Computer thread!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lambo
    replied
    Originally posted by Wschnitz
    Its that bad? I think I get 50-150mb/s Down but the ping is atrocious.
    Yeah it's terrible. Ping is shit, too. I don't understand why it is so bad. On campus is perfectly fine, but at my place it blows.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Originally posted by lambo
    I hate you guys. I am currently stuck with university provided <8Mb/s shoddy Internet.
    Its that bad? I think I get 50-150mb/s Down but the ping is atrocious.

    Leave a comment:


  • lambo
    replied
    I hate you guys. I am currently stuck with university provided <8Mb/s shoddy Internet.

    Leave a comment:


  • EN318isPDX
    replied
    Originally posted by Wschnitz
    Yeah Cat6 is pretty much the standard now. No ISP will provide anything over 10gb/s in the near future, nor does anyone have the capability sans google.
    Cat5 is still the king of home ethernet. The cost of a cat6 switch is insane. I have a few Dell N4064's that do Cat6 10gb but they cost over 8000$ each


    If you are looking to play around with a Layer3 switch than I recommend you use a spare PC/HD and install PFsense on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    sorry, yeah I didn't mean cat10. I honestly haven't paid much attention to this stuff in a long time, except being annoyed that the $100 switch I had 15 years ago performed better than the wireless router I have now.
    Yeah Cat6 is pretty much the standard now. No ISP will provide anything over 10gb/s in the near future, nor does anyone have the capability sans google.

    Leave a comment:


  • EN318isPDX
    replied
    SFP+ is the common 10gb connection in a datacenter
    QSFP+ is what I work with at work and thats just 4 SFP+ = 40gb.. 100gb is 10 SFP+ ect ect



    QSFP+ on the right & 4 SFP+ on the left.. Cost effective its not worth it in a household. Just go with gigabyte and cat5 throughout. 10gb has issues over long cables so you would have to run fiber in your walls and the price just went way up

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    sorry, yeah I didn't mean cat10. I honestly haven't paid much attention to this stuff in a long time, except being annoyed that the $100 switch I had 15 years ago performed better than the wireless router I have now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    what am I looking at here? home built router with open source firmware?

    I hate wireless routers. I always have. Even the best ones are flakey and they're never as fast as they advertise. I got one of the best rated/value ones last year and it's definitely an improvement but the reception downstairs is poor and I still have to restart it fairly often. When we redo the siding of our house, I was planning on running some cat-10 through the walls and ditch the stupid wireless.
    Cat10, dude you running enterprise servers in your house? or planning on staying there for 20 years? Actually where are you going to get it, only found like one site with it.

    At the rate that ISPs adopt tech we wont see anything requiring it for years, and from what ive read it doesnt work in lengths over 12M or so.

    Cat6 does 10gb/s fine.

    On the router side I agree, i think half of the problem is requirements of ISPs. The best thing I did before is put DDWRT on a Netgear and never had a problem. Where the included or stock software router would always go down.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    what am I looking at here? home built router with open source firmware?

    I hate wireless routers. I always have. Even the best ones are flakey and they're never as fast as they advertise. I got one of the best rated/value ones last year and it's definitely an improvement but the reception downstairs is poor and I still have to restart it fairly often. When we redo the siding of our house, I was planning on running some cat-10 through the walls and ditch the stupid wireless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    So im confused, you installed DDWRT? Or you hated it and switched? Because DDWRT is actually pretty decent compared to the shit software that comes on routers stock.

    If the government has their way you want be able to change the software in the future anyway....

    Leave a comment:


  • R3Z3N
    replied
    Well, I am done with shitty ethernet/wifi in the house, so I just wired up my house for 3 Ubiquitiy UAP Pros in the ceilings, and one Outdoor+ on the garage. Setup a PFSense box for routing/firewall/proxy and threat management.

    It is SO nice to be done with DD-WRT, have stable networking with the advanced features.

    I followed this build for my router and it is pretty epic:
    A place to discuss Netgate products and projects such as pfSense, TNSR, and hardware



    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Some day.

    PC setup actually fit in dorm room desk.

    Leave a comment:


  • lambo
    replied
    Hence why I will be forever disappointed

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Originally posted by lambo
    I really just want a monitor that is IPS, 1920x1080, 60-144hz, 1-5ms, 26-27". That would be my perfect monitor.
    IPS + high refresh rate and response time never happens though. Sucks

    Edit: lambo I have that monitor from newegg you linked, best monitor ever.

    Leave a comment:


  • kickinindian
    replied
    the only time i would ever use a higher resolution monitor is when using photoshop and other stuff involving photo and video editing, unless i am getting paid lots of monies to do so ill get by just fine on a 1080p monitor. even thin i would probably have it on a work rig and keep my gaming rig on dual 1080 resolution

    Leave a comment:

Working...