If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I thought the guy was an unbiased 3rd party and couldn't understand who would choose a 2.3_16 over an M3 (especially a sport evo) but it should be pointed out that Jason Cammisa is a long time 190 owner and member of 190revolution. Not exactly impartial. No wonder he chose the 190. His decision is based purely on his opinion without any reasoning behind it. He's basically saying, the 190 isn't as good as the M3, BUT it's the cooler car! lol. Quoted: "Jason Camissa from Automobile Magazine has one and the magazine did a nifty little article on his black 2.3 and the E30 M3 Sam Smith bought. You can read the article in the February 2007 issue."
Points made about suspension seem completely irrelevant. Most enthusiasts would put GC's or KW in there anyway.
Nope. When comparing and reviewing two old cars, it makes sense to compare them in their most stock form and explain the reasons why they were made that way.
Like I said in the last thread, the M3 is a track car that can be driven on the road, the 190cos is a road car that can be taken to the track.
Comment