Miller PSIK

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jules325i
    Grease Monkey
    • Jul 2011
    • 353

    #1

    Miller PSIK

    Is anyone on here running the miller PSIK with stock 325i or Stroker.
    Any Independent Dyno Results.
    I am really considering getting one.

    I have a 2.9 stroker with stock air box throttle body and ecu.
    Last edited by jules325i; 05-29-2012, 02:41 AM.


    329i
  • MR 325
    Moderator
    • Oct 2003
    • 37825

    #2
    Miller claims amazing numbers I personally do not believe.

    I'd spend them same amount of money on a plug and play Megasquirt from blueapplesoda or whodwho.
    BimmerHeads
    Classic BMW Specialists
    Santa Clarita, CA

    www.BimmerHeads.com

    Comment

    • jules325i
      Grease Monkey
      • Jul 2011
      • 353

      #3
      Originally posted by MR 325
      Miller claims amazing numbers I personally do not believe.

      I'd spend them same amount of money on a plug and play Megasquirt from blueapplesoda or whodwho.
      Yeah 25hp from a aluminium tube and a pod filter sounds a bit optimistic.

      Is installing megasquirt very involved.


      329i

      Comment

      • kamotors
        R3V OG
        • Nov 2007
        • 7102

        #4
        If you get a Whodwho megasquirt all you have to do it run a vacuum line to it, and use a GM temp sensor and your good to get the car running and start tuning. MS was worth every penny IMO


        7speedshop.com

        Comment

        • CptnVortex
          Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 46

          #5
          I'm running the PSIK on my 327i swap. I do not have any Dyno results, but I can say it made a definite improvement, especially in the mid range where torque tends to fall. Now there doesnt feel like there is that dead zone of torque and power between 2200 and 3500 rpm. It does sound pretty great also, and the chip has a higher redline, somewhere around 7krpm.

          Comment

          • Kershaw
            R3V OG
            • Feb 2010
            • 11822

            #6
            i installed an m30 afm into my car (put m20 internals in it) and my ix feels like it has more torque and when climbs into power, it does so a lot faster. thats all butt dyno. i also gained +3mpg. i went from seeing 19-20mpg to consistently seeing 23.5mpg. and yes, im using my old m20 internals so nothing there changed.

            so im a firm believer that the afm is a restriction on our cars. and i thought they claim 25whp with the psik AND the war chip. which is a bit of a stretch, but not wholly out of the range of reality. 5whp for the intake and 20whp for a legitimate tune.
            AWD > RWD

            Comment

            • jules325i
              Grease Monkey
              • Jul 2011
              • 353

              #7
              Originally posted by kamotors
              If you get a Whodwho megasquirt all you have to do it run a vacuum line to it, and use a GM temp sensor and your good to get the car running and start tuning. MS was worth every penny IMO
              So i would have to tune my car myself i have very little knowledge in that department.


              329i

              Comment

              • digger
                R3V Elite
                • Nov 2005
                • 5909

                #8
                Toftt
                89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

                new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

                Comment

                • jules325i
                  Grease Monkey
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 353

                  #9
                  Originally posted by digger
                  Toftt
                  ?


                  329i

                  Comment

                  • nando
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 34827

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Kershaw
                    i installed an m30 afm into my car (put m20 internals in it) and my ix feels like it has more torque and when climbs into power, it does so a lot faster. thats all butt dyno. i also gained +3mpg. i went from seeing 19-20mpg to consistently seeing 23.5mpg. and yes, im using my old m20 internals so nothing there changed.

                    so im a firm believer that the afm is a restriction on our cars. and i thought they claim 25whp with the psik AND the war chip. which is a bit of a stretch, but not wholly out of the range of reality. 5whp for the intake and 20whp for a legitimate tune.
                    it's mostly from the tune. you don't get 5whp from making the AFM larger or replacing it, and the TB is still only 60mm.
                    Build thread

                    Bimmerlabs

                    Comment

                    • Kershaw
                      R3V OG
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 11822

                      #11
                      i read a diy on the m30 afm conversion and the guy had dynos done before and after. he gained 3whp. same shop. i havent done dynos, but i feel a difference. so i think 5whp from an intake thats as long as the psik is plausible.

                      i'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they experimented with different lengths to see which give the best results due to hem-holtz resonance.

                      and you're right, the next thing to increase the size of would be the throttle body.
                      AWD > RWD

                      Comment

                      • nando
                        Moderator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 34827

                        #12
                        yeah, but the stock TB isn't a restriction on a stock motor, either. at least, not at an RPM that the stock engine can make power. I have real measurements to prove that. :)
                        Build thread

                        Bimmerlabs

                        Comment

                        • digger
                          R3V Elite
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 5909

                          #13
                          Originally posted by jules325i
                          ?
                          Take One For The Team

                          it is worth noting that there are more to intakes than whether or not they pose a restriction. The intake is essentially a tube with size and length and therefore volume which influences how the waves that are generated as the intake valve opens and closes will travel, these pressure waves can have positive and negative benefits if tuned correctly.
                          89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

                          new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

                          Comment

                          • ForcedFirebird
                            R3V OG
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 8300

                            #14
                            Originally posted by nando
                            it's mostly from the tune. you don't get 5whp from making the AFM larger or replacing it, and the TB is still only 60mm.
                            60mm will support a ton of flow. without going into math, I have memorized that a 65mm TB will flow 440cfm, only because we use them a lot on 60v6.

                            Originally posted by Kershaw
                            i read a diy on the m30 afm conversion and the guy had dynos done before and after. he gained 3whp. same shop. i havent done dynos, but i feel a difference. so i think 5whp from an intake thats as long as the psik is plausible.

                            i'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they experimented with different lengths to see which give the best results due to hem-holtz resonance.

                            and you're right, the next thing to increase the size of would be the throttle body.
                            Originally posted by nando
                            yeah, but the stock TB isn't a restriction on a stock motor, either. at least, not at an RPM that the stock engine can make power. I have real measurements to prove that. :)
                            It's easy to see if the throttle plate is a restriction. Measure vacuum just before/after the plate and anything more than 2" difference equals restriction.

                            Originally posted by digger
                            Take One For The Team

                            it is worth noting that there are more to intakes than whether or not they pose a restriction. The intake is essentially a tube with size and length and therefore volume which influences how the waves that are generated as the intake valve opens and closes will travel, these pressure waves can have positive and negative benefits if tuned correctly.
                            You said that to me once, and was confused lol. It sure is easy to theorize on a forum, rather than prove results.

                            Butt dyno results are just that.
                            john@m20guru.com
                            Links:
                            Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                            Comment

                            • digger
                              R3V Elite
                              • Nov 2005
                              • 5909

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
                              60mm will support a ton of flow. without going into math, I have memorized that a 65mm TB will flow 440cfm, only because we use them a lot on 60v6.

                              It's easy to see if the throttle plate is a restriction. Measure vacuum just before/after the plate and anything more than 2" difference equals restriction.

                              You said that to me once, and was confused lol. It sure is easy to theorize on a forum, rather than prove results.

                              Butt dyno results are just that.
                              If you look at the miller curves between the MAF kit and PSIK there are lowend/midrange gains that can't be attributed to the removal of the AFM or the tune (both don't have AFM and are tuned for the setup) and you don't really get lowend torque gains by "reducing restriction" so if the gains are real they must be from something else.....if i had a stock car i'd be all over the PSIK and would do back to back testing. I have been meaning to get just the pipe section without the MAF but any testing i do is likely to be unrepresenative for others beacue i have a modded airbox setup anyway.
                              89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

                              new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

                              Comment

                              Working...