Israelis in Gaza or Ferguson, MO?

[slaterd]

^ racist.

I know, I can't help bringing facts to the table. Unfortunate that I'm white and can't say anything about them. Best be quiet and let Al Sharpton and Jackson get away with mass media racism...again.

[smooth]

And another witness just came around saying that Brown did not have his hands in the air but was actually still walking towards the cops just like what the "Arizona faction" had been saying the whole time.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/c...88ec79349.html

looks like you accidentally linked an article that undermines your position there, bud; might want to dig up the one you meant to post so we can get to the heart of this "conspiracy"

[BraveUlysses]

More facts than what the rioters in Ferguson are going off of.

So with the lack of evidence it's better to justify these riots and calling for this man's head on a spike than to wait until facts come out?
That's calling the kettle black if I've ever seen it. When evidence starts coming out proving the officer's shooting was justified then "oh we need to wait until the evidence comes out. But until then we want his blood." That's the most ignorant, backwards social thinking I've ever seen.

Nobody is justifying or rationalizing riots you simpleton.

Are you saying people shouldn't be allowed to protest?

I know, I can't help bringing facts to the table. Unfortunate that I'm white and can't say anything about them. Best be quiet and let Al Sharpton and Jackson get away with mass media racism...again.
[ATTACH]90258[/ATTACH]

what is "mass media racism"?

[slaterd]

looks like you accidentally linked an article that undermines your position there, bud; might want to dig up the one you meant to post so we can get to the heart of this "conspiracy"

No that was it. Just because he believes it was "cold blooded murder"doesn't mean it was. Not to mention his own testimonial not only goes against what the other witnesses were saying about his hands being up, which is a load of shit, but his testimony also confirms the police officer's story and the autopsy report. Just because he believes it was cold blooded murder because it was a white cop shooting a brotha doesn't mean it wasn't justified. You reach for a cop's gun, which is what the autopsy report shows, then you're getting shot, If after that struggle you continue towards the cop and don't stop, you're going to DIE. It doesn't matter the color of your skin, However, Ferguson and the black community (not all of it) have their feathers ruffled up because it was a white cop shooting a black cop. The whole "hands up" protest is bullshit and only made to make Brown look like an innocent when in fact he was a big thug who manhandled people and someone who is stupid enough to reach for a cop's gun.
Even the police officers there at this point aren't there to help maintain the protests and riots. They're there just to protect themselves. I support our officers, NOT a fucking bully of a thug. And the riots just show how devolved the community has become to think that this is something that is allowed. Your thug friend got shot because he was a bully, assaulted a police, tried to take his gun, and would not stop. Of course he got shot. "But it was racism!" Fuck off. It's called common sense and understanding of how to be a productive citizen that abides by the law...give it a try and see how police officers will treat you. Just try it you may be surprised to find out that the police aren't really that bad.

[BraveUlysses]

ahh good you went full police bootlicker in that post, nice job

[slaterd]

Nobody is justifying or rationalizing riots you simpleton.

Then why are they continuing dumb ass?

Are you saying people shouldn't be allowed to protest?

I didn't say that. The basis of these riots is just pure ignorance though and shows just how devolved this community is. "We're protesting the police shooting our brotha who assaulted the officer and tried taking his gun! We're fed up with racism!" That is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. I thought the black community couldn't stoop any lower on pulling out race cards after Treyvon Martin, sure as fuck I was wrong. The message those riots are supporting is "support our local thugs, not the police officers who try to make our towns safer:. If I were the PD I would pull out of neighborhoods like these and let them try to police themselves. Once the neighborhood is basically destroyed from drug dealers and gang bangers, demolish the old houses and rebuild a better neighborhood.

what is "mass media racism"?

Read up on all the black and white crime statistics. You'll find nearly all black on white crimes is swept under the rug and made out as a statistic, even if there is pure racism (with real evidence) backing it up. Then look at all of the white on black crimes and how involved Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton get. What about the support programs for black people? If those programs existed for white people then they would be deemed as racism. A black guy in public can call a white guy a cracker but a white guy can't call him a n----. See I can't even post on here. I would be "punished" for my freedom of speech where as a black person can say whatever the fuck they want. Open your damn eyes! It is everywhere.

[BraveUlysses]

You've gone full retard


I mean seriously? You're complaining that you can't call someone a n-word? UGH WHITE PEOPLE ARE SO OPPRESSED THAT ITS NO LONGER PUBLICLY ACCEPTABLE TO CALL BLACK PEOPLE THE NWORD

[slaterd]

Lol, I'm not complaining. I did that to prove a point and you just made it.
A better answer would be "no one should be able to say any racial slurs to anyone."
But no let's just concentrate on the white man saying the nword, not the brother calling every white person around him
honky or cracker. Nah that would be oppressive.

[BraveUlysses]

Lol, I'm not complaining. I did that to prove a point and you just made it.
A better answer would be "no one should be able to say any racial slurs to anyone."
But no let's just concentrate on the white man saying the nword, not the brother calling every white person around him
honky or cracker. Nah that would be oppressive.

How often have you been called either of those words? this is so laughably stupid, but i'm glad you've outed yourself

[slaterd]

Actually just last week thanks for asking

[slaterd]

If you're implying me outing myself as being a racist then fine, I guess there's no satisfying you Brave unless the white man who speaks out is deemed a racist. Congrats on being one too bud.

[smooth]

I mean seriously? You're complaining that you can't call someone a n-word? UGH WHITE PEOPLE ARE SO OPPRESSED THAT ITS NO LONGER PUBLICLY ACCEPTABLE TO CALL BLACK PEOPLE THE NWORD

you just don't understand how tough it is being in his shoes

regardless, it's rather sad and pathetic the lack of scientific knowledge these guys express in these forums day in and day out

[BraveUlysses]

If you're implying me outing myself as being a racist then fine, I guess there's no satisfying you Brave unless the white man who speaks out is deemed a racist. Congrats on being one too bud.

Really, I'm truly sorry it's not acceptable for you to call someone a n----r back after you were called a cracker.

PS you're not "speaking out" against anything but keep fuckin that chicken

[CorvallisBMW]

did not read, did it mention the blood evidence found on the officers weapon and IN the fucking cop car, like I read from CNN a few nights ago ???

Because Brown was hit during the initial struggle in the car window when he reached for the cop's gun.

Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco, told the newspaper the autopsy indicates Brown was "reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound." She added, "If he has his hand near the gun when it goes off, he's going for the officer's gun."

I think what you're both forgetting is that this part of the altercation was never in question. Everyone knew that there was an altercation in/near the cruiser's window, and that Brown and the cop fought/struggled during the altercation, and that the officer's weapon was discharged at that time. This evidence fits the narrative that's already been played over and over, and no one is denying it. This evidence does not contradict the witness reports or the narrative so far.

The reason people in Ferguson, and across America, are upset is because the officer then further shot Brown, repeatedly, from a significant distance. Witness reports say that Brown was running away with his back towards the officer when he was shot. He then stopped, turned around and raised his hands before being shot again. The autopsy performed on Brown by the pathologist hired by his family showed clear evidence of this, and the new autopsy does nothing to discredit the previous one or the witness accounts.

So, why exactly are you guys all excited?

[mrsleeve]

I was not making a point just asking if this article was talking about the same thing as the one I had read previously from another reputable source....

What is a significant distance that is too far away to be shooting someone. Remembering the fact that the average human can cover 20 Feet in 1 second from a dead stop............


The autopsy reports I saw were saying all shots entered the body from the FRONT, hard to be shot in the back form the front.......



Edit: why are there 6 eye witness that collaborate Wilsons version of events that now fear what "their" community will do to them if they testify, as I just heard on Nightly National (network not cable) news program about 3 mins ago.