looks fun
Stroker build.
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Sooo... Maybe I missed another thread from you where you explained this already, but how exactly is this 2.8 coming together? The "spacer" you mentioned must be referring to a spacer between the head and the block? Is that correct?
Body roll+perspective=the poor man's dropComment
-
Okay, so then I'm confused. I could have sworn I calculated that with the m52 stroke, the eta rods, and the I pistons, the piston deck height was either 1.5 or 3mm too tall. Am I crazy, or have you found a way around this?
Body roll+perspective=the poor man's dropComment
-
Okay I figured it out. I was off, but I was partly right. The m52 2.8 crank has a stroke of 84mm, compared to the m20b25 stroke of 75mm, meaning the crank-center-to-tdc difference is 4.5 mm. The eta rods, however, are 5mm shorter than the I rods (130mm compared to 135), leaving you .5mm short. Which, obviously, is not the same as .5mm too tall. I must have mixed this up with one of my other prospective combos. But so is that .5mm small enough that you're just not worried about it?
Body roll+perspective=the poor man's dropComment







Comment