Hillary Sucks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    Oh look, a "documentary" by the author of a widely discredited book (even on the conservative side). I didn't know you still read children's fiction - and now there will be pretty pictures!
    What on earth are you going on about?

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Oh look, a "documentary" by the author of a widely discredited book (even on the conservative side). I didn't know you still read children's fiction - and now there will be pretty pictures!

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    Gonna take that as a yes
    More drive by commentary Lolololol

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by djjerme
    http://elections.ap.org/content/ad-spending


    She's buying this election for sure! DAAAAAAAAMMNN!
    Not saying that either person is or is not buying the election, but the spend makes sense. Camp T will probably increase their spend dramatically (if they have the funding) in September, while camp C will spend for no apparent reason months in advance of the undecideds actually deciding.

    Campaign finance reform and advertising restrictions where are you? Oh, right, Congress.

    Leave a comment:


  • djjerme
    replied



    She's buying this election for sure! DAAAAAAAAMMNN!

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    Gonna take that as a yes

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    were you drunk when you made this post?
    you'll enjoy this one also

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    yes hillary does indeed suck, at being qualified to be president
    this is about Benghazi, nit about the killing per se, but about hillary and her ability to be responsive to federal law
    can she be pres and not have a security clearance?

    https://sharylattkisson.com/hillary-...tive-timeline/
    were you drunk when you made this post?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kershaw
    replied
    I'm not sure. I've been telling myself I'm a full grown adult for years now and I still don't believe it.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    If you lie to yourself enough times, do you believe it?

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    yes hillary does indeed suck, at being qualified to be president
    this is about Benghazi, nit about the killing per se, but about hillary and her ability to be responsive to federal law
    can she be pres and not have a security clearance?

    https://sharylattkisson.com/hillary-...tive-timeline/

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by TimeMachinE30
    I'll take rhetorical question for $1000.

    Try not to get so jumpy. I know it's politics and everyone has THE right idea. Just be comfortable knowing you know; trying to convince someone else how right you are does not work. Time will tell.
    Now I see it, guess I had my P&R hat on when I replied.

    I like what you're saying!

    Originally posted by M-technik-3
    Here's the question, how many votes will Mickey Mouse get this year? Willing to bet it's pretty decent number this year, thinking 4%
    No, no, Obama isn't eligible to be reelected. (He made that joke about his ears BTW.)

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    Here's the question, how many votes will Mickey Mouse get this year? Willing to bet it's pretty decent number this year, thinking 4%

    Leave a comment:


  • TimeMachinE30
    replied
    Originally posted by roguetoaster
    It's there in the middle column, and it's telling us that there is no definite trend at all if we use our high school statistics knowledge. Polls don't matter until everyone says you are 10 points down (leads to two things, poor turnout, and desertion to the presumptive winner), and even then it's correctable if there's more than two weeks to the general. Of course, none of this matters as I doubt we will see a winner and a concession after the deed is done. Likely this one's going to the men/women in black unless someone implodes.

    I'll take rhetorical question for $1000.

    Try not to get so jumpy. I know it's politics and everyone has THE right idea. Just be comfortable knowing you know; trying to convince someone else how right you are does not work. Time will tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by TimeMachinE30
    What is the margin for error?
    It's there in the middle column, and it's telling us that there is no definite trend at all if we use our high school statistics knowledge. Polls don't matter until everyone says you are 10 points down (leads to two things, poor turnout, and desertion to the presumptive winner), and even then it's correctable if there's more than two weeks to the general. Of course, none of this matters as I doubt we will see a winner and a concession after the deed is done. Likely this one's going to the men/women in black unless someone implodes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...