Originally posted by kronus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NOR-CAL General Chat.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Wh33lhop View PostWhere are numbers to back that up... As i recall the 95 m rack actually has less travel as well
E30: 36.5mm/rev
E30 M3: 38mm/rev
E36 M3 (95): 41mm/rev on center, after first half-turn from center (180 degrees), 51mm/rev, progressive ratio
E36 non-M/ M3 96+/MZ3: 45.5mm/rev constant ratio
Z3 non-M: 53.5mm/rev constant ratio
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View PostIt had plenty of travel, I haven't noticed a difference in turning radius or available steering angle at lock. It might be a few mm less but any difference between it and Z3 non-M is splitting hairs.
E30: 36.5mm/rev
E30 M3: 38mm/rev
E36 M3 (95): 41mm/rev on center, after first half-turn from center (180 degrees), 51mm/rev, progressive ratio
E36 non-M/ M3 96+/MZ3: 45.5mm/rev constant ratio
Z3 non-M: 53.5mm/rev constant ratiopaint sucks
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wh33lhop View PostHmm. Sauce? IIRC the plebian e36 is progressive as well, and the 95M rack had about 20mm less LTL travel than the others
Source: see posts 24 and 25, first-hand measurements.
Bimmerforums is the preferred online BMW Forum and community for BMW owners. At Bimmerforums, you will find technical how-to information maintenance specifics audio advice wheel and tire combinations and model specific details not found anywhere else. Our professionals are here to help make sure you find the answers you need to your questions and our community is here to help other brainstorm ideas for the future.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wh33lhop View PostIt's a stupid 4 cylinder waah
/eric
;D
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wh33lhop View PostTo be fair, having driven it that thing would be super annoying to daily... Was very fun to wring out though.. while eric had a heart attack :rofl:
Comment
-
I have absolutely no issues daily driving my M3. I've driven other cars with smaller and bigger engines and there is nothing wrong with the M3. Yes it scoots above 4K rpm, but around town, who cares? Its got plenty of power to leave a stoplight in traffic, it does exactly what it needs to do with no fuss. I seriously don't get the whole "M3s suck as daily drivers". How does a person figure that a Honda Civic, or Toyota Corolla, Prius, or any other econobox is a better daily driver? They are all boring as hell to look at, drive or even ride in, yet the sell tens of thousands of them.An M3 has more power, is more comfortable, handles better, stops better, and well, does everything better. Heck, around town it gets 20 mpg, on the freeway its 29-30.
Seriously there is no reason to be above 4K rpm around town. None, unless you are on a freeway on ramp and then its a redline shift point (unless there is someone in your way or you have already exceeded the speed of traffic) Any manual transmission car will suck in stop and go traffic, there is no escaping that fact.
Who cares if the thing doesn't have 90% of its torque at 2K rpm. What fun would that be anywhere? Thanks I'll keep my peak torque north of 4500 rpm where it counts and is useful.
Will'59 Alfa Romeo 101.02 Giulietta Sprint
'69 Alfa Romeo 105.51 1750 GTV (R.I.P)
'69 Datsun 2000 roadster Vintage race car
'88 BMW M3
Comment
-
I'm talking as a race suspension point of view, although I have only a 5min drive to work. And also your're working your car everyday which means more maintenance and more money then if you had one of those piles of shit you mentioned above or a regular e30 3series. Others that say it sucks I have no idea, I would daily mine but the price of it keeps going up everyday that goes buy :)"I wanna see da boat movie"
"I got a tree on my house"
Comment
Comment