Originally posted by Wanganstyle
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by CMBusch View PostGotcha, makes sense. For some reason I think frankenmotors are super cool since the combinations never came from the factory.
Need is the best forced innovation; it s a great combo for someone looking for a replacement engine as the older m52/m50 engines are quite often tired. Much easier to come across a complete good running e46 for cheap nowadays or at least the m54
Frankie is headed to Sonoma Friday!OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25
Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30
Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wanganstyle View PostNeed is the best forced innovation; it s a great combo for someone looking for a replacement engine as the older m52/m50 engines are quite often tired. Much easier to come across a complete good running e46 for cheap nowadays or at least the m54
Frankie is headed to Sonoma Friday!
Let us know how it goes!Originally posted by MelonEngine work takes patience and finesse.
Suspension work takes anger, a big fucking hammer, and a torch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CMBusch View PostAgreed. My points exactly. Thankfully 2 out of my 3 M50's that I have are in decent shape. This also gives M54s a future purpose, rather than being turned into a wine bottle holder.
Let us know how it goes!
Frankie did 2:07 at thill east in testing..... Sonoma should be great.OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25
Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30
Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine
Comment
-
Originally posted by pazi88 View PostSo you are removing everything that makes m54 great engine and making it worse. Why? To make it fit that power/weight ratio, just de-tune using the stock m54 ms43 control unit, and the engine would have been drop in replacement. The -413 bosch is ancient technology compared to the ms43 you would had.
But now when you are doing that, remember to block those idle air holes in the head, or you are going to have massive vacuum leak.
Also being a racecar and getting some top-end out of the cams/intake combo, with likely a decent loss in midrange between all the VANOS variability/travel/lack of exhaust half of the system. I think it's a reasonable tradeoff for this specific application, but for me not worth the effort.
Maybe I missed what H did with the VANOS gap. I know the same sort of issue exists when adding dual VANOS to the iron block, and that basically needs the weld/machine flat treatment...Originally posted by priapismMy girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.Originally posted by shamesonUsually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30
Comment
-
So I was noticing that there is quite a bit of port mismatch from the D shaped m54 head, to the m52 oval shape.. I'm thinking im glad that I used the B30 engine, as the extra displacement will hopefully make up for the power loss the intake mismatch will cause. also to note, no one has mentioned the little tiny holes below the main intake ports that also lead to the intake valves. they are just the right size to tap with a 1/8 npt thread and plug with a plug. I'm betting that JB weld / right stuff gasket maker would also work too.
Comment
Comment