ForcedFirebird's m20 dyno thread.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
I have a feeling the diff is causing parasitic loss. Going to pull it out tomorrow anc check it out.
New cam.
Two other differences are the first one has 3.73 final drive, second has 4.10 with oil pressure relief blocked (~80ish psi oil pressure max), and first had 10w40 conventional, second had 10w60 (~65 max oil pressure) - but don't believe the oil made the difference as they both were hot enough.Leave a comment:
-
It's amazing that both graphs are basically identical upto 5000rpm.
So the first has
- standalone ecu
- header
- exrtrude hone
- bbtb and fine style inlet
- tighter squish clearance
But the second has a IE 272, is it regrind or Schrick knock off ?Leave a comment:
-
Could the extruded intake have made that much difference and if I may ask what that costs ?Leave a comment:
-
Honestly I have not done much with the adjustable gears on the dyno.
Here's the graphs from Sat.
81mm crank, 130mm rods, b25 pistons, .080" (2.03mm) off the deck, stock cam (and cam gear), in house rebuilt head, .035 quench, bored throttle body, extrude manifold, eBay headers, single 2.5" exhaust through 2 mufflers. MS1 with a smooth elbow pipe, cone filter.
81mm crank, 130mm rods, b25 pistons, .080" (2.03mm) off the deck, IE 272 cam (stock cam gear), in house rebuilt head, .050" quench, stock intake/TB, stock exhaust manifolds, single 2.5" exhaust with a single resonator. Stock ECU re-mapped at the dyno.
I believe this car "should" have made more power, was actually a little disappointed. Later after watching a video sent by a friend, I can hear a lot of diff noise that was impossible for me to hear in the car while tuning (one car bay with a dyno in it). Doubt we will bring it back to the dyno, just rebuild the diff and send it racing.
Leave a comment:
-
have you seen any power from retarding the cam seeing as allot of people resurfaced/shaved heads but with no adjustable gear.Leave a comment:
-
Ahh thanks for the clarification. I must have missed that if you mentioned it before. Still good power output.Leave a comment:
-
These are NOT 2.7 short blocks with a 885 heads. They are 81mm cranks, 130mm rods, stock b25 pistons and machine the block deck to get compression height back. We took .080" off these blocks, but beware of squish. Both engines got shaved heads, one was too close at .035" piston to head clearance. To be safe without measuring, I would suggest taking .070-.075" if you want to use an off the shelf head gasket.Leave a comment:
-
Wow those numbers are fantastic for a 2.7 stroker. That's promising data for anyone thinking about going that route.Leave a comment:
-
Did two "budget stroker" 2.7's today on the dynojet. Will post results and anecdotes later, but 2.7 crank/rods with b25 pistons and milled deck is super viable, even with the reduction in cam timing.
2 examples today. One made at the wheels: 180hp/179tq and the other did 168hp/172tq
Stock used blocks/pistons, fresh rings/bearings, a bbtb, headers, and even aftermarket ECU was involved. LolLeave a comment:
-
-
Building another one now that will surely go to the dyno as it's getting installed in the race car and will need plots for HP/WT ratio for classing.
None lately. Have an s50 rebuild in the works, and it's racing season so we will be going to the rollers soon.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: