If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Not quite, actually. Due to the caster and camber the front springs don't sit perfectly vertical, so the motion ratio of the front is around .9
Therefore wheel rate at the front with 550# is more like .9^2 * 550 thereabouts 450#/in
i think you are a bit off, since caster should be 10 degrees and camber is ~2 degrees. giving your that (1-.12)=.88. but then you need to add in that that is toward the direction if travel. making it's effectiveness slightly higher
but then you need to add in that that is toward the direction if travel
It is actually pretty complex if you want to accurately model it, but the gist is that the caster and kingpin angle inclination (the wheel is at a different camber angle than the spring/shock) mean the wheel has a slight mechanical advantage on the spring/shock. It changes a bit due to ride height and wheel offset as well.
Jack the car up, measure wheelhub->ground height and spring perch->strut top height, lift wheel two inches from ground, remeasure spring perch to strut top hight, divide the two, bam motion ratio. It isnt 1:1, but it is a lot closer in front than rear.
2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
98 M3/4/5 (stock)
Comment