911 Funnies

[Aptyp]

^ agreed. Now, conspiracy theorists ask a whole lot of questions and instead of deducing an answer that makes sense, they simply throw shit out there for others to disprove. As if it's other people's job to make a few loonies feel better.


As far building 7... And this is a theory, and not a conspiracy one... That building had been used by CIA and FBI and many other little known/unknown government organizations. I think someone lost his nerve and pushed a self-destruct button. Again, I have no proof of this, and not saying that it happened, but I don't have much of an explanation for that building. It wasn't that tall, it was very well reinforced, and timing was very incredible. Towers under their own weight would collapse straight down, but building like 7 could not implode. It makes very little sense.

My only idea is, that towers' debris sand blasted the hell out of that building and broke some structural skin/glass, which caused building to lose balance. Either way, this was one thing that I always debated.

[E88 Owner...But E30 Fan]

You "engineers" are all the same,you think whats written on paper is always correct than real life.

Actually what I learned through physical experiments makes me think that is what happens in real life. I know how metal behaves and certain structures/materials, act in certain ways when certian loads and stresses are put on them.

But enough of that. Lets stop fighting about this shit and remember the people who died...in a not sacastic and demeaning way.

[s0urce]

For the truthers that feel alone:

Here's a page full of VERIFIED & LICENSED Engineers in the United States that believe the Story given to us behind 911 does not line up with the carnage.

http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=ARCH

[e30-RTN]

yes. Think of it in terms of energy, and not simply jet fuel. There was a lot of energy released, much if it in the form of heat. Also, concrete will absorb a lot of heat, and it will stay hot for a very long time.

I highly doubt that concrete/steel will retain heat for more than 120 hrs. Especially outside. Yet fires continued to burn far down in the rubble piles for over 100 days after the attack, despite the spraying of water on the rubble for extended periods.

1. Inside the Pentagon.
2. Same reason they don't let us view a lot of video. Maybe it showed something classified but unrelated. The fact that they aren't releasing a video is not enough for me to go against thousands of witnesses who saw an airplane hit the Pentagon.
3. because the wings would have sheared off, leaving a more or less circular hole in the side of such a reinforced concrete structure. You don't understand physics very well, do you?

1. Inside??! Where was the debris when it was still on the lawn, smart ass? Did that plane magically vaporize too?
2. Doubtful. Witness accounts state they saw "something" hit the pentagon. Not one person recognized it as a conventional plane. The trajectory of the plane that hit the pentagon would have needed to be held perfectly to fly a plane 6' off the ground into the side of a building. With out leaving a mark on the lawn.
Did you see a rut where the plane tore up the lawn?
3.Wings? What wings....they didn't find wings!!!
I understand the basics of physics just fine thank you.

we have a phrase for what you're doing. It's called "grasping at straws". Grow up and learn to recognize when the facts overwhelmingly support an answer.

I have yet to grasp at anything buddy. I simply asked some questions. thats how us "conspiracy" minded people work...We open our eyes and ask questions.

and if we hadn't gone after them it would have been an affront to Liberty and those innocent civilians who died that day. The aftermath was mishandled, and possibly misused for political gain, sure. Argue that.

I don't need to, you already know it.

But to argue that the initial outrage was politically motivated is to utterly insult everyone who was affected that day, as well as everyone with enough national pride to be offended by an attack on our country.

you are correct sir, that is why i left my opinions out of the memorial thread. And since opinions fly around like a dragonfly on crack here on R3v...Letting my opinion out here isn't going to offend anyone who already isn't. ;)

[chadthestampede]

[e30-RTN]

^^this

[Massive Lee]

... we were attacked by ruthless killers who hate the fact that women can get an education, and we have advanced our civilization past the point which stoned people for small offenses, forcefully married off 11 yr olds, cut off people's genitals, and pull people who oppose them apart with horses. And we had every right to be angry with them, and if we hadn't gone after them it would have been an affront to Liberty and those innocent civilians who died that day. The aftermath was mishandled, and possibly misused for political gain, sure. Argue that. But to argue that the initial outrage was politically motivated is to utterly insult everyone who was affected that day, as well as everyone with enough national pride to be offended by an attack on our country.

Are you serious about all of the above or are you just drunk? I think you are mixing a lot of things that are absolutely unrelated. Genital excision has nothing to do with 9-11. It isn't even practiced by muslims. It is purely a tribal African "ritual". Iraq has absolutely nothing to do with 9-11. It was invaded because they had the oil that American wanted. Weapons of mass destruction? Yeah sure. Afghanistan has nothing to do with 9-11 either. It is a strategical location for gaz pipelines. The "evil terrorist" who orchestrated the whole thing belongs to a very "friendly" ethny that supplies America with oil. Isn't Ben Ladin a Saudii?

[chadthestampede]

Lee is it possible for you to make a post without using a smiley

[Ral]

Lee.. everything you talked about is what I was referring to as "the aftermath". I was referring to the feeling of nationalism immediately following the attacks that was being derided.

[Massive Lee]

Lee.. everything you talked about is what I was referring to as "the aftermath". I was referring to the feeling of nationalism immediately following the attacks that was being derided.

Lee is it possible for you to make a post without using a smiley

I use a smiley when the content of my post could be perceived as agressive, and prefer to be read as an amused tone. Obviously words-only rarely reflect the tone of a voice and the intention.

In regard of Ral's comments, it was either extremely and genuinely uneducated, or full of sarcasm (which I didn't feel), reflecting the ignorance of a whole outraged population. Indeed, what excision has to do with 9-11 and is lapidation worst than electrocution? After all, it is in the Bible too.

[Wh33lhop]

You "engineers" are all the same,you think whats written on paper is always correct than real life.

Please, someone tell me he's joking so I know he's not a complete and utter fucktard.

[Fidhle007]

I can out fiddle you any day.

Oh THAT I'd like to see...

Seriously, shut the fuck up already. All of you.

[nkell09]

Let's put the buildings back together with some painters tape.

[ak-]

this is 911 Funnies.
talk about this shit somewhere else

[E88 Owner...But E30 Fan]

There was nothing funny about 9-11...except for that South Park episode.