Swap 1/4 Mile Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wh33lhop
    R3V OG
    • Feb 2009
    • 11705

    #286
    Originally posted by nando
    they usually have it within 5 feet around here. it makes a pretty big difference for me to do a hard launch vs a normal take off.
    Well, if everyone had a 2.8 stroker ix they could sidestep at 6 grand and take off like a bat out of hell it probably would :p

    Originally posted by JGood
    Mine is a few pages back. 14.4@94

    Justin_l (sp?) ran a 13.9 I think.
    Damn, that's pretty quick. Justin's was sort of a freak of nature though.

    You're running a stock M50TU on r-comps? No chip or anything?

    Seems like a lot of DOHC guys have a straight-up cone filter (hot air intake), I'm not sure how much hotter IATs are with that but I doubt it helps much. Justin's heat shield and probably the fact that he's running a really tall first gear (equivalent to a G260 and a 2.93 or 3.25 he said, didn't he?) and didn't have too many traction problems is probably partially to blame, but a 13.9 is a lot quicker than I'd expect to be, even with some WR and a chip.
    Last edited by Wh33lhop; 09-07-2009, 09:43 PM.
    paint sucks

    Comment

    • JGood
      R3V OG
      • Jan 2004
      • 7959

      #287
      Originally posted by Wh33lhop
      Well, if everyone had a 2.8 stroker ix they could sidestep at 6 grand and take off like a bat out of hell it probably would :p



      Damn, that's pretty quick. Justin's was sort of a freak of nature though.

      You're running a stock M50TU on r-comps? No chip or anything?

      Seems like a lot of DOHC guys have a straight-up cone filter (hot air intake), I'm not sure how much hotter IATs are with that but I doubt it helps much. Justin's heat shield and probably the fact that he's running a really tall first gear (equivalent to a G260 and a 2.93 or 3.25 he said, didn't he?) and didn't have too many traction problems is probably partially to blame, but a 13.9 is a lot quicker than I'd expect to be, even with some WR and a chip.

      I do have a Dinan chip, headers, and 2.5" exhaust, my intake is cone filter with a heat shield.

      Keep in mind my r-comps didn't do much. I did run a 14.487, but my average run was a 14.6 @ 93.5-94.5 and I tried it with street tires for my last run of the night. I wheel hopped through first, missed second gear, missed second gear again, then finally got it into gear and took off. The time was a 14.9@95...
      85 325e m60b44 6 speed / 89 535i
      e30 restoration and V8 swap
      24 Hours of Lemons e30 build

      Comment

      • nando
        Moderator
        • Nov 2003
        • 34827

        #288
        Originally posted by Wh33lhop
        Seems like a lot of DOHC guys have a straight-up cone filter (hot air intake), I'm not sure how much hotter IATs are with that but I doubt it helps much. Justin's heat shield and probably the fact that he's running a really tall first gear (equivalent to a G260 and a 2.93 or 3.25 he said, didn't he?) and didn't have too many traction problems is probably partially to blame, but a 13.9 is a lot quicker than I'd expect to be, even with some WR and a chip.
        I noticed this at the E30 picnic. tons of hot air intakes, most of them extremely dirty, and many of them are really small (low surface area + dirt + hot air = shit). my own measurements have shown that no shield can double your intake temps quite easily, and that's a good 5-10hp loss right there.
        Build thread

        Bimmerlabs

        Comment

        • Wh33lhop
          R3V OG
          • Feb 2009
          • 11705

          #289
          Originally posted by JGood
          I do have a Dinan chip, headers, and 2.5" exhaust, my intake is cone filter with a heat shield.

          Keep in mind my r-comps didn't do much. I did run a 14.487, but my average run was a 14.6 @ 93.5-94.5 and I tried it with street tires for my last run of the night. I wheel hopped through first, missed second gear, missed second gear again, then finally got it into gear and took off. The time was a 14.9@95...
          Yeah, well the reall stiff sidewall of r-comp and street-autox type tires (leading to less longitudinal contact patch) doesn't really do much for straight line traction, but the soft compound and small void area do help a bit.

          Interestingly enough, most of what I've seen points to beater cars with crappy tires and stock, small (but light) wheels getting the best quarter mile times. Crappy tires tend to have crappy sidewalls leading to more of a contact patch, but also to less rotational inertia (no sidewall reinforcement), and most people who get aftermarket wheels, even if they are as light as stock are pushing the mass further from the axis of rotation creating more of a moment of inertia regardless.

          I think, for the most part, unless you're on drag radials or slicks, tire choice doesn't matter that much for quarter mile times.
          paint sucks

          Comment

          • Wh33lhop
            R3V OG
            • Feb 2009
            • 11705

            #290
            Originally posted by nando
            I noticed this at the E30 picnic. tons of hot air intakes, most of them extremely dirty, and many of them are really small (low surface area + dirt + hot air = shit). my own measurements have shown that no shield can double your intake temps quite easily, and that's a good 5-10hp loss right there.
            Yeah, I think the idea is that by the time you're done with swapping the motor, the brake booster, doing the wiring, etc, they're not going to bother fabbing up an intake if they don't have to.

            I'm just going to slap a CARB-legal filter on it until I can fab up a routed intake and heat shield.
            paint sucks

            Comment

            • JGood
              R3V OG
              • Jan 2004
              • 7959

              #291
              Originally posted by Wh33lhop
              Yeah, well the reall stiff sidewall of r-comp and street-autox type tires (leading to less longitudinal contact patch) doesn't really do much for straight line traction, but the soft compound and small void area do help a bit.

              Interestingly enough, most of what I've seen points to beater cars with crappy tires and stock, small (but light) wheels getting the best quarter mile times. Crappy tires tend to have crappy sidewalls leading to more of a contact patch, but also to less rotational inertia (no sidewall reinforcement), and most people who get aftermarket wheels, even if they are as light as stock are pushing the mass further from the axis of rotation creating more of a moment of inertia regardless.

              I think, for the most part, unless you're on drag radials or slicks, tire choice doesn't matter that much for quarter mile times.


              I was basically sidestepping the clutch at 3k or higher, heard a loud bang as the driveshaft snapped all it's slack up, and the car went. No wheelspin. I honestly thought I was going to break something. I was using v710's that I did a nice burnout with... 205/55/14's.

              I understand what you are saying about sidewall flex, but we are dealing with 200hp cars, I think the effect is minimal in comparison to tread compound.
              85 325e m60b44 6 speed / 89 535i
              e30 restoration and V8 swap
              24 Hours of Lemons e30 build

              Comment

              • nando
                Moderator
                • Nov 2003
                • 34827

                #292
                Originally posted by Wh33lhop
                Yeah, I think the idea is that by the time you're done with swapping the motor, the brake booster, doing the wiring, etc, they're not going to bother fabbing up an intake if they don't have to.

                I'm just going to slap a CARB-legal filter on it until I can fab up a routed intake and heat shield.
                about 90% of the swaps I saw had open filters that looked like they'd been through a war. lazyness is a reason but I think ignorance plays a larger part.
                Build thread

                Bimmerlabs

                Comment

                • Wh33lhop
                  R3V OG
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 11705

                  #293
                  Originally posted by JGood
                  I was basically sidestepping the clutch at 3k or higher, heard a loud bang as the driveshaft snapped all it's slack up, and the car went. No wheelspin. I honestly thought I was going to break something. I was using v710's that I did a nice burnout with... 205/55/14's.

                  I understand what you are saying about sidewall flex, but we are dealing with 200hp cars, I think the effect is minimal in comparison to tread compound.
                  Fair point. I think it has more to do with rotational mass, but still.

                  Originally posted by nando
                  about 90% of the swaps I saw had open filters that looked like they'd been through a war. lazyness is a reason but I think ignorance plays a larger part.
                  It bugged me too, but I will be happy just to complete the swap and have the car fire up.
                  paint sucks

                  Comment

                  • JGood
                    R3V OG
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 7959

                    #294
                    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
                    Fair point. I think it has more to do with rotational mass, but still.
                    Yeah, that too. Weird thing is, I ran a full 1 mph faster then any other run, on my last run of the night, with my slowest ET, when using my heavy 16's and 205/45/16 all seasons. That's the run where I missed second twice and wheel hopped through first badly.

                    I don't understand the physics behind that. haha
                    85 325e m60b44 6 speed / 89 535i
                    e30 restoration and V8 swap
                    24 Hours of Lemons e30 build

                    Comment

                    • rneedham1979
                      E30 Modder
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 852

                      #295
                      Sir,

                      You are absolutley correct! Many believe the term R-compound helps standing start traction, this is often not the case with a roadrace tire like the RA1, Nitto RII, NT01 etc... I have tried them all(E39 M5) and the stiff sidewall hinders hard starts.... The difference between these three tires and BFG 275/35/18's was ridiculous. I will be running an r -compound on my E30 but will have an extra set of wheels with DR's mounted... to get a good launch you need DR's or Slicks, in addition to a soft rear set up. The car has to be able to squat, meaning, the sway bar must be on the softest setting if adjustable, proper camber must be dialed in and of course, your suspension must be able to squat. Set your shocks on the softest setting etc.... not rocket science but it can make a huge difference.

                      Originally posted by Wh33lhop
                      Yeah, well the reall stiff sidewall of r-comp and street-autox type tires (leading to less longitudinal contact patch) doesn't really do much for straight line traction, but the soft compound and small void area do help a bit.

                      Interestingly enough, most of what I've seen points to beater cars with crappy tires and stock, small (but light) wheels getting the best quarter mile times. Crappy tires tend to have crappy sidewalls leading to more of a contact patch, but also to less rotational inertia (no sidewall reinforcement), and most people who get aftermarket wheels, even if they are as light as stock are pushing the mass further from the axis of rotation creating more of a moment of inertia regardless.

                      I think, for the most part, unless you're on drag radials or slicks, tire choice doesn't matter that much for quarter mile times.
                      Turbo E30
                      Roadkill 80lb 93 octane OBDI tune
                      BavSol Cylinder Head
                      Stock S50 in. cam Schrick ex. cam
                      Otis' tubular T4 manifold
                      Oringed 87mm S52, Eagle rods and 8.5:1 CP pistons.
                      GT4094r w/Batmowheel Impeller
                      614whp@17.5psi, 100 Oct
                      690whp@21psi, 100 Oct
                      801whp@27psi, 110 URT
                      Old: 1/4 mile: 10.91@144.38 (636whp)
                      New: ?
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_f7fUVqblI

                      Comment

                      • justin_l_
                        E30 Enthusiast
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 1079

                        #296
                        Originally posted by Wh33lhop
                        Well, if everyone had a 2.8 stroker ix they could sidestep at 6 grand and take off like a bat out of hell it probably would :p



                        Damn, that's pretty quick. Justin's was sort of a freak of nature though.

                        You're running a stock M50TU on r-comps? No chip or anything?

                        Seems like a lot of DOHC guys have a straight-up cone filter (hot air intake), I'm not sure how much hotter IATs are with that but I doubt it helps much. Justin's heat shield and probably the fact that he's running a really tall first gear (equivalent to a G260 and a 2.93 or 3.25 he said, didn't he?) and didn't have too many traction problems is probably partially to blame, but a 13.9 is a lot quicker than I'd expect to be, even with some WR and a chip.
                        I take that as a compliment . I have since sold that to somebody in mass and am currently building slammed hardtop vert with a holset hx35 powered nv m50. Should go like a raped ape. Looking for 350ish to the wheels. Wonder what type of time this is gunna be puttin down...;)

                        Comment

                        • Wh33lhop
                          R3V OG
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 11705

                          #297
                          Originally posted by justin_l_
                          I take that as a compliment . I have since sold that to somebody in mass and am currently building slammed hardtop vert with a holset hx35 powered nv m50. Should go like a raped ape. Looking for 350ish to the wheels. Wonder what type of time this is gunna be puttin down...;)
                          Yeah, it was. Get some good tires and keep the stock rear suspension. :p
                          paint sucks

                          Comment

                          • nando
                            Moderator
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 34827

                            #298
                            Originally posted by justin_l_
                            I take that as a compliment . I have since sold that to somebody in mass and am currently building slammed hardtop vert with a holset hx35 powered nv m50. Should go like a raped ape. Looking for 350ish to the wheels. Wonder what type of time this is gunna be puttin down...;)
                            12s, no problem, unless you suck at drag racing (which is much harder than it looks!)
                            Build thread

                            Bimmerlabs

                            Comment

                            • justin_l_
                              E30 Enthusiast
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 1079

                              #299
                              Originally posted by nando
                              12s, no problem, unless you suck at drag racing (which is much harder than it looks!)
                              Originally posted by justin_l_
                              M50 nv, getrag 250, 2.93lsd junk tires for drifting. Stock engine w/146k, stock ecu, 2.5" exhaust.
                              R/T .480
                              60' 2.193
                              330 6.009
                              1/8 9.314
                              MPH 76.37
                              1/4 14.427 @ 96.64 MPH
                              Originally posted by justin_l_
                              New Time
                              R/T .139
                              60' 2.193
                              330 5.939
                              1/8 9.012 @79.8
                              1/4 13.920 @ 100.05 MPH
                              Added my chip and it helped me break 13's finally. Still need to replace my subframe bushings.
                              I'm not too bad at it...;)

                              Comment

                              • Stu
                                R3V Elite
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 4083

                                #300
                                Justin that's great for a 2.5. Do you shift with the gas pedal on the floor?

                                Comment

                                Working...