Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ForcedFirebird's m20 dyno thread.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by darvo View PostNice Dyno #'s! I recently purchased a set of 12:1 85mm Vac 885 head pistons for a 89.6 and 135mm stroker build but the m54 block I had in mind was thrown away before I got to it.Originally posted by darvo View PostThe pistons are 12:1 for 89.6 and 135mm rods, but the m54 block disappeared after Hurricane María.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SLEEPYDUB View PostI have an 89.6mm S52 crank for sale if you're interested. Can ship to your island if you pay for it. Crank was recently polished within spec, balanced, and even comes with the snout spacer you'll need for the M20. Message me if you're interested in it
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View PostHe needs the 84mm and has the 89.6 (which is putting his pistons way out of the deck - hence the .100" gasket plan).
I only got a E block laying so, I was looking for 139mm rods to use with a 81mm to match the deck height but only found 138mm to use with the pistons.
The 0.100 gasket is to lower the compression to 11.2-11.5, I would like that CR with my current cam.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View PostHe needs the 84mm and has the 89.6 (which is putting his pistons way out of the deck - hence the .100" gasket plan).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SLEEPYDUB View PostI have an 89.6mm S52 crank for sale if you're interested. Can ship to your island if you pay for it. Crank was recently polished within spec, balanced, and even comes with the snout spacer you'll need for the M20. Message me if you're interested in it
He needs the 84mm and has the 89.6 (which is putting his pistons way out of the deck - hence the .100" gasket plan).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darvo View PostThanks Guys! I'll keep an eye on a 84mm, aint 89.6mm bad for rod/stroke ratio?
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Guys! I'll keep an eye on a 84mm, aint 89.6mm bad for rod/stroke ratio?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darvo View PostYup, the 84 would be perfect my main problem is availability where I live. Live on a little islandOriginally posted by digger View PostGet one sent to your little island. It will be worth it though getting the original crank you had planned is probably better as the bottom end and midrange torque will be a lot better
I agree with Digger. Should be able to get one shipped from the states to PR.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by digger View Postmy guess is the differences are mostly breathing modsOriginally posted by LowR3V'in View Postlooks like that cam isn't doing shit
Swapped the diff out, it was smoked. I couldn't even turn the output flanges by hand once it was on the ground. If it was that stuck static, I could only imagine how much it was dragging at top speeds. I wondered why the graph kinda went flat from 5-6000rpm, then dipped, were m20's usually have a smooth curve that peaks at 6k.
Again, not sure that car will go back to the dyno anytime soon, but will see what I can do.
Leave a comment:
-
Get one sent to your little island. It will be worth it though getting the original crank you had planned is probably better as the bottom end and midrange torque will be a lot better
Leave a comment:
-
Yup, the 84 would be perfect my main problem is availability where I live. Live on a little island
Leave a comment:
-
Why not use 84mm stroke as that works almost spot on or get another 89.6 crank they aren't expensive in the grand scheme of the overall build process
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View PostHonestly I have not done much with the adjustable gears on the dyno.
Here's the graphs from Sat.
81mm crank, 130mm rods, b25 pistons, .080" (2.03mm) off the deck, stock cam (and cam gear), in house rebuilt head, .035 quench, bored throttle body, extrude manifold, eBay headers, single 2.5" exhaust through 2 mufflers. MS1 with a smooth elbow pipe, cone filter.
[ATTACH]125591[/ATTACH]
81mm crank, 130mm rods, b25 pistons, .080" (2.03mm) off the deck, IE 272 cam (stock cam gear), in house rebuilt head, .050" quench, stock intake/TB, stock exhaust manifolds, single 2.5" exhaust with a single resonator. Stock ECU re-mapped at the dyno.
I believe this car "should" have made more power, was actually a little disappointed. Later after watching a video sent by a friend, I can hear a lot of diff noise that was impossible for me to hear in the car while tuning (one car bay with a dyno in it). Doubt we will bring it back to the dyno, just rebuild the diff and send it racing.
[ATTACH]125592[/ATTACH]
So I found a set of 138mm rods that I'll use with a 81mm eta crank to build my 2.7i. I'mm just have to deck the block 1mm and put a thicker 0.100" gasket to lower compression to 11.5:1.
I'll be using my stock 885 head and 284/272 schrick which made my stock b25 anemic down low.
Looking forward to end results.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: