Leche

[daniel]

I used to have the 50 1.4, its a great lens, maybe better then the 85. Either way the 85 is alot less useful then the 50. For me the 85 is pretty much a portrait only lens. So unless portraiture is your thing, stick with the 50 (i wish i could have both)

A 70-200 is a great lens. Really expensive though, unless your shooting sports or something else where you dont have time to change lenses or your shooting lots of candids its kinda not worth it. I have a tokina 50-135 2.8 to KINDA do the 70-200's job but for cheaper becuase most of my shots are setup and im not in a hurry to change focal lengths. Plus primes put zoom lenses to shame in terms of speed/distortions,light weight,and sharpness.

wanna trade your 85 1.8D for my 50 1.4D +$50? seriously. PM me if you wanna. i love the 50, but i actually am doing a lot of portraits and have been looking for an 85.

[daniel]

it's not a bad picture, don't get me wrong. I just think a different DOF would've made the picture more apealing in my mind. There's a sweet spot and I think a wider apeture could've achieved that. Just my opinion..

your opinion is wrong, lol

[Dude]

lol

Ill PM you later, i gotta run right now.

[freeride53]

nickpro.

[NuthinFancy]

Thats just one of the sickest volvos ive seen in a while. And the pics came out great.

[240zs30]

Nice car.

[Kershaw]

What are shutter speeds for?
Why would he want to change the DOF? Would that have made it more in focus?

lolol, dont start trolling if you have to ask questions to further your argument.

in any regard, he would have wanted to use a smaller aperture if he wanted more of the image in focus.

[Dude]

nickpro.

pro is actual last name haha

[lolcantturn]

lolol, dont start trolling if you have to ask questions to further your argument.

Yes because I can't answer those questions, sorry guy. I asked them without knowing the answer.

[kermugit]

Fukin sweet. Nice ride love the wheels; should put the rack back on.

[Mike The Bavarian]

lolol, dont start trolling if you have to ask questions to further your argument.

in any regard, he would have wanted to use a smaller aperture if he wanted more of the image in focus.

that's true to a certain extent. that would make everything sharper and such. But I think along with him focusing that picture better a wider aperture would've allowed for more light and a better feel of the car.
either way all the other pictures came out awesome.

[Ryann]

I've owned a lotta bricks, 242GT's, 242T's, 245T's.. none of which looked that nice, regardless of camera nerd bullshit.

Props.

[SwedishDeserter]

nickpro.

pro is actual last name haha

nickpro is his name on turbobricks.

[Dude]

nickpro is his name on turbobricks.

I know, and its also his name in real life!

[AE_m20]

Boner achieved