Pro-gun myths busted

[einhander]

I'll troll. You fantasize.

[ParsedOut]

Says the guy who thinks:

A) Poor people are stupid and lazy.
B) Other countries are going to invade the United States.
C) Illegal immigrants are scam artists.
D) To Terrorize and to be a terrorist are one and the same.


Hilarious.

Haha! True on A. B and D are an oversimplification. Regarding C, I never said or implied any thing of the sort. Troll on my friend...

[einhander]

...he lives in a world of black and white and walks around with one eye closed. Anything that doesn't fit his myopic view is lunacy...

Says the guy who thinks:

A) Poor people are stupid and lazy.
B) Other countries are going to invade the United States.
C) Illegal immigrants are scam artists.
D) To Terrorize and to be a terrorist are one and the same.


Hilarious.

[ParsedOut]

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...uns-everywhere

So...two guys got into a disagreement, one person postured with a gun and the confrontation ended without incident? Sounds way less violent than all of the muggings, robberies and street fights that happen on a daily basis around the country. What's your point?

[smooth]

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/georgia-showdown-guns-everywhere

[Ether-D]

I totally sniff my own farts. I'm usually impressed, and/or a little offended.

[marshallnoise]

It's not the only point I've picked out, it's simply the latest cause you all have jumped on. Every time you ramble incoherently I point out the logical errors and inconsistencies, you and a few others try to buttress your positions to no avail, then abandon the point in lieu of something else you've picked up from the blogosphere. That's the trend of the past month in these few threads I've been participating within.

In case you were wondering, this is the self-fart sniffing superiority complex we are referring to when we give you shit about the ivory tower.

Especially since you have your own definition of logical errors and inconsistencies. Well, that's more an arrogance complex, but, it is tied into the superiority complex on display.

[marshallnoise]

Still fucking that chicken?

OMG!!! I am dying here! That was comedy gold! :rofl:

[ParsedOut]

I don't think you're in the same conversation we're in. Why don't you call me on all my "logical errors" and "inconsistencies"?

This smooth guy does the same thing he is accusing us of, he backpeddles with supposed "offense" or "I'm smarter than you, so you must not be explaining yourself" or grasping at straws to try to support his views. When that doesn't work, he bails out and then starts picking and choosing what he'll use to start another unfounded attack. Occasionally he shows glimmers of hope and understanding but more often than not he's just as bad as we supposedly are.

Corvallis on the other hand, he lives in a world of black and white and walks around with one eye closed. Anything that doesn't fit his myopic view is lunacy...

[ParsedOut]

How can you claim to believe in something so strongly when you don't even understand how it operates?

You're just throwing around conceptual catch-phrases at this point.

I haven't said anything to show that I'm ignorant to how due process operates unlike you and Corvallis on many of the other gun control topics that have been discussed. You still think the government is illegally capturing NICS info and compiling illegal hidden registries? If you recall, that was your reason for not disputing an official registry to support universal background checks. Your reasoning and backpeddling is nothing but entertaining.

[The Dark Side of Will]

I point out the logical errors and inconsistencies, you and a few others try to buttress your positions to no avail, then abandon the point in lieu of something else you've picked up from the blogosphere.

I don't think you're in the same conversation we're in. Why don't you call me on all my "logical errors" and "inconsistencies"?

[smooth]

Due process as written in the Constitution and due process as executed currently are different things.

SCOTUS has ruled that most Bill of Rights protections don't apply if you're not facing jail time. This allows the travesty of civil property seizure (Google it, I'm not going to write 500 words because you're lazy) to occur.

Is civil property seizure right because it's legal? HELL to the NO.

Interesting that due process is the only discussion point of several that you picked out.

I do hope you see how scary an elected official saying "take now, figure it out later" is. As Farbin mentions above... later doesn't happen.

It's not the only point I've picked out, it's simply the latest cause you all have jumped on. Every time you ramble incoherently I point out the logical errors and inconsistencies, you and a few others try to buttress your positions to no avail, then abandon the point in lieu of something else you've picked up from the blogosphere. That's the trend of the past month in these few threads I've been participating within.

[The Dark Side of Will]

^ Because when you strip away the rights of child molestors and wife beaters, then all you gotta do is accuse someone of being either and you can snuff them out without anyone looking twice.

Just like calling someone a "terrorist".

Oh... that's happening right now.

[The Dark Side of Will]

You and he need to quit throwing that term around so loosely. Farbin seems to be the only one using is correctly out of the three of you.

Due process as written in the Constitution and due process as executed currently are different things.

SCOTUS has ruled that most Bill of Rights protections don't apply if you're not facing jail time. This allows the travesty of civil property seizure (Google it, I'm not going to write 500 words because you're lazy) to occur.

Is civil property seizure right because it's legal? HELL to the NO.

Interesting that due process is the only discussion point of several that you picked out.

I do hope you see how scary an elected official saying "take now, figure it out later" is. As Farbin mentions above... later doesn't happen.

[smooth]

How can you claim to believe in something so strongly when you don't even understand how it operates?

You're just throwing around conceptual catch-phrases at this point.