attack is a really good read: http://news.yahoo.com/benghazi-timel...-politics.html

This is long, but also a good read:

http://blackwaterusa.com/low-profile-in-benghazi-when-political-correctness-kills?utm_source=Oct+26+BTW&utm_campaign=BTW+Oct+27&utm_medium=email

[Vedubin01]

This is some fucked up shit!



The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

Read more: TRR: Is a General losing his job over Benghazi? - Washington Times http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/ro...#ixzz2Af8z7psP
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

[joshh]

http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/ro...over-benghazi/


A general fired over this?

[gwb72tii]

the pres said he issued orders to protect the embassy personnel
someone did not comply with a directive from the pres?
who?

[joshh]

I can not imagine the President wasn't told what was going on all night long and went to bed totally ignorant of what had happened. Is that what's being suggested?

[Vedubin01]

[Eric]

Penetta's press conference stating that the CIA never refused the requests. Seams to me like that was a punch back at the Obama camp after joe's "We didn't know" remark during the debate.

The requests were denied, but by who?

[gwb72tii]

so i'm wondering specifically with all that's come to light recently if all you all that support he president have changed your opinion about barack?
1. live video feed to the situation room in the WH of the battle as its happening
2. Sec of Defense Panetta visiting the WH during the battle
3. Claims of responsibility by al-qaeda affiliated group for the attack, during the attack
4. CIA requesting aid during the fight, three times
5. CIA being told to stand down, three times
6. CIA "painting" the mortar with laser that's being used to shell the ambassador's house, and the c131 gunship not being allowed to fire, even though its designed specifically for that type of situation. this mortar later kills the CIA operative by shelling the CIA safe house.
7. the President now refusing to answer questions from reporters any longer about the firefight

does anyone care that the media could care less as it's obama, but if it were bill clinton they'd be all over his ass with questions?
does anyone care the pres has been misleading all of us on this?

[gwb72tii]

An anti-American sentiment was stirred up among a portion of the Middle East's population by rabble-rousers reporting that the anti-Muslim film posted to youtube was a (US) state sponsored video. That was the initial cause of the outrage and it seems that various militias, and possibly al-Qaeda, channeled that outrage into an attack on our embassy. Now, the deeper cause of the outrage is the economic strife in that region, itself caused by massively surging food prices and the recent political instability, combined with the higher volatility and tendency towards violence that Muslims have shown to have.

care to re-think this post?

[M-technik-3]

This seems to not play well for the current administration.

[M-technik-3]

Jon Stewart’s Take On The Libya That Every Single American Needs To See

http://www.ijreview.com/2012/10/1806...-needs-to-see/

To make light of it, Stewart's bit was funny but spot on.

[Thizzelle]

An anti-American sentiment was stirred up among a portion of the Middle East's population by rabble-rousers reporting that the anti-Muslim film posted to youtube was a (US) state sponsored video. That was the initial cause of the outrage and it seems that various militias, and possibly al-Qaeda, channeled that outrage into an attack on our embassy. Now, the deeper cause of the outrage is the economic strife in that region, itself caused by massively surging food prices and the recent political instability, combined with the higher volatility and tendency towards violence that Muslims have shown to have.

so blind outrage, thanks for clearing that up.