I do a little bit of trail riding from time to time. I know nothing about mountain bikes, I just get on and ride. I currently have a 2000 Trek 820. It has front suspension (a whopping 2.5" of travel, my research tells me). I bought it new in 2000 and have used it occasionally since, but much more recently as I'm really starting to enjoy it more and more.
The other day, my buddy rented a $4200 GT carbon full suspension bike. Hydraulic disc brakes, light enough to lift with a finger, and it was amazing to ride. It has me wanting a bike with disc brakes, good travel front and rear suspension, etc...
So I started looking at the GT Force 3.0. It seems like a great value at $1000-$1200. 5" of travel front and rear, discs, decent components from what I can tell. Apparently the rear suspension design allows good climbing ability without a lot of 'bobbing' that makes pedaling up hills so hard.
Someone school me on bikes, please? Is this a decent deal for a good beginner all-around bike? I'm still a panzy on a bike, I don't do 30mph downhill over 3 foot drops and shit (especially on my current bike). And after a few hills I'm usually stopping for a breather. So I don't need a $4000 bike, as I am obviously the weak link.
Would it be a better investment to start with the 2.0 or 1.0? Or go with another brand?
Thanks
The other day, my buddy rented a $4200 GT carbon full suspension bike. Hydraulic disc brakes, light enough to lift with a finger, and it was amazing to ride. It has me wanting a bike with disc brakes, good travel front and rear suspension, etc...
So I started looking at the GT Force 3.0. It seems like a great value at $1000-$1200. 5" of travel front and rear, discs, decent components from what I can tell. Apparently the rear suspension design allows good climbing ability without a lot of 'bobbing' that makes pedaling up hills so hard.
Someone school me on bikes, please? Is this a decent deal for a good beginner all-around bike? I'm still a panzy on a bike, I don't do 30mph downhill over 3 foot drops and shit (especially on my current bike). And after a few hills I'm usually stopping for a breather. So I don't need a $4000 bike, as I am obviously the weak link.
Would it be a better investment to start with the 2.0 or 1.0? Or go with another brand?
Thanks
Comment