Good gun control policy in CA

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bimmerteck
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    No, those damn tasty animals are clearly the root cause of all the gun violence in California. People keep confusing others for deer.

    What is the root of the problem? India has more people, with just as many psychos (and hunters, maybe?), but less gun violence. Guns are banned in Singapore and I can't remember the last time I read about a shooting death there.

    What is going on there that we can't figure out?
    The key to Singapore's crime enforcement is the people. It's not the cops, or the legislators, it's the average citizen going out to their way to stop crime on all levels by reporting to the police via the crime watch programs.

    Where as in California and much of the US you essentially have a state sponsored criminal class that isn't afraid of being cheating the system, in fact they are often proud of it. Combined with a populous that thinks it's not their problem supported by underlying moral issues in the last few generations.

    California pays out more in the form of EBT, food Stamps, and WIC than almost any other state. I think that and immigration policy are a big chunk of your crime problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by bimmerteck
    I only stated that GUN CONTROL legislation wont fix your crime problem b/c the guns are not the root of that problem.
    No, those damn tasty animals are clearly the root cause of all the gun violence in California. People keep confusing others for deer.

    What is the root of the problem? India has more people, with just as many psychos (and hunters, maybe?), but less gun violence. Guns are banned in Singapore and I can't remember the last time I read about a shooting death there.

    What is going on there that we can't figure out?

    Leave a comment:


  • bimmerteck
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Your weird circular logic notwithstanding, show me evidence that this legislation will not have any impact. I don't think it aims to halt criminal activity in its tracks for good forever because race car.

    Also, throwing your hands up and saying nothing can be done is really un-American.
    Where did I say that we should throw our hands up and do nothing?

    I only stated that GUN CONTROL legislation wont fix your crime problem b/c the guns are not the root of that problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr Faust Schinken
    replied
    I'm a Californian and I own guns at least brown didn't, completely tow the line on this one, also at least if you go hunting the animal has a chance to escape, it's not like at a slaughter mill where they don't even have a chance

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by MF DOOM
    Theres your answer. The majority of you are idiots and/or passive pussies. Since I know your'e going to twist it and act like I said all Californians are idiots I'll go into detail and say I met a lot of good people when I was living there. But the ratio of humble, intelligent folk to the ostentatious dick bags that think they're famous is like 100000:1.

    But whatever man. Hunting animals is mean and the government should pay for my vegan diet.
    Yawn.

    Leave a comment:


  • MF DOOM
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    I'm pretty sure that crafting policy based on the extended range ballistics of killing defenseless animals and other hillbilly past times made sense in the 1860s or wherever it is you live, but in California a lot of guns are used to shoot people and not dinner.

    Since you cannot legislate away the reproductive rights of the criminal class, it makes sense to limit their ability to kill and maim other people....in whichever way can be done.
    Theres your answer. The majority of you are idiots and/or passive pussies. Since I know your'e going to twist it and act like I said all Californians are idiots I'll go into detail and say I met a lot of good people when I was living there. But the ratio of humble, intelligent folk to the ostentatious dick bags that think they're famous is like 100000:1.

    But whatever man. Hunting animals is mean and the government should pay for my vegan diet.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Are you in the Taliban?
    No, he's clearly a Nazi though. Only Nazi's like to hunt.

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by bimmerteck
    Criminals are criminals because they break the laws.
    Will this new legislation change that? No.
    Can your police effectively enforce the current gun laws already on the books? No.
    Why pass more gun control laws when the current laws so clearly aren't working or can't be enforced.
    Your weird circular logic notwithstanding, show me evidence that this legislation will not have any impact. I don't think it aims to halt criminal activity in its tracks for good forever because race car.

    Also, throwing your hands up and saying nothing can be done is really un-American.

    Leave a comment:


  • bimmerteck
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    I'm pretty sure that crafting policy based on the extended range ballistics of killing defenseless animals and other hillbilly past times made sense in the 1860s or wherever it is you live, but in California a lot of guns are used to shoot people and not dinner.

    Since you cannot legislate away the reproductive rights of the criminal class, it makes sense to limit their ability to kill and maim other people....in whichever way can be done.

    Criminals are criminals because they break the laws.
    Will this new legislation change that? No.
    Can your police effectively enforce the current gun laws already on the books? No.
    Why pass more gun control laws when the current laws so clearly aren't working or can't be enforced.

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by frankenbeemer
    Cutting their hands off would limit their ability to kill and maim.
    Are you in the Taliban?

    Leave a comment:


  • frankenbeemer
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    I'm pretty sure that crafting policy based on the extended range ballistics of killing defenseless animals and other hillbilly past times made sense in the 1860s or wherever it is you live, but in California a lot of guns are used to shoot people and not dinner.

    Since you cannot legislate away the reproductive rights of the criminal class, it makes sense to limit their ability to kill and maim other people....in whichever way can be done.
    Cutting their hands off would limit their ability to kill and maim.

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    Spoken like a true liberal and city slicker
    I'm pretty sure that crafting policy based on the extended range ballistics of killing defenseless animals and other hillbilly past times made sense in the 1860s or wherever it is you live, but in California a lot of guns are used to shoot people and not dinner.

    Since you cannot legislate away the reproductive rights of the criminal class, it makes sense to limit their ability to kill and maim other people....in whichever way can be done.

    Leave a comment:


  • frankenbeemer
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Lead is bad for the environment, dick.

    And hunting is lame.
    Just quit driving, or kill yourself, you'll be helping the environment.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Lead is bad for the environment, dick.

    And hunting is lame.
    Spoken like a true liberal and city slicker

    Leave a comment:


  • jrobie79
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Lead is bad for the environment, dick.

    And hunting is lame.
    lead is bad for the environment, and mass slaughterhouses are good for animals and doped up livestock is good for humans!

    because narrative

    Leave a comment:

Working...