this was just a case of work place violence right ?????????
-
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de TocquevilleOriginally posted by Fusion
The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
William Pitt- -
At least two of them were French nationals, the one that got killed by the cops during a rare I am not sure of. But they were Muslim and all the witnesses said they were shouting praise God and the profit is avenged.sigpic
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."
Comment
-
"the rules you make for your club do not apply to those who are not in your club"
sigpic
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."
Comment
-
Really? You obliviously aren't up to date on foreign affairs are you? France and Islam are practically enemies right now. France has a lot of Muslims immigrating into the country and basically forcing the French to adhere or respect their demands. The French are extremely, and I mean EXTREMELY racist towards Muslims...and for a good reason too. Take a trip to France one day and ask someone about what is going on with Muslim immigrants. You'll get a better understanding of how open minded thinking would eventually lead to the destruction of the original culture.Originally posted by Wh33lhopComment
-
It doesn't matter about how many in a group do it. What matters is what group do these instances typically come from. That's what will eventually cause these stereotypes. When you hear someone say "terrorist" what group do you think of? A lot of people would say middle eastern because the majority of terrorist attacks come from those of that race or religions associated with that area of the world.Originally posted by Wh33lhopComment
-
Alright let me clarify some stuff for you guys. I was just walking down that street last Friday night on a vacation with my wife to see her family. What everyone is missing is that France is completely different than America. They don't carry guns because THEY DON'T NEED TO. Compared to the US, the crime rate is astonishingly lower. It is illegal for anyone other than military or police officers to carry a gun. When you walk the streets you will see that there is practically zero crime. They are able to live more peacefully because IMO they are more socially advanced than us.Originally posted by matt king
I saw it first hand on new years that the majority of those burning cars and making a huge mess of everything were in fact middle eastern or of that ethnicity. There is a reason French HATE...and I mean HATE Islam and immigrating Muslims...I don't blame them. I had several guys trying to pick a fight with me all whom were middle eastern. The whole "open mindedness" is causing a complete cultural take-over in France. I hate to say it but the French culture that we know of today will mostly be gone within 40-50 years. Immigrants from Islam countries are destroying their culture by making them bend to theirs. They bitch and whine constantly without understanding that they came into someone else's country. THEY need to respect the French culture and religion...not the other way around. If your home country is so great and pure then why would you go to another and make others bend to you? For those who say "you can't stereotype or make a whole group accountable for a small number". Do you think just a small handful of immigrants caused so much hate towards them? Do you think that a small handful has nearly caused a cultural and political upheaval in France? Stereotypes don't come from the small amounts in a group. Stereotypes form from the image or actions done by the majority of its members or it is the group where those actions/images statistically will come from.
This definitely did not help the relations between the French and Muslim community at all.Originally posted by Wh33lhopComment
-
Hopefully these won't be hollow promises and claims...
CAIRO (AP) — Egypt's president opened the new year with a dramatic call for a "revolution" in Islam to reform interpretations of the faith entrenched for hundreds of years, which he said have made the Muslim world a source of "destruction" and pitted it against the rest of the world.
The speech was Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi's boldest effort yet to position himself as a modernizer of Islam. His professed goal is to purge the religion of extremist ideas of intolerance and violence that fuel groups like al-Qaida and the Islamic State — and that appear to have motivated Wednesday's attack in Paris on a French satirical newspaper that killed 12 people.
But those looking for the "Muslim Martin Luther" bringing a radical Reformation of Islam may be overreaching — and making a false comparison to begin with. El-Sissi is clearly seeking to impose change through the state, using government religious institutions like the 1,000-year-old al-Azhar, one of the most eminent centers of Sunni Muslim thought and teaching.
Al-Azhar's vision for change, however, is piecemeal, and conservative, focusing on messaging and outreach but wary of addressing deeper and more controversial issues.
Al-Azhar officials tout a YouTube channel just launched to reach out to the young, mimicking radicals' successful social media outreach to disenfranchised youth. They proudly point out that clerics in the videos wear suits, not al-Azhar's traditional robes and turbans, to be more accessible.
Young people "have a negative image toward this garb," said Mohie Eddin Affifi, an al-Azhar official. "As soon as they see it they don't listen."
View galleryFILE - In this Oct. 25, 2014, file photo provided by …
FILE - In this Oct. 25, 2014, file photo provided by Egypt's state news agency MENA, Egyptian Pr …
In a more ambitious effort, religious school textbooks are under review. Affifi said texts outlining rules for slavery, for instance, have been removed.
It's a problem across the Muslim world: State religious institutions are burdened by stagnation and heavy control by authorities.
For decades, al-Azhar has lost credibility in the eyes of many Muslim youth who see it as mouthpiece of the state rather than an honest interpreter of religion. More appealing to some young men and women searching for identity in a rapidly changing world are calls for a return to the roots of the faith, including from the extremists of al-Qaida and the Islamic State.
In his Jan. 1 speech at al-Azhar addressing Muslim clerics — held to mark the Prophet Muhammad's birthday — el-Sissi called on them to promote a reading of Islamic texts in a "truly enlightened" manner to reconsider concepts "that have been made sacred over hundreds of years."
By such thinking, the Islamic world is "making enemies of the whole world. So 1.6 billion people (in the Muslim world) will kill the entire world of 7 billion? That's impossible ... We need a religious revolution."
View galleryFILE - In this Aug. 11, 2014, file photo provided by …
FILE - In this Aug. 11, 2014, file photo provided by the Saudi Press Agency, Egyptian President Abde …
Radicals — and el-Sissi's Islamist political opponents who have wide religious followings — angrily denounced el-Sissi, saying he was trying to corrupt the religion. Even secularists, who would normally promote a more modern interpretation of Islam, frowned at el-Sissi's statist approach to such a complicated issue. "A state-approved revolution," questioned Amina Khairi, a columnist in the generally pro-state newspaper al-Watan.
And even state religious officials pushed back against the use of the word "revolution" or the idea of dramatic change.
Affifi, from al-Azhar, told the AP that el-Sissi didn't mean changing texts -- something even el-Sissi quickly made clear in his speech.
"What the president meant is that we need a contemporary reading for religious texts to deal with our contemporary reality," said Affifi, who is secretary general of the Islamic Research Center. The center is an Al-Azhar body responsible for studying Islamic issues and for providing preachers to explain religious affairs to the police, military, schools, government and private companies. It is also responsible for censorship.
He said al-Azhar has already been working for months on such a campaign, following calls for modernizing the faith that el-Sissi has been making since his May presidential election campaign. Committees have been examining textbooks used in the large network of grade schools and universities that al-Azhar runs across Egypt to remove things that have "no place in modern life." Texts on slavery and on refusing to greet Christians and Jews, for example, have been removed.
View galleryFILE - In this Jan. 6, 2015, file photo, Egypt's …
FILE - In this Jan. 6, 2015, file photo, Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, second right, …
Affifi said positions on issues like slavery, jihad and dealings with non-Muslims were adopted by scholars five centuries ago in a particular historical context. "These were opinions of scholars, these interpretations are not sacred."
There is also a push to encourage a nationalism that officials see as moderating religious sentiment. El-Sissi this week attended Christmas services for Egypt's Orthodox Coptic Christians and declared that Egyptians should not view each other as Christians or Muslims but as Egyptians.
The sheik of al-Azhar has launched a campaign in schools and universities promoting the message that "love of nation is part of faith," said Affifi. Al-Azhar also plans to introduce a new Islamic culture course in all of Egypt's universities, Affifi said.
For el-Sissi, the impetus for his modernization campaign is not only the violence wreaked by extremist groups around the Mideast and the world. It's also rooted in his political rivalry with the Muslim Brotherhood. El-Sissi, then head of the military, led the overthrow in July 2013 of an elected president from the Brotherhood, and since then Egypt has cracked down hard on Islamists, with hundreds killed in street clashes and thousands jailed.
To counter Islamists' claims of religiosity, el-Sissi has presented himself throughout his rise as a pious proponent of a moderate, mainstream Islam.
View galleryFILE - In this June 25, 2014, file photo, Egyptian …
FILE - In this June 25, 2014, file photo, Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi stands at Algiers …
At the same time, his government has shown little tolerance for dissent of any kind. That raises a key problem with the "religion revolution" — state control over religious reform could just stifle it. Al-Azhar has always claimed to be the bastion of "moderate" Islam, but it has moved to silence progressive and liberal re-interpretations just as often as radical ones.
"Any religious modernization will ultimately be against al-Azhar, since it is the conservative fortress in the system," said Amr Ezzat, religion researcher at the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights. The "authority of religion over modern life and law is what needs to be reviewed. What we need is freedom to have more than one religious discourse to enrich discussion, because as it is pluralism is outlawed."
State control of al-Azhar makes those most vulnerable to militancy least likely to listen.
If the sheik of al-Azhar speaks out against radicalism — as he often does — "no one who is remotely inclined to a violent interpretation will be impressed by that," said H.A. Hellyer, a fellow at the Centre for Middle East policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "They will say: You are just an ally of the state, instead of a genuinely independent figure."
Like Ezzat, he says only independent voices can present a counter-narrative to militant thought. But al-Sissi shows no sign of allowing that, Hellyer said.Originally posted by Wh33lhopComment
-
Yes, we have lots of guns in the US. Did that stop 9/11?
There are a lot of guns in Yemen, did that stop the bombing of the USS Cole?
There are lots of guns in Lebanon, did that stop the bombing of the Marine barracks?
There are lots of guns in Nigeria, did that stop hundreds of girls being abducted and forced in to sexual slavery?
It wouldn't have stopped this either.
All the fantasies in the world wouldn't have stopped it. You standing in the street with your 9mm wouldn't slow them down any more than the 2 armed police officers who were shot and killed.
Not sure if serious, or....
Not sure if serious, or....
Europe takes in far more immigrants, including Muslim ones, than the US or Canada. Here at least new immigrants tend to be assimilated more quickly/easily in to their new surroundings and become part of the country as a whole. It's not a complete assimilation (think of all the "Little China", "Little Havana", etc neighborhoods in cities across the country) but they don't tend to stay completely isolated either. In Europe many immigrants tend to stay isolated in communities made up primarily of other immigrants from the same country/region, and struggle to assimilate. It's a situation that nearly all European countries are currently dealings with, not just France. Even the Swedes, long known as one of the most socially "mature" and tolerant populations in Europe (or even the world) have had lots of problems with highly insular communities of immigrants that, for various reasons, will not or can not assimilate in to Swedish culture, and end up highly marginalized because of it. It's this marginalization, often caused by highly segregated neighborhoods that lack many of the same social services, job opportunities, educational entities, or cultural outlets, enjoyed by the broader population, that tend to lead towards radicalization of unemployed, bored young people who then look for someone to "blame" for their situation. Of course this kind of situation also breeds contempt, and in some cases racist feelings towards, these communities and groups by the "native" elements of the population who are frustrated by that lack of assimilation, which they see as an affront to their national culture and identity. Both sides now distrust and dislike each other, leading to conflict. It's not pretty, but it's a fact.
I don't know why there is a difference in immigrant's ability (or perhaps desire) to assimilate more quickly/readily in the US vs Europe, but the results of this failure to do so are becoming an issue. And so far no one in European politics that I'm aware of has proposed any effective solutions. People on the right want to limit or even end immigration, and people on the left want to just throw money/services at them and hope they'll change. Neither will work in the way that is needed :/Last edited by CorvallisBMW; 01-08-2015, 07:38 AM.Comment
-
Roosevelt said it best, this should apply to ALL countries, not just the U.S.:
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American ... There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag ... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
Theodore Roosevelt 1907
Those who immigrate to another country and force it to assimilate to them is committing an act of moral treason and should not be allowed to continue residence. Assimilate, or at least make an effort to. Don't force the country who welcomed you with open arms to do so. We've done enough by allowing you in...now do your part.Originally posted by Wh33lhopComment
-
I tend to agree with this. What's the point in leaving your home country, only to move to another country and expect them to bend over backwards to be just like your old country? They made the choice to move to a country, they shouldn't expect it to change to satisfy them. I'm not saying that we shouldn't make accommodations or that people should be forced to assimilate under some kind of harsh penalty, but the idea of using violence against your new home (which you entered under your own free will) because it's not enough like your old home, is reprehensible.Comment
-
Exactly, and people don't get that.
I moved from Southern California to Idaho. Do you think I was pompous enough to try and make this place California? Nope, I've accepted the differences and value the benefits over the downfalls.
I'm not gonna go postal because I can't get Pho at 3AM anymore and the sushi sucks asshole.Comment
-
1989 325is l 1984 euro 320i l 1970 2002 Racecar
1991 318i 4dr slick top
Euro spec 320i/Alpina B6 3.5 project(the never ending saga)
Vintage race car revival (2002 content)
Mtech 2 turbo restoration
Brilliantrot slick top "build"Comment
Comment