Hillary Sucks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wschnitz
    replied
    So Nando you still not believing any of this?





    I was skeptical too but lol wat

    Leave a comment:


  • Rsully70sev
    replied
    LOL he owned up to it when he got caught. You're a joke bud, you'll never recognize the wrong in your own candidate.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by TimeMachinE30
    Again failing to see. And against the law... a lot is.. like illegal immigration. It just isn't as illegal as others, right? Coming out of the 60s, I am sure there was plenty of power in the civil rights name to be wielded. Or how about the all white golf club Bill played at in the 90s? Decades beyond the 70s? Was racial discrimination just a 70s law that applied to DJT?
    You're all over the map and I have no idea what you're trying to convey. Are you saying there wasn't any merit to the cases? What does bill's golfing have to do with a violation of the FHA?

    At least he owned up to it being a bad decision in 1992 when he was called out on it by the NAACP.

    Has Trump owned up to these two cases?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Again failing to see. And against the law... a lot is.. like illegal immigration. It just isn't as illegal as others, right? Coming out of the 60s, I am sure there was plenty of power in the civil rights name to be wielded. Or how about the all white golf club Bill played at in the 90s? Decades beyond the 70s? Was racial discrimination just a 70s law that applied to DJT?

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by TimeMachinE30
    Well if you want to go that route, then.. well some of it has been said. The super predators..... keep AL Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They are model citizens of race equality?

    Settlements. It's a get away from me, it's not worth the time. Look into Freddy Gray. It's how he made a living. Many others do it.

    The times were different then. The food reference.. goes to show how ubiquitous it was. Get over it. If you cannot see that, understand it or appreciate it ... you are lost in the sauce. Did you know women (you like women's rights, right) are not treated well by Islam? Hillary loves her some Islam. You don't like women who are strong and powerful and inpendent? That is more up to speed of today. If you want to talk 1960 and 1970s... well see it through the lens of time.

    I'm sure we all could look back and reflect on something we did through the lens of now and then. They would not be viewed the same way. Keep context. It shows a terrible desire to fudge the facts when you dont.
    The entire context argument falls out the window when said discrimination was against the law. We're not talking about our grandparents who used colorful language long after it became taboo to use those phrases.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    You're trying to make a false equivalency here by comparing discriminatory rental policies based on race of applicants compared to a word with colloquial nickname of a food. piss poor, try again.

    Not only was Trump sued and settled once on this issue, they were taken to court again a few years later for doing the same thing.
    Well if you want to go that route, then.. well some of it has been said. The super predators..... keep AL Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They are model citizens of race equality?

    Settlements. It's a get away from me, it's not worth the time. Look into Freddy Gray. It's how he made a living. Many others do it.

    The times were different then. The food reference.. goes to show how ubiquitous it was. Get over it. If you cannot see that, understand it or appreciate it ... you are lost in the sauce. Did you know women (you like women's rights, right) are not treated well by Islam? Hillary loves her some Islam. You don't like women who are strong and powerful and inpendent? That is more up to speed of today. If you want to talk 1960 and 1970s... well see it through the lens of time.

    I'm sure we all could look back and reflect on something we did through the lens of now and then. They would not be viewed the same way. Keep context. It shows a terrible desire to fudge the facts when you dont.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rsully70sev
    replied
    Quit being so naive, the first part of that video was in real time along with many other versions. I just posted that for the sake of argument, I also posed other observations about her health you neglected to address Nando.

    At the end of the day do I think she's unfit to be president because of her health? No. I think she's unfit to be president because of her track record over the last 30 years.

    Brave, if you want to discuss racism and systematic racism how about we talk about her husband's 1994 crime bill that has incarcerated more black people than ever before. How about when she said super predators (black people) must be brought to heel. How about when she joked that Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in St. Louis? Or hey, how about when she made a joke about colored people time a few months ago? What about when Bill paid $20k to play at an all white golf course till he got caught? The list goes on...

    I don't know about you, but I'd rather stick to policy. Both of our candidates have done and said some stupid shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by TimeMachinE30
    70s. A sign of the times.

    Brazilian nuts... called what by many grandparents of ours? If you think he was the only, stand by.... or better yet.. look further.
    You're trying to make a false equivalency here by comparing discriminatory rental policies based on race of applicants compared to a word with colloquial nickname of a food. piss poor, try again.

    Not only was Trump sued and settled once on this issue, they were taken to court again a few years later for doing the same thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    I just met a 64 year old runner who would outperform a majority of the youth today.. unfortunately me too.

    Age isn't the topic. The health is.

    Also, Reagan had a track record folks could go for. Bringing him back for a second term.. was based on a previous term and time in CA.

    He also was diagnosed with dimentia.. in '94. He left office in '89. I don't expect anyone to never get sick. As we age, it tends to happen more frequently. His time in office seems to have been unaffected by coughing spells, concussions, hearing aids, use of support to stand and walk, emergency stand-by medications and others brought to light.

    It is not my mission to convince you nando. The Nile is more than a river in Egypt. I can only present your ideas with fact. How old was Reagan when he was diagnosed with alzheimers and was he in office at the time or running for office? Was information released that HRC suffered a concussion? Is it not well documented she uses and needs support for standing, walking and climbing stairs? Was she wearing frensel lens eyewear?
    Last edited by TimeMachinE30; 09-08-2016, 10:39 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    Reagan was older. So what? He had dementia, and he still did a pretty damn good job right?

    It's still 100% made up BS. That is why Trump is going to lose. There is lots of legitimate issues he could use to go after HRC - but they keep getting sidetracked with wackjob conspiracy theories.
    Lmao!

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Reagan was older. So what? He had dementia, and he still did a pretty damn good job right?

    It's still 100% made up BS. That is why Trump is going to lose. There is lots of legitimate issues he could use to go after HRC - but they keep getting sidetracked with wackjob conspiracy theories.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    Uhhh the entire Judge Curiel incident?

    Or how about trump and his father both being sued by the DoJ in the 70's for racial discrimination in their property rental practices?
    70s. A sign of the times.

    Brazilian nuts... called what by many grandparents of ours? If you think he was the only, stand by.... or better yet.. look further.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    hey, here's a youtube video made by some wackjob conspiracists - it MUST be true! :|
    You mean the YT video that ignited the events in Benghazi?

    Or which YT vid?

    edit: ah, the HRC neck jerking twerking vid.. yes.. edited for effect.. foolish to base a decision on it alone iin its unedited format... many other pieces documenting concern for her health though. Dr. Drew is in hot water for speaking out. Hope he doesn't get "robbed" like Seth Richards.
    Last edited by TimeMachinE30; 09-08-2016, 09:04 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Originally posted by Schnitzer318is
    It was the first site I saw that gave the whole context of the incident. I'm sure there are others as well. At least they bothered to cover the entire incident, not just a 5 second clip that they slowed down to varying degrees over and over again. Try not to be so naive. Anyone looks like a raving lunatic at 5fps.

    All media is biased (one of the reasons I cancelled cable long ago). I'll say it again. Hillary sucks... but making up health issues, or using health in general, as a party position against a candidate shows just how weak your candidate is. It's childish.

    That Bloomberg article is an interesting read, if a bit lengthy, but nothing surprising (or new). We live in a state of surveillance, and it will get worse under HRC. Who knows what Trump would do with those tools as vindictive and childish as he is.
    The video you speak of is goofy with its molestation, editing for effect. I agree. In real time it maintains some goofiness. I am sure it is a challenge to be interviewed so actively. That is not the only documentation of concerning behavior.

    And I consider myself not to be naive. It is partly why I challenged your use of snopes.

    Thank you for reading it. It is cool from my techy love but scary from a love of freedom... ya i am not robbing, stealing, raping so what do I have to fear.. Id just like a community that policed itself. Under HRC, it would get worse! We don't know about DJT. One can conjecture.. but..

    Health is only one issue being offered. Politics is a tough game. All who enter accept that. Health is also a serious issue to ponder and consider for many reasons (ability to travel, mental sharpness and critical thought, active in the role, concern if second in command could do the job, etc). The approach could backfire, where sympathy votes go to HRC.

    Read up on who supported that survelliance program single-handedly. Start to connect some dots. Always follow the money trail. It's what makes the world go 'round. I think its ironic how folks use DJT's legal donations to HRC. He knows the game and threw some cheese their way. Yet, what about the other flows of moneys and appointments.. like muslim brotherhood members/affiliates being appointed to the current administration (read up on the Holy Land Foundation and the FBIs case against them).


    And nando, I am sorry you did not get a chance to respond to my post. I was looking forward to your commentary.
    Last edited by TimeMachinE30; 09-08-2016, 09:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    hey, here's a youtube video made by some wackjob conspiracists - it MUST be true! :|

    Leave a comment:

Working...