Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NOR-CAL General Chat.

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by kronus View Post
    but my jet's all hot and bothered and ready to go :(
    Try. If you can't cool them down you may make a premature purchasing decision and that doesn't leave anyone satisfied
    paint sucks

    Comment


      Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
      Where are numbers to back that up... As i recall the 95 m rack actually has less travel as well
      It had plenty of travel, I haven't noticed a difference in turning radius or available steering angle at lock. It might be a few mm less but any difference between it and Z3 non-M is splitting hairs.

      E30: 36.5mm/rev

      E30 M3: 38mm/rev

      E36 M3 (95): 41mm/rev on center, after first half-turn from center (180 degrees), 51mm/rev, progressive ratio

      E36 non-M/ M3 96+/MZ3: 45.5mm/rev constant ratio

      Z3 non-M: 53.5mm/rev constant ratio
      2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
      95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
      98 M3/4/5 (stock)

      Comment


        Originally posted by oliver.r View Post
        who is familiar with the s14?
        the shitty Nissan?




























        jk
        Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

        Follow my IG @bavarianstance

        Comment


          Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View Post
          It had plenty of travel, I haven't noticed a difference in turning radius or available steering angle at lock. It might be a few mm less but any difference between it and Z3 non-M is splitting hairs.

          E30: 36.5mm/rev

          E30 M3: 38mm/rev

          E36 M3 (95): 41mm/rev on center, after first half-turn from center (180 degrees), 51mm/rev, progressive ratio

          E36 non-M/ M3 96+/MZ3: 45.5mm/rev constant ratio

          Z3 non-M: 53.5mm/rev constant ratio
          Hmm. Sauce? IIRC the plebian e36 is progressive as well, and the 95M rack had about 20mm less LTL travel than the others
          paint sucks

          Comment


            Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
            Hmm. Sauce? IIRC the plebian e36 is progressive as well, and the 95M rack had about 20mm less LTL travel than the others
            Nope. 95 is 140mm travel, E36 is 146mm travel. Sauce is autox guys measuring them. Plebian E36 is not progressive, but it does not have limiting plates installed like the 96+ M3 rack does have, hence difference in L2L-ness. 6mm of travel difference isn't noticeable.

            Source: see posts 24 and 25, first-hand measurements.

            Bimmerforums is the preferred online BMW Forum and community for BMW owners. At Bimmerforums, you will find technical how-to information maintenance specifics audio advice wheel and tire combinations and model specific details not found anywhere else. Our professionals are here to help make sure you find the answers you need to your questions and our community is here to help other brainstorm ideas for the future.
            2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
            95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
            98 M3/4/5 (stock)

            Comment


              what's wrong with s14
              "I wanna see da boat movie"
              "I got a tree on my house"

              Comment


                Originally posted by Thizzelle View Post
                what's wrong with s14
                It's a stupid 4 cylinder waah

                /eric

                ;D
                paint sucks

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
                  It's a stupid 4 cylinder waah

                  /eric

                  ;D
                  [ERIC] Torque LOL........I has a sad[/ERIC]
                  2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                  95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                  98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                  Comment


                    To be fair, having driven it that thing would be super annoying to daily... Was very fun to wring out though.. while eric had a heart attack :rofl:
                    paint sucks

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
                      To be fair, having driven it that thing would be super annoying to daily... Was very fun to wring out though.. while eric had a heart attack :rofl:
                      Hehe. I enjoyed driving it when I did but I agree the lack of torque and peaky engine is a great hoon car and terrible street car.
                      2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                      95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                      98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                      Comment


                        yeah daily a M3 would be kinda poop, but mines tuned right and chipped.
                        "I wanna see da boat movie"
                        "I got a tree on my house"

                        Comment


                          im having a hell of a time trying to figure out my idle problem, I just want to hand it over to someone else and have them figure it out

                          Comment


                            what does it do? Mine rumbles up and down when I have a cold engine like a old muscle car/race car.
                            "I wanna see da boat movie"
                            "I got a tree on my house"

                            Comment


                              I have absolutely no issues daily driving my M3. I've driven other cars with smaller and bigger engines and there is nothing wrong with the M3. Yes it scoots above 4K rpm, but around town, who cares? Its got plenty of power to leave a stoplight in traffic, it does exactly what it needs to do with no fuss. I seriously don't get the whole "M3s suck as daily drivers". How does a person figure that a Honda Civic, or Toyota Corolla, Prius, or any other econobox is a better daily driver? They are all boring as hell to look at, drive or even ride in, yet the sell tens of thousands of them. An M3 has more power, is more comfortable, handles better, stops better, and well, does everything better. Heck, around town it gets 20 mpg, on the freeway its 29-30.

                              Seriously there is no reason to be above 4K rpm around town. None, unless you are on a freeway on ramp and then its a redline shift point (unless there is someone in your way or you have already exceeded the speed of traffic) Any manual transmission car will suck in stop and go traffic, there is no escaping that fact.

                              Who cares if the thing doesn't have 90% of its torque at 2K rpm. What fun would that be anywhere? Thanks I'll keep my peak torque north of 4500 rpm where it counts and is useful.

                              Will
                              '59 Alfa Romeo 101.02 Giulietta Sprint
                              '69 Alfa Romeo 105.51 1750 GTV (R.I.P)
                              '69 Datsun 2000 roadster Vintage race car
                              '88 BMW M3

                              Comment


                                I'm talking as a race suspension point of view, although I have only a 5min drive to work. And also your're working your car everyday which means more maintenance and more money then if you had one of those piles of shit you mentioned above or a regular e30 3series. Others that say it sucks I have no idea, I would daily mine but the price of it keeps going up everyday that goes buy :)
                                "I wanna see da boat movie"
                                "I got a tree on my house"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X