I don't see what the problem is. Just make it lower in the front.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
wishing i didnt just buy a late model...
Collapse
X
-
The early arches are better looking for sure, but the difference in what you can fit under there between the two is minimal.
Id cut it all out and go widebody if my car was even remotley fast enough to handle 10"ers. 8" wheels and 225's is plenty.-Jay
2014 NASA FL se30 champ #81
2001 se46 3 year plan in progress
Comment
-
I used to prefer early cars but the late models look great with plastic bumpers and rear apron (this is the main thing). As for the rear fender arch...no big deal just throw extra spring pads in the rear and/or lower the front."I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj
85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER
Comment
-
I fucken hate early tails, 'cept for M3's ofcourse.
Anyone actually seriously contemplating swapping to early arches is going to have bloody good reason for doing so, and will most likely have a shit-hot body man on call. The chance of the car not being on a rack while this is being done - zero.
SILBER COMBAT UNIT DELTA (M-Technic Marshal)
RTFM:http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=56950
Comment
-
You guys just wont go low enough to make them look good... Oh wait, you both drive early models, so you are biased! The output of early tails suck too. I am thinking about putting a late model tail section on my car for the tails... might look funny with the tech1 kit though... you all are haters.sigpic
Comment
Comment