Benghazi-Gate?

[tjts1]

Because its Obama's fault, obviously. Fox is just being fair and balanced.

[ethrtyiS]

quite simple. benghazi is a man made disaster that could have been prevented! sandy on the other hand is a natural disaster, that we can only prepare for in a short amount of time without knowing how truly damaging the disaster will be.

what news are you watching that he hasn't answered a single question from the press in 23 days?

[mar1t1me]

Can someone actually tell me why this story has even trumped Hurricane Sandy on Fox? Sandy killed more than 20 times the number of people killed in Benghazi, but Fox still hammers away at Benghazi like the fate of Western Civilization depends on it.

I find it interesting that as the Benghazi story has been provided as fertile fodder for those ever willing to jump to conclusions, Romney has not answered a single question from the press in 23 days.

[ethrtyiS]

he's lying about it all. the question is why and for what? if obama doesn't come clean on what happened there before the election and (god forbid) he were to win re-election, and we find there was some sort of cover up, i believe that should be grounds for impeachment.

[gwb72tii]

he's screwing with you

question
is obama lying about the directive to secure, or lying about not issuing a stand down order impeachable?

[ethrtyiS]

i can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not...
i don't like the mans policies and i don't like how he's handled a lot of situations.
how is that being racist?

[z31maniac]

You're just a racist.

[ethrtyiS]

In an interview with a Denver TV reporter Friday, President Obama twice refused to answer questions as to whether the Americans under siege in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, were denied requests for help, saying he’s waiting for the results of investigations before making any conclusions about what went wrong.

After being asked about possible denials of requests for aid, and whether it’s fair to tell Americans that what happened is under investigation and won’t be released until after the election, the president said, “the election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened. These are folks who served under me who I had sent to some very dangerous places. Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do.”

President Obama told KUSA-TV’s Kyle Clarke large that “we want to make sure we get it right, particularly because I have made a commitment to the families impacted as well as to the American people, we’re going to bring those folks to justice. So, we’re going to gather all the facts, find out exactly what happened, and make sure that it doesn't happen again but we’re also going to make sure that we bring to justice those who carried out these attacks.”

Clark pressed again. “Were they denied requests for help during the attack?” he asked.

“Well, we are finding out exactly what happened,” the president again said. “I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we’re going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we’re going to find out exactly what happened, but what we’re also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.”

Earlier today, Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin reported that CIA agents in the second U.S. compound in Benghazi were denied requests for help.

In response, CIA spokesperson Jennifer Youngblood said, “We can say with confidence that the Agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi. Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. In fact, it is important to remember how many lives were saved by courageous Americans who put their own safety at risk that night-and that some of those selfless Americans gave their lives in the effort to rescue their comrades.”

that's a lawyer speaking, not a commander in chief. he knew what was going on. if reagan was in the oval office and had this happen, he wouldn't have ran to vegas for a fund raiser within 24 hours of the attack laughing and cutting jokes.


1. who talks like this? did he order, as a commander in chief, the military to do everything possible to protect our personnel right there and then? no, the secretary of defense said they needed to figure out what was going on. you see, their little stories aren't matching up.

2. his number 2 directive was to investigate exactly what happened so it doesn't happen again. does that make sense? they just told him what was going on, and he supposedly "ordered" to protect our personnel and he needs to investigate? when a president knows what's happening, you don't go investigate to see what's happening, you go protect right there and then.

3. find out who did this? we know we are being attacked...so while the attacks are occurring, lets find out who did it so we can bring them to justice. is this how a normal commander in chief thinks, acts and talks? no. he's lying. he's covering up.

those three things don't make any sense. he is such a liar and it's so hard to stomach it.

"everyone in the state department, our military, cia, you name it had number one priority making sure people were safe." how did he even know that? i thought they were still investigating. obviously it wasn't number 1 priority for safety because they were denied help and 4 men died because of it and many injured.

[M-technik-3]

Hmmm and a former Gitmo inmate might have lead the attack.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/09/20/gitmo-inmate-may-have-led-benghazi-attack.html?comp=7000023467940&rank=3

[Vedubin01]

Wrong is wrong, either side.


add something to the advertisement, looks like Facebook is helping the campaign.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/30/Facebook-Censors-Navy-SEALS-To-Protect-Obama-on-Benghazi-Gate

[markseven]

.....Reminds me of another infamous stand-down order issued during 9/11 because some one did not want the fighter pilots to visually identify the type of aircraft involved.....

.....what did they not want seen here? That's what I want to know. Maybe the whole thing was a failure....?

Boosh!

[mar1t1me]

.....Reminds me of another infamous stand-down order issued during 9/11 because some one did not want the fighter pilots to visually identify the type of aircraft involved.....

.....what did they not want seen here? That's what I want to know. Maybe the whole thing was a failure....?

[Vedubin01]

its been turned into a campaign ad but its pretty explosive!

[M-technik-3]

Apparently, bill is tired of Obama using her as the sticky after sex wipe up rag, and want her to spill some damaging information she has about what really happened the night of the attack.

not going to happen, she will be a good little progressive and to put into chess terms, she will sacrifice her self to pull her king out of check.........................

I don't think so, the Clintons have always been uno-via aka one-way street or all about themselves. After this her shot at getting elected is slim and she wants the chance to be in office.

No we have fast reaction teams set up all around the middle east. One of the reasons I was so busy last month.

[gwb72tii]

not going to happen, she will be a good little progresive and to put into chess terms, she will sacerfice her self to pull her king out of check.........................

its a political decision not to to expose the messiah. if she did, she would be toast for the 2016 presidential nomination.

And, whoever made the decision to have our forces stand down should be easy to find out. Presidential directives are done on paper in situations like this, plus emails etc. There would be a paper trail that would lead to whoever is responsible.

If there is a directive that is. Wonder if the messiah knew there would be a paper trail before opening his mouth?