MMP M62B44 Build Project "Jack-N-Coke"
Collapse
X
-
I don't think an x-pipe or anything after the manifolds will make much of a performance difference. Most of us already have nearly straight-through designs, different mufflers will tune the sound. I have a magnaflow, as seems to be the most common, a flow master will probably give you a deeper sound. If you want to go in a different direction use the M60 or early M62 manifolds. It's way more work, that's why everyone uses the late M62 or X5 manifolds. -
Only the late M62 and X5 are this configuration. On the early M62 the manifolds are two pieces on each side, meeting in a y-pipe on each side.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
-
RD headers>true merge y>2.5" Vibrant resonator>true merge y>Billy Boat e30 triple chamber made 157whp on a 200k mile m20 with a chip (no baseline on that one though :() That's .020" over well built Spec e30 engine territory, most high mileage m20's make 140-148 (even chipped).
Done derailing this thread, sorry, carry on Jeremy...
[/HIJACK]Leave a comment:
-
We aren't quite discussing the m20, but will tell you, shorties, do nothing over stock "logs" as you call them (more like tubular headers). I have dyno tested various headers on m20's, and the stock cast units are actually decent. Only until you get over 24" or so, will you see gains, and that's only in torque (best of 5wtq, 0whp to date).
BMW OEM exhaust was very well designed for being what it was, specially when we are talking about decades old, at that.
Have you found gains in other areas of the exhaust on a stockish M20? Are the down pipes big enough? 2 into 1 exhaust superior? Or is the whole stock exhaust hard to beat?Leave a comment:
-
BMW OEM exhaust was very well designed for being what it was, specially when we are talking about decades old, at that.Leave a comment:
-
Lol.... no no please I have enjoyed this read. Very interesting and educational.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Leave a comment: