M20 - dry-sumped, ITB's .... in a Commodore?!
Collapse
X
-
-
I kind of disagree. I would much prefer to change a belt and do a little other maintenance every few years compared to having to screw with chains, sprockets, rails, guides and oil seals once. So IMO, they're better in every way.--WillComment
-
love those medusa headers!!! wish my m10 could hace shitl ike that!1989 325i SETA stroker [delphin] R3V'd 8/31/2011
1989 325ix [zinnoberrot] $OLD
1970 2002 [Nevada]
Originally posted by Herr Faust Schinkenguy must have slid into something that doesn't look like a car vs car hitOriginally posted by ak-Must of slid into RobComment
-
^
Agreed
lighter weight stands out to me
It's so easy to change anyway
Seeing that makes me miss my old m20, those are great engines, just not really the fad right now
they sound awesome, sewing machine noise an allWe're out there in here.
Comment
-
A worn out chain/timing set from some junkyard motor does not count as OK to me... a brand new timing belt and tensioner and a M20 is 100%; cost of a brand new chain/sproket/timing set is more $$$ and heavier rotational mass
Belts go 8,000-9,000 rpm+ all the time in subarus, hondas, mazda's. If one cannot afford a belt change in a M20 and wants to beat on the car - they cannot afford the car.
chains dont as much in OEM applications - my S54 could go 8400rpm daily but its overall cost could buy a s2k motor+subaru sti engine.
if you really care, no chain or belt;Direct gear drive.
Local M12 engine got converted to gear drive for efficiencyOBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25
Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30
Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine
Comment
-
cost of changing my e46's waterpump costs as much as the whole timing belt job on an e30 anyway (which requires you to tackle the water-pump). their rate of failure is the same at 60k.. if not sooner since they are composite construction. Biggest difference is when the other timing components on an m54 fails, then it becomes diminishing returns.Comment
-
There is nothing wrong with a timing belt. It is actually a more efficient design than a timing chain. Timing chains are for the masses who wouldn't even change their oil if it weren't for Jiffy Lube.No E30 ClubOriginally posted by MrBurgundyAnyways, mustangs are gay and mini vans are faster than your car, you just have to deal with that.Comment
-
FREE BITCOINS!! http://qoinpro.com/71690d1639966bfbf223bf16538cec21
Originally posted by scabzzzzI stand up, pull my dick out, and asked my gf to give me some noggin... Well, she starts laughing at me and I freaked out and ran off and locked myself in a bedroom.
2002 325i - DD
2005 Suzuki SV650 - ToyComment
-
look at that m20! but i do know it shouldn't be at that angle, correct?
Patrick - IG:niicknac
RIP 1987 BMW 325is - S50'd ZF 6-speed, flared, baggedComment
-
I just hate that feeling in the back of my head that A) the belt breaking will grenade the engine, B) on my way to buy the belt it will grenade, C) I fuck something up dicking around changing the belt, D) I'm not going to find time to change the belt and it will grenade the engine.ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็Originally posted by blunttechI need you to exfoliate my ballsack
Comment
-
Comment
-
They all have advantages and disadvantages.
Dosn't matter though because will all be drving something like this in the future.
Camless EnginesigpicComment
-
It would if your trying to keep the oil at the traditional oil-pump pickup spot (plus the oil-return tube off the manifold), but since you're dry sumping it wouldn't matter so much. Can't think of any other potential hickups at the moment.Comment
-
Comment
Comment