Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stroker build.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    looks fun


    '89 325i - Totaled... good bye my love...
    '87 327i budget stroker - SOLD!!!
    '92 240sx - ca18det powered drift toy - SOLD!!!
    '89 325i - coupe - NEW daily
    '96 Audi A6 Quattro- Grocery getter/baby hauler
    '99 Busa - weekend wheelie monster

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by SpecM View Post
      Danny... no machine work is need on the pistons? Just drop-in?
      Well they are stock afterall ;) But there may need to be little reliefs cut in the skirts along with the bobbing of the crank.

      Anyone know anything about VAC high performance valve springs?

      Comment


        #33
        Sooo... Maybe I missed another thread from you where you explained this already, but how exactly is this 2.8 coming together? The "spacer" you mentioned must be referring to a spacer between the head and the block? Is that correct?


        Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

        Comment


          #34
          No it fits over the crank and fills the hole in between the oil seal and where the M20 crank's "snout" I guess, used to be.

          Comment


            #35
            Okay, so then I'm confused. I could have sworn I calculated that with the m52 stroke, the eta rods, and the I pistons, the piston deck height was either 1.5 or 3mm too tall. Am I crazy, or have you found a way around this?


            Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

            Comment


              #36
              Its the same deck height as stock I pistons, you must have calculated wrong somewhere.

              Comment


                #37
                Damn. That's frustrating.


                Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

                Comment


                  #38
                  Okay I figured it out. I was off, but I was partly right. The m52 2.8 crank has a stroke of 84mm, compared to the m20b25 stroke of 75mm, meaning the crank-center-to-tdc difference is 4.5 mm. The eta rods, however, are 5mm shorter than the I rods (130mm compared to 135), leaving you .5mm short. Which, obviously, is not the same as .5mm too tall. I must have mixed this up with one of my other prospective combos. But so is that .5mm small enough that you're just not worried about it?


                  Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

                  Comment


                    #39
                    .5mm shorter than stock deck height?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Yyeah...


                      Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

                      Comment


                        #41
                        The increased stroke puts the comp ratio back up to where it belongs, yes the stroke:rod ratio isn't ideal, but it works.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Okay cool. That's what i was wondering. Thanks man.


                          Body roll+perspective=the poor man's drop

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Slangbox View Post
                            Okay cool. That's what i was wondering. Thanks man.
                            :up:

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Cool project, Very interested in your results. Gonna pick up one of those spacers when he make more.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Crank spacer arrived today.

                                On the crank:



                                How it fits over the crank and between the oil seal.





                                And the spacer itself.


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X