ForcedFirebird's m20 dyno thread.

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by moatilliatta

    Apples are not Apples, Get back to us on a dynoJet corrected in SAE.

    Your 5252 cross is not at 5252.
    agree on using a meaningful point of reference such as DJ, dyno dynamics or Maha which cant just fudge like many others.

    the 5252 cross doesnt occur because the y-axis scales for power and torque differ

    Leave a comment:


  • moatilliatta
    replied
    Originally posted by AliBOSS
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20251212_174115_Adobe Acrobat(1).jpg
Views:	124
Size:	114.3 KB
ID:	10152911


    ​​​​​
    Apples are not Apples, Get back to us on a dynoJet corrected in SAE.

    Your 5252 cross is not at 5252.

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBurgundy
    bro if i cant get 200whp out of a higher compression 2.7i w itbs imma push it off a cliff
    Just do it properly and should be ok

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBurgundy
    replied
    bro if i cant get 200whp out of a higher compression 2.7i w itbs imma push it off a cliff

    Leave a comment:


  • 2mAn
    replied
    Here are some stock 2.7i dyno results from my old setup. Overall, pretty solid and expected for a 'junkyard' motor/ combo. I wonder how much this could've gotten cleaned up with either a chip-tune, or an aftermarket EFI.



    Here is the dyno of the '2.8i' post installation after removing the 2.7i. Bottom end is an eta with the 81mm crankshaft and some 10:1 Ross Racing pistons that were sourced from (I believe) Ireland Engineering years ago. Unknown camshaft and no real headwork. Camshaft is mild because this is a street motor he built for a client a while ago. I am dreaming of ITBs for the future... but for now I will enjoy the nice bump



    Leave a comment:


  • 2mAn
    replied
    MrBurgundy I expect to see some new dyno plots from you here soon, 200WHP or BUST...

    Leave a comment:


  • AliBOSS
    replied
    It's not an 85.8mm stroke but a 3.0 crankshaft from an m54 that we balanced and lightened. So we are talking about 89.6mm

    The diesel block we used the block only and adapted it to accept the 885 head. We didn't use bigger pistons, because the diesel block wouldn't support more than 84mm of boring from previous experience.

    The block is actually longer that's why we used it, also a lot of modifications and grinding has been done to be able to rotate the crank without the rods hitting the cylinder wall.

    Also we are using one of the worst pump gas quality wich is the only available.

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by 88Sedan
    Those are some of the highest m20 numbers I have seen. I want to know every detail of this motor! I've never heard of an m20 diesel block before or anyone using 140mm rods in an m20.
    MM were using 140.5mm rods 20 years ago. The diesel block is an m21 and it is where the forged 81mm crank comes from that Alpina used in their engines, and where the the high flow oil pumps that are sometimes mentioned come from.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2mAn
    replied
    Originally posted by AliBOSS

    I'm not sure, we are using stock parts from other engines, nothing is forged. The static compression is around 180 but our giant retarded camshaft is lowering the numbers
    Trying to break this down a little more with my failed ME math

    84mm Bore X 85.8mm stroke = 2853cc or a solid 2.9L

    Compression Ratio is still a mystery because US S50 had 135mm rods, EU S50 had 142mm…

    What fuel does the motor like?

    Leave a comment:


  • 88Sedan
    replied
    Those are some of the highest m20 numbers I have seen. I want to know every detail of this motor! I've never heard of an m20 diesel block before or anyone using 140mm rods in an m20.

    Leave a comment:


  • AliBOSS
    replied
    Originally posted by 2mAn
    Those are some impressive numbers!! What’s the compression ratio on your setup
    I'm not sure, we are using stock parts from other engines, nothing is forged. The static compression is around 180 but our giant retarded camshaft is lowering the numbers

    Leave a comment:


  • 2mAn
    replied
    Those are some impressive numbers!! What’s the compression ratio on your setup

    Leave a comment:


  • AliBOSS
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20251212_174115_Adobe Acrobat(1).jpg
Views:	124
Size:	114.3 KB
ID:	10152911 Good Morning everyone,
    I would to share with you our Frankenstein M20 that we finally dynoed 1 week ago

    It's diesel block, 885 hand ported head,Dbilas open M5 3.6 itbs with their trumpets, 3.0 crank knife edge and balanced and 84mm pistons on 140mm rods, electric water pump and fan, mechanical pump deleted. Standalone ecu tuned by me.

    ​​​​​​
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • zaq123
    replied
    I meant thrust crank clearance.. I'm sure you got it but just in case.... Thrust bearing is the reason you should not use an impact wrench on that crank bolt btw. Hand tools only

    Leave a comment:


  • McGyver
    replied
    I appreciate both of your perspectives on this! The cylinders have all been bored for 0.50mm over pistons, main and rods have all been cut and bored to match the crank. Plastigauge will confirm there weren't machining mistakes. It would be cool to get the actual measurements, but I don't think that justifies buying tools with enough precision to provide a real measurement.

    I plan to file the ring end gaps per cylinder for a Turbo application. I'll also measure/swap piston/rods to get even piston height at TDC for all six cylinders. And I'll balance the piston assemblies as best I can. I'll also check valve clearance to the new guides with the new cam and check piston to valve clearance with the new-but-crushed head gasket. Should be good!

    Leave a comment:

Working...