Let’s talk about Antifa.

[decay]

i think what you meant to say is you're not capable of debating someone who can present widespread evidence. but yeah, keep drinking that "fake news" kool-aid.

[MrBurgundy]

Okay, it's painfully obvious that he didn't mean that.

You're just choosing to believe a headline.

I give up, sorry.. I cannot have a conversation with someone who is turning their head to something so evident..

[decay]

Just based on the comment he said, it's just painfully obvious that he meant the Dems are willing to do that.

He even came out and said that's not what he meant and how the media is just being the media..

Come on, man. You have to be able to see past that twist lol.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...-constitution/

so what you're saying, and what the article you linked says, is he made another idiotic comment that's been well-documented and walked it back due to public response.

gee whiz, never seen that happen before.

his intent is clear, and the fact that the GOP has been largely silent about it is shameful.

[MrBurgundy]

uh no, that's exactly what he said. since you don't like cnn, even fox news is reporting the same.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whi...-files-release



if trump really thinks that's true, why is he bloviating about it on the internet rather than, yanno, getting a fucking lawyer?

Just based on the comment he said, it's just painfully obvious that he meant the Dems are willing to do that.

He even came out and said that's not what he meant and how the media is just being the media..

Come on, man. You have to be able to see past that twist lol.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...-constitution/

[decay]

I don't think anyone should invalidate or pervert the founding documents.

Trump was not saying he is willing to invalidate the documents in that tweet. He's saying the Dems who "stole" the election are capable and willing to do so if they're willing to "fraud" an election.

uh no, that's exactly what he said. since you don't like cnn, even fox news is reporting the same.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whi...-files-release

Trump argued the files showed evidence of "fraud and deception" in the 2020 election and went on to argue parts of the Constitution should be terminated to address it.

if trump really thinks that's true, why is he bloviating about it on the internet rather than, yanno, getting a fucking lawyer?

[MrBurgundy]

I don't think anyone should invalidate or pervert the founding documents.

Trump was not saying he is willing to invalidate the documents in that tweet. He's saying the Dems who "stole" the election are capable and willing to do so if they're willing to "fraud" an election.

[decay]

You should read my comment again

i read the whole thing. you should answer my questions. you have a habit of not doing that.

[MrBurgundy]

are you saying he's not wrong in that we should invalidate our country's founding document?

what happens to our 2nd-amendment rights with the Dems in control? if that doesn't matter to you, i must spend more time at the range than you do.

you're also sounding a bit ad-hominem here but that's a secondary point.

You should read my comment again

[decay]

but you know what? He's not wrong..

are you saying he's not wrong in that we should invalidate our country's founding document?

what happens to our 2nd-amendment rights with the Dems in control? if that doesn't matter to you, i must spend more time at the range than you do.

you're also sounding a bit ad-hominem here but that's a secondary point.

[MrBurgundy]

That tweet is being interpreted in biased way IMO

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social and accused “Big Tech” of working closely with Democrats. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

It seems like he's saying those who "wrongfully" took the election are capable of "terminating the rules."

This is just CNN and other media outlets doing what they did while he was president again lol.. Seems pretty obvious to me the more I read it..

People will continue to fall for it.. It's old at this point. Media is trash, people will discount that statement, because Trump has said it many times, but you know what? He's not wrong..

[decay]

stirring the pot here again.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

this is how fascism started in germany, with the beer-hall putches creating a movement, and drumpf is trying it again by attempting to erase the constitution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch does that smell a little bit like January 6?

i don't give a fuck about how you vote, that's an individual choice and i'm an anarchist (by practice, not by policy, meaning i live how i choose and don't act or vote in a way that might impact or assert authority on anyone else).

of course the sitting Dems are losing their shit, as we'd expect, but even Dick Cheney's daughter in the GOP is calling it out.

all of us should be objecting.

[decay]

checking in a year later and still waiting for a reasoned argument from the r3v alt-right.

it's okay though, i'm having a great time watching the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys turn snitch on each other about Jan 6.

meanwhile, Drumpf just invited a holocaust denier to mar-a-lago and you idiots would probably still vote for him again.

https://www.axios.com/2022/11/25/tru...entes-ye-kanye

(the less said about "ye" the antisemist the better, but if you actually like his music you really need to explore spotify a little more.)

[E30 Wagen]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry5URU-Py2Q

[decay]

you can keep larping, to say defunding the police is a legitimate stance is ignorant. Check out those cities that have done so and where they are now. It's not hard to do some research. You're right, I'm a spring chicken; just born yesterday.

if you have those statistics at hand, why not have provided them in the first place?

i'm pleased that you fell back on the lazy-ass "do your own research" trope because i've already done it for the city i live in:

https://stories.opengov.com/oaklandca/published/lTrMIWK3R

no. nearly 20% of the revenue my city takes in should not be going to cops and their equipment. especially when they use MRAPs ("do some research", i know what they are because i rode in them in iraq and there is not a use case for city police to have those vehicles) to evict homeless mothers from unoccupied housing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...-moms-evicted/

also, i don't think you can call it "larping" when i've been hit by cops and have a riot shield that shows beanbag round scars on it. the fucking pigs didn't seem like they were playing a game.

if you want to continue, try a little harder at supporting your arguments, *junior*.

[TeXJ]

well then feel free to recuse yourself from the discussion, since you don't have anything useful to add. you probably weren't even alive for some of the events i mention.

you can keep larping, to say defunding the police is a legitimate stance is ignorant. Check out those cities that have done so and where they are now. It's not hard to do some research. You're right, I'm a spring chicken; just born yesterday.