Should a high School incident be relevant 35 years later?

[Elysian]

I don't disagree he has been less than truthful before and I feel the way he turned the blackout question around was unacceptable.

At best I feel he is telling his truth as he blacked out and does not remember. I have never been a heavy drinker but had friends that were and they adamantly denied doing things I watched them do (no attacks).

He can be telling the truth as he knows it and have done this. I doubt we'll ever know.

Problem is he's lied about all manner of things, from stolen Dem emails to the meaning of well known words and phrases. He's crafted this alternate reality, and frankly isn't a believable person. He doesn't belong on the SCOTUS for that, without even touching these allegations.

[parkerbink]

Frankly have no reason to believe Kavanaugh. He has lied under oath about many things to this point.

I don't disagree he has been less than truthful before and I feel the way he turned the blackout question around was unacceptable.

At best I feel he is telling his truth as he blacked out and does not remember. I have never been a heavy drinker but had friends that were and they adamantly denied doing things I watched them do (no attacks).

He can be telling the truth as he knows it and have done this. I doubt we'll ever know.

[Elysian]

Frankly have no reason to believe Kavanaugh. He has lied under oath about many things to this point.

[parkerbink]

She said Brett, Judge & P.J. were at the party. He said he never drank on weekdays. This is a Thursday and he names all three.

hmmmmmm

[parkerbink]

I get your point, what I'm saying is that she thought that she could just make the claim against him and walk away like any other women have.done.

No, she knew her life would be thrown into the shitstorm it has been and asked for anonymity.

The letter was leaked and she came forward.

Who are these any other women?

[Mediumrarechicken]

Sure but what if they can't? Are you ok with a lifetime appointment for a guy that clearly has several issues?

I'm not talking about the sexual allegations. I'm talking about the fact he clearly had a serious drinking problem and is lying about it.

I'm talking about saying he has no issues with Roe but clearly does, etc.




The point isn't that he should be prosecuted, it is that he may have committed this crime and SCOTUS isn't a right.



She never said she didn't fly, she said she dislikes it.

Do you do things you dislike when there is a reward at the end? Do you avoid them when there is not????

How is it you can be outraged over at best a miscommunication but claim Trump's dozens of video viewable lies a week are ok?

You can't have it both ways. Either you are opposed to lying or you are not.

I get your point, what I'm saying is that she thought that she could just make the claim against him and walk away like any other women have.done.

[parkerbink]

If the FBI can prove that BK didn't commit the alleged assault, are you OK with with them bringing Federal charges for lying under oath and sending her to jail?

Sure but what if they can't? Are you ok with a lifetime appointment for a guy that clearly has several issues?

I'm not talking about the sexual allegations. I'm talking about the fact he clearly had a serious drinking problem and is lying about it.

I'm talking about saying he has no issues with Roe but clearly does, etc.

Aannnnnnnnnnnnnnd, I don't see the point of dragging this out more.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...gh/1453587002/

The point isn't that he should be prosecuted, it is that he may have committed this crime and SCOTUS isn't a right.

I found it funny when a female was questioning her about wanting them to come to her because she is scares to fly, then the woman busted her ass on going to Fiji and Hawaii. The reply was, it's easier to go that way( she jesters with her arm) and says how its different because its vacation. Noooo she thought everyone was just going to accept what she said as the truth and that's it.

She never said she didn't fly, she said she dislikes it.

Do you do things you dislike when there is a reward at the end? Do you avoid them when there is not????

How is it you can be outraged over at best a miscommunication but claim Trump's dozens of video viewable lies a week are ok?

You can't have it both ways. Either you are opposed to lying or you are not.

[Mediumrarechicken]

I found it funny when a female was questioning her about wanting them to come to her because she is scares to fly, then the woman busted her ass on going to Fiji and Hawaii. The reply was, it's easier to go that way( she jesters with her arm) and says how its different because its vacation. Noooo she thought everyone was just going to accept what she said as the truth and that's it.

[naplesE30]

Actually she said she would not even apply for a search warrant based on testimony. USA Today omitted that little detail.

[z31maniac]

Aannnnnnnnnnnnnnd, I don't see the point of dragging this out more.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/09/28/rachel-mitchell-says-she-wouldnt-prosecute-scots-nominee-kavanaugh/1453587002/

[saucers]

If the FBI can prove that BK didn't commit the alleged assault, are you OK with with them bringing Federal charges for lying under oath and sending her to jail?

if she knowingly lied, abso-fucking-lutely

[z31maniac]

I don't see how anyone can be against a one week delay to investigate this more.
There is literally no down side.
He's going to be a Supreme Court Justice for the rest of his life.

If the FBI can prove that BK didn't commit the alleged assault, are you OK with with them bringing Federal charges for lying under oath and sending her to jail?

[Schnitzer318is]

They didn’t even go to the same school.

He went to an all boys school and she didn’t attend any of the sister schools.

Yeah, sorry brain-farted there for a sec...

[naplesE30]

In this era of wrecking a mans carear over allegations, (generally speaking, and not just this particular case) I think it’s appropriate to bring back duels.

[saucers]

I don't see how anyone can be against a one week delay to investigate this more.
There is literally no down side.
He's going to be a Supreme Court Justice for the rest of his life.